Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cureus ; 15(6): e40144, 2023 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37425512

ABSTRACT

Anastomoses of the coronary buttons are the Achilles' heel of the modified Bentall procedure (MBP) for the repair of the aortic root and ascending aorta. We present a rare case of post-MBP right coronary artery button pseudoaneurysm in a 30-year-old man. The contained leak, attributed to a pseudoknot in the polypropylene suture, was visualized via computed tomography angiography and transesophageal echocardiogram and repaired under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest.

2.
Ann Plast Surg ; 88(3 Suppl 3): S197-S200, 2022 05 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35513319

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Sternal wound infections are a rare but life-threatening complication of cardiothoracic surgery. Prior literature has supported the use of negative pressure wound therapy to decrease sternal wound infections and promote healing. This study sought to determine whether closed incision negative pressure therapy reduced wound infection and improved outcomes in cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed including all adult patients who underwent nontraumatic cardiothoracic surgery at a single institution between 2016 and 2018 (n = 1199). Patient characteristics, clinical variables, and surgical outcomes were compared between those who did and did not receive incisional negative pressure wound therapy intraoperatively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis determined factors predictive or protective of the development of complications. RESULTS: Incisional negative pressure wound therapy was used in 58.9% of patients. Patients who received this therapy were older with statistically higher rates of hyperlipidemia, statin, and antihypertensive use. The use of negative pressure wound therapy was found to significantly reduce rates of both wound infection (3.0% vs 6.3%, P = 0.01) and readmission for wound infection (0.7% vs 2.6%, P = 0.01). After controlling for confounding variables, negative pressure wound therapy was found to be a protective factor of surgical wound infection (odds ratio, 0.497; 95% confidence interval, 0.262-0.945). CONCLUSIONS: In the largest population studied to date, this study supported the expanded use of negative pressure therapy on sternal wound incisions to decrease infection rates.


Subject(s)
Negative-Pressure Wound Therapy , Surgical Wound , Adult , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Wound/therapy , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Wound Healing
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...