ABSTRACT
Aims: To determine genetic susceptibility markers for carbamazepine (CBZ) and allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs) in Vietnamese. Methods: A case-control study was performed involving 122 patients with CBZ or allopurinol-induced SCARs and 120 drug tolerant controls. Results:HLA-B*58:01 was strongly associated with allopurinol-induced SCARs and strongly correlated with SNP rs9263726. HLA-B*15:02 was associated with CBZ-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis but not with drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. No association was found between HLA-A*31:01 and CBZ-induced SCARs. HLA-B*58:01 and rs3909184 allele A with renal insufficiency were shown to increase the risk of allopurinol-induced SCARs. Conclusion:HLA-B*58:01 and HLA-B*15:02 confer susceptibility to allopurinol-induced SCARs and CBZ-induced SJS/TEN in Vietnamese. SNP rs9263726 can be used as a surrogate marker in identifying HLA-B*58:01.
Subject(s)
Allopurinol/adverse effects , Asian People/genetics , Carbamazepine/adverse effects , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/genetics , HLA-B Antigens/genetics , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/genetics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Case-Control Studies , Female , Forecasting , Genetic Predisposition to Disease/epidemiology , Gout Suppressants/adverse effects , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/diagnosis , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/epidemiology , Vietnam/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Aim: To examine gene expression in different clinical phenotypes of allopurinol-induced severe cutaneous adverse reactions (SCARs). Materials & methods: Gene expression profiling was performed using microarray on 11 RNA samples (four controls, three hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, four Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis) followed by quantitative real-time PCR in a total of 11 SCARs patients and 11 controls. Results: The biological pathways which were significantly enriched in differentially expressed genes in Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis compared with hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms patients included; cell surface interactions at the vascular wall, immunoregulatory interactions at the immunological synapse and MyD88 signaling pathways. Overexpression of miR146a occurred in allopurinol-tolerant HLA-B*58:01 carriers. Conclusion: Biological pathways are identified which appear to be implicated in determining clinical phenotypes in allopurinol-induced SCARs. Overexpression of miR146a is potentially important for allopurinol tolerance in HLA-B*58:01 carriers.
Subject(s)
Allopurinol/adverse effects , Asian People/genetics , Drug Eruptions/genetics , Gene Expression/genetics , Skin/drug effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Exanthema/chemically induced , Exanthema/genetics , Female , Gene Expression Profiling/methods , Gout Suppressants/adverse effects , HLA-B Antigens/genetics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Signal Transduction/genetics , Stevens-Johnson Syndrome/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) is an acute, major, life-threatening complication of diabetes that requires immediate treatment. Allergic reaction to insulin is rare, especially when using recombinant human insulin. The clinical presentation of insulin allergy can range from minor local symptoms to a severe generalized allergic reaction such as anaphylaxis. A limited number of cases have been reported on the treatment of severe DKA in patients with type 2 diabetes with insulin allergy. Here, we describe a patient with type 2 diabetes with insulin allergy in which severe DKA resolved after the initiation of continuous intravenous (IV) recombinant human insulin infusion. CASE PRESENTATION: A 58-year-old man with type 2 diabetes initiated subcutaneous insulin administration (SIA) after failure of oral antidiabetic treatment. Symptoms of an allergic reaction developed, including pruritic wheals appearing within 10 min of injection and lasting over 24 h. Both skin prick and intradermal tests were positive with different types of insulin. Two days before admission, he stopped SIA because of allergic symptoms and then experienced weakness and upper abdominal pain. On admission, he was in severe metabolic acidosis with a pH of 6.984 and bicarbonate of 2.5 mmol/litre. The blood glucose level was 20.79 mmol/litre, BUN 4.01 mmol/litre, creatinine 128 µmol/litre, and urinary ketone 11.44 mmol/litre. Over 24 h, metabolic acidosis was refractory to IV fluids, bicarbonate and potassium replacement, as well as haemodialysis. Ultimately, he received continuous IV recombinant human insulin infusion at a rate of 0.1 units/kg/hour, in combination with haemodiafiltration, and no further allergic reactions were observed. On day 5, ketonaemia and metabolic acidosis completely resolved. He had transitioned from IV insulin infusion to SIA on day 14. He was discharged on day 21 with SIA treatment. Three months later, he had good glycaemic control but still had allergic symptoms at the insulin injection sites. CONCLUSIONS: In this patient, SIA caused an allergic reaction, in contrast to continuous IV insulin infusion for which allergic symptoms did not appear. Continuous IV recombinant human insulin infusion in combination with haemodiafiltration could be an option for the treatment of severe DKA in patients with diabetes with insulin allergy.
