ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the diagnostic performance of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), alpha-fetoprotein L3 isoform (AFP-L3), protein induced by vitamin K absence II (PIVKA-II), and combined biomarkers for non-B non-C hepatocellular carcinoma (NBNC-HCC). RESULTS: A total of 681 newly-diagnosed primary liver disease subjects (385 non-HCC, 296 HCC) who tested negativity for the hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and hepatitis C antibody (anti-HCV) enrolled in this study. At the cut-off point of 3.8 ng/mL, AFP helps to discriminate HCC from non-HCC with an area under the curve (AUC) value of 0.817 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.785-0.849). These values of AFP-L3 (cut-off 0.9%) and PIVKA-II (cut-off 57.7 mAU/mL) were 0.758 (95%CI: 0.725-0.791) and 0.866 (95%CI: 0.836-0.896), respectively. The Bayesian Model Averaging (BMA) statistic identified the optimal model, including patients' age, aspartate aminotransferase, AFP, and PIVKA-II combination, which helps to classify HCC with better performance (AUC = 0.896, 95%CI: 0.872-0.920, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of the optimal model reached 81.1% (95%CI: 76.1-85.4) and 83.2% (95%CI: 78.9-86.9), respectively. Further analyses indicated that AFP and PIVKA-II markers and combined models have good-to-excellent performance detecting curative resected HCC, separating HCC from chronic hepatitis, dysplastic, and hyperplasia nodules.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular , Liver Neoplasms , Humans , alpha-Fetoproteins/analysis , alpha-Fetoproteins/metabolism , Liver Neoplasms/pathology , Vitamin K , Vitamins , Bayes Theorem , ROC Curve , Biomarkers , Biomarkers, TumorABSTRACT
Background: MicroRNA-1246 (miR-1246), an oncomiR that regulates the expression of multiple cancer-related genes, has been attracted and studied as a promising indicator of various tumors. However, diverse conclusions on diagnostic accuracy have been shown due to the small sample size and limited studies included. This meta-analysis is aimed at systematically assessing the performance of extracellular circulating miR-1246 in screening common cancers. Methods: We searched the PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases for relevant studies until November 28, 2022. Then, the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were drawn and calculated area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, and specificity values of circulating miR-1246 in the cancer surveillance. Results: After selection and quality assessment, 29 eligible studies with 5914 samples (3232 cases and 2682 controls) enrolled in the final analysis. The pooled AUC, DOR, sensitivity, and specificity of circulating miR-1246 in screening cancers were 0.885 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.827-0.892), 27.7 (95% CI: 17.1-45.0), 84.2% (95% CI: 79.4-88.1), and 85.3% (95% CI: 80.5-89.2), respectively. Among cancer types, superior performance was noted for breast cancer (AUC = 0.950, DOR = 98.5) compared to colorectal cancer (AUC = 0.905, DOR = 47.6), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (AUC = 0.757, DOR = 8.0), hepatocellular carcinoma (AUC = 0.872, DOR = 18.6), pancreatic cancer (AUC = 0.767, DOR = 12.3), and others (AUC = 0.887, DOR = 27.5, P = 0.007). No significant publication bias in DOR was observed in the meta-analysis (funnel plot asymmetry test with P = 0.652; skewness value = 0.672, P = 0.071). Conclusion: Extracellular circulating miR-1246 may serve as a reliable biomarker with good sensitivity and specificity in screening cancers, especially breast cancer.
