Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
JAMA Dermatol ; 156(2): 186-190, 2020 02 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31825455

ABSTRACT

Importance: Oral propranolol is widely considered to be first-line therapy for complicated infantile hemangioma, but its use in patients with PHACE (posterior fossa malformations, hemangioma, arterial anomalies, cardiac defects, eye anomalies) syndrome has been debated owing to concerns that the cardiovascular effects of the drug may increase the risk for arterial ischemic stroke. Objective: To assess the incidence of adverse events among patients with PHACE syndrome receiving oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter retrospective cohort study assessed the incidence of adverse events among 76 patients with PHACE syndrome receiving oral propranolol for infantile hemangioma at 11 tertiary care, academic pediatric dermatology practices. Medical records from January 1, 2010, through April 25, 2017, were reviewed. Exposures: Patients received oral propranolol, 0.3 mg/kg/dose or more. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was the rate and severity of adverse events occurring throughout the course of treatment with oral propranolol, as documented in the medical records. Adverse events were graded from 1 to 5 using a scale derived from the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and were considered to be serious if they were grade 3 or higher. Results: A total of 76 patients (59 girls and 17 boys; median age at propranolol initiation, 56 days [range, 0-396 days]) met the inclusion criteria. There were no reports of serious adverse events (ie, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or cardiovascular events) during treatment with oral propranolol. A total of 46 nonserious adverse events were reported among 29 patients (38.2%); the most commonly reported nonserious adverse events were sleep disturbances and minor gastrointestinal tract and respiratory tract symptoms. In a comparison with 726 infants who received oral propranolol for hemangioma but did not meet criteria for PHACE syndrome, there was no significant difference in the rate of serious adverse events experienced during treatment (0 of 76 patients with PHACE syndrome and 3 of 726 patients without PHACE syndrome [0.4%]). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that oral propranolol was used to treat infantile hemangioma in 76 patients with PHACE syndrome and that no serious adverse events were experienced. These data provide support for the safety of oral propranolol in this patient population.


Subject(s)
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/administration & dosage , Aortic Coarctation/physiopathology , Eye Abnormalities/physiopathology , Hemangioma/drug therapy , Neurocutaneous Syndromes/physiopathology , Propranolol/administration & dosage , Administration, Oral , Adrenergic beta-Antagonists/adverse effects , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Propranolol/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
2.
Paediatr Drugs ; 21(4): 239-260, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31364023

ABSTRACT

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, inflammatory erythematous skin lesions, and skin-barrier defect. Current mainstay treatments of emollients, steroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and immunosuppressants have limited efficacy and potentially serious side effects. Recent advances and understanding of the pathogenesis of AD have resulted in new therapies that target specific pathways with increased efficacy and the potential for less systemic side effects. New FDA-approved therapies for AD are crisaborole and dupilumab. The JAK-STAT inhibitors (baricitinib, upadacitinib, PF-04965842, ASN002, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, and delgocitinib) have the most promising results of the emerging therapies. Other drugs with potential include the aryl hydrocarbon receptor modulating agent tapinarof, the IL-4/IL-13 antagonists lebrikizumab and tralokinumab, and the IL-31Rα antagonist nemolizumab. In this review, new and emerging AD therapies will be discussed along with their mechanisms of action and their potential based on clinical study data.


Subject(s)
Dermatitis, Atopic/drug therapy , Child , Dermatitis, Atopic/pathology , Humans
3.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol ; 56(1): 41-59, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30145645

ABSTRACT

Consumer products and topical medications today contain many allergens that can cause a reaction on the skin known as allergic contact dermatitis. This review looks at various allergens in these products and reports current allergic contact dermatitis incidence and trends in North America, Europe, and Asia. First, medication contact allergy to corticosteroids will be discussed along with its five structural classes (A, B, C, D1, D2) and their steroid test compounds (tixocortol-21-pivalate, triamcinolone acetonide, budesonide, clobetasol-17-propionate, hydrocortisone-17-butyrate). Cross-reactivities between the steroid classes will also be examined. Next, estrogen and testosterone transdermal therapeutic systems, local anesthetic (benzocaine, lidocaine, pramoxine, dyclonine) antihistamines (piperazine, ethanolamine, propylamine, phenothiazine, piperidine, and pyrrolidine), topical antibiotics (neomycin, spectinomycin, bacitracin, mupirocin), and sunscreen are evaluated for their potential to cause contact dermatitis and cross-reactivities. Finally, we examine the ingredients in the excipients of these products, such as the formaldehyde releasers (quaternium-15, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3 diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, DMDM hydantoin), the non-formaldehyde releasers (isothiazolinones, parabens, methyldibromo glutaronitrile, iodopropynyl butylcarbamate, and thimerosal), fragrance mixes, and Myroxylon pereirae (Balsam of Peru) for contact allergy incidence and prevalence. Furthermore, strategies, recommendations, and two online tools (SkinSAFE and the Contact Allergen Management Program) on how to avoid these allergens in commercial skin care products will be discussed at the end.


