Exploring pharmacists' perceptions of using a clinical supervision skills competency tool to reflect and develop their supervisory practices.

INTRODUCTION: To date, there are no formal self-reflection tools routinely used by pharmacists within the Australian pharmacy profession. The study involved utilizing the Clinical Supervision Skills Competency Tool (CSSCT) at a metropolitan teaching hospital in Victoria, Australia. It explored pharmacists' perceptions of the CSSCT and its impact on their ability to self-reflect and develop their supervisory practices. METHODS: The qualitative study involved adapting the Clinical Supervision Skills Review Tool (CSRT), a clinician-validated tool. Prior to tool completion, participants attended an orientation session on the CSSCT. Thematic analysis and an inductive approach was then applied to data collected from two semi-structured focus group sessions and an online survey, for those not able to attend the focus groups. RESULTS: A total of 19 pharmacists were recruited and completed the CSSCT. The three major themes regarding the CSSCT identified were: feasibility of the tool, aspects of the CSSCT, and future planning. Use of rating scales and breakdown of the supervisory competencies were perceived to be helpful. Conversely, the tool's length, pharmacists' high workloads and time pressures, were identified as potential barriers to using the tool. CONCLUSIONS: Given pharmacists internationally currently lack a formal tool to enhance their supervisory methods, the CSSCT or similar tools emerge as valuable resources for steering pharmacists towards self-reflection and goal setting. Notably, the CSSCT sheds light on previously overlooked yet critical aspects of clinical supervision in the pharmacy context, including the wellbeing and cultural sensitivity of learners.

The psychophysiology of Mastermind: Characterizing response times and blinking in a high-stakes television game show.

Television game shows have proven to be a valuable resource for studying human behavior under conditions of high stress and high stakes. However, previous work has focused mostly on choices-ignoring much of the rich visual information that is available on screen. Here, we take a first step to extracting more of this information by investigating the response times and blinking of contestants in the BBC show Mastermind. In Mastermind, contestants answer rapid-fire quiz questions while a camera slowly zooms in on their faces. By labeling contestants' behavior and blinks from 25 episodes, we asked how accuracy, response times, and blinking varied over the course of the game. For accuracy and response times, we tested whether contestants responded more accurately and more slowly after an error-exhibiting the "post-error increase in accuracy" and "post-error slowing" which has been repeatedly observed in the lab. For blinking, we tested whether blink rates varied according to the cognitive demands of the game-decreasing during periods of cognitive load, such as when pondering a response, and increasing at event boundaries in the task, such as the start of a question. In contrast to the lab, evidence for post-error changes in accuracy and response time was weak, with only marginal effects observed. In line with the lab, blinking varied over the course of the game much as we predicted. Overall, our findings demonstrate the potential of extracting dynamic signals from game shows to study the psychophysiology of behavior in the real world.