Subject(s)
Allergens/adverse effects , Cosmetics/adverse effects , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/diagnosis , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/etiology , Allergens/chemistry , Allergens/immunology , Animals , Cosmetics/chemistry , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/prevention & control , Dermatitis, Allergic Contact/therapy , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/immunology , Drug Hypersensitivity/therapy , Humans
4.
JAMA Dermatol ; 154(6): 661-669, 2018 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29562060

ABSTRACT

Importance: Patients with vascular malformations (VAMs) and vascular overgrowth syndromes have lower health-related quality of life (HRQoL) attributable to social stigmatization, poor mental health, severity, and pain. However, the factors that contribute to this decreased HRQoL are not clear. Objective: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies that used validated HRQoL instruments to compare the HRQoL of persons with VAMs with the US general population. Data Sources: A comprehensive search was performed in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus from 1946 to March 31, 2017, with the consultation of an experienced librarian. Study Selection: All VAM studies with validated HRQoL instruments published in the English language were included. Case reports, review articles, non-English-language publications, and studies about the development of new HRQoL instruments were not included. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers assessed studies' eligibility and the risk of bias and performed data extraction. The meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model. Comparisons of means were performed using the unpaired, 2-sample t test. Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcome was HRQoL. Results: Eleven studies met the inclusion criteria for a total of 692 patients with VAMs. Six studies (320 patients) were included in the meta-analysis, whereas 5 studies were included in the qualitative analysis (372 patients). Those with VAMs had lower 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey scores in bodily pain (mean difference, -11.87; 95% CI, -21.45 to -2.29; I2 = 92%; P = .02) and mental health (mean difference, -6.04; 95% CI, -11.55 to -0.52; I2 = 83%; P = .03) compared with the US general population. Conclusions and Relevance: Patients with VAMs had increased pain and psychosocial distress compared with the US general population. Pain and psychological morbidity are associated with poorer HRQoL and may serve as indicators for quality of life.


Subject(s)
Pain/etiology , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Vascular Malformations/complications , Vascular Malformations/psychology , Humans , Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome/complications , Klippel-Trenaunay-Weber Syndrome/psychology , Mental Health
5.
Curr Opin Pediatr ; 29(4): 455-465, 2017 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28562419

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acne vulgaris is a global disease with increasing prevalence in adolescents. It has a profound impact on their quality of life, especially when endocrine disorders are also involved. Recent concerns regarding antibiotic stewardship, failures with antibiotic usage, and the development of antibiotic-resistant Propionibacterium acnes have led clinicians to consider other therapeutic options for acne treatment. The present review explores hormonal therapies for the treatment of acne vulgaris. RECENT FINDINGS: There are now four different combined oral contraceptive pills that are FDA approved for the treatment of acne since its first introduction in 1960. Recent literature has provided more information on the efficacy of different generations of combined oral contraceptive pills, their side-effects, and cancer risks. Furthermore, spironolactone has been gaining wider use among dermatologists in adolescents with endocrine dysfunction. New diagnostic guidelines and treatment recommendations have also been suggested. SUMMARY: Hormonal therapies are effective and well tolerated options for the treatment of acne vulgaris in adolescents with and without endocrine disorders. They can be used as monotherapy or in conjunction with benzoyl peroxide, topical retinoic acid, or antibiotics.


Subject(s)
Acne Vulgaris/drug therapy , Endocrine System Diseases/complications , Hormones/therapeutic use , Acne Vulgaris/etiology , Adolescent , Androgen Receptor Antagonists/therapeutic use , Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal/therapeutic use , Dermatologic Agents/therapeutic use , Drug Therapy, Combination , Endocrine System Diseases/diagnosis , Endocrine System Diseases/drug therapy , Estrogens/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/agonists , Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone/therapeutic use , Humans , Progestins/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...