Minimal clinically important differences on the DyNaChron questionnaire after surgery.

OBJECTIVES: To determine minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) for the DyNaChron chronic rhinosinusitis quality-of-life questionnaire. INTRODUCTION: MCIDs are the smallest changes in a quality-of-life score that are of clinical relevance for the patient. They allow treatment benefit to be estimated. MCIDs have not previously been determined for DyNaChron. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective study analyzed DyNaChron questionnaires filled out between June 2016 and December 2021 by all patients consulting for chronic nasal dysfunction. Five hundred and thirteen of the 2390 patients were operated on for nasal polyposis (NP; n=282) or septo(rhino)plasty+inferior turbinoplasty (SPIT; n=231). Standard error of measurement was used to determine MCIDs. RESULTS: MCID for DyNaChron global score was 60 in NP and 58 in SPIT. MCIDs per symptom domain in NP and SPIT respectively were: 15 and 13 for nasal obstruction, 21 and 21 for anterior rhinorrhea, 20 and 19 for posterior rhinorrhea, and 17 and 17 for olfaction. In agreement with global MCID, 257 NPs (91%) and 149 SPITs (65%) showed clinical improvement. CONCLUSION: MCID helps assess response to treatment. In the DyNaChron questionnaire, MCIDs enable global and symptom-specific assessment of chronic nasal dysfunction and its impact on quality of life in a single patient or in groups.

Recommendations for nutritional care after bariatric surgery: Recommendations for best practice and SOFFCO-MM/AFERO/SFNCM/expert consensus.

Nutritional care after bariatric surgery is an issue of major importance, especially insofar as risk of deficiency has been extensively described in the literature. Subsequent to the deliberations carried out by a multidisciplinary working group, we are proposing a series of recommendations elaborated using the Delphi-HAS (official French health authority) method, which facilitates the drawing up of best practice and consensus recommendations based on the data of the literature and on expert opinion. The recommendations in this paper pertain to dietary management and physical activity, multivitamin and trace element supplementation and the prevention and treatment of specific deficiencies in vitamins B1, B9, B12, D and calcium, iron, zinc, vitamins A, E and K, dumping syndrome and reactive hypoglycemia.

Effectiveness of omalizumab in severe allergic asthma and nasal polyposis: a real-life study

BACKGROUND: Omalizumab is a human anti-IgE antibody approved for the treatment of severe allergic asthma (SAA). However, its effectiveness in SAA associated with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSNP+) is less well documented. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the real-life effectiveness of omalizumab in patients with SAA and CRSNP+ who tolerated and did not tolerate aspirin. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, observational, multicenter, real-life study of patients with SAA and CRSNP+ treated with omalizumab for 6 months. Asthma outcome parameters (symptoms, number of salbutamol rescues/wk, number of moderate/severe exacerbations, Asthma Control Test score, and lung function), sinonasal outcome parameters (symptoms, number of episodes of acute rhinosinusitis, sinus computed tomography images, nasal polyps endoscopy score), and serum eosinophil levels were analyzed 6 months before and after treatment with omalizumab. RESULTS: Twenty-four adult patients were included (9 with documented aspirin intolerance). All respiratory parameters were significantly improved by the treatment. In parallel, a significant improvement was observed in sinonasal clinical outcomes and sinus computed tomography images, with no major effect on the nasal polyps endoscopy score. The serum eosinophil count decreased significantly after 6 months of treatment with omalizumab. CONCLUSION: Treatment of SAA with omalizumab improves the outcome of associated CRSNP+, thus supporting the concept of a "one airway disease"

ANTECEDENTES: El omalizumab es un anticuerpo anti-IgE humanizado aprobado para el tratamiento del asma alérgica grave (SAA), si bien su eficacia, cuando ésta se asocia a la rinosinusitis crónica con poliposis nasal (CRSNP+), está menos documentada. OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar en "vida real" la eficacia de omalizumab en pacientes con SAA y CRSNP+ con o sin intolerancia a la Aspirina. MÉTODOS: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo, observacional y multicéntrico, en vida real que incluyó pacientes con SAA y CRSNP+ que fueron tratados con omalizumab durante 6 meses. Las variables de eficacia en relación al asma (síntomas, número de inhalaciones de rescate de salbutamol por semana, número de exacerbaciones moderadas/graves, puntuación de la prueba de control del asma (ACT) y función pulmonar), y de la rinosinusitis (síntomas, número de rinosinusitis aguda, puntuación en tomografía computarizada, puntuación del tamaño de los pólipos en la endoscopia nasal) y el nivel de eosinófilos en sangre se analizaron antes y después de 6 meses de tratamiento con omalizumab. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron veinticuatro pacientes adultos (nueve con una intolerancia a la Aspirina documentada). Todas las variables de eficacia en relación al asma mejoraron significativamente con el tratamiento. Paralelamente, las variables clínicas de eficacia en rinosinusitis y la puntuación de las imágenes tomográficas de los senos paranasales mejoraron significativamente, si bien no se observó un efecto relevante en la puntuación de los pólipos en la endoscopia nasal. El nivel de eosinófilos en sangre disminuyó significativamente después de 6 meses de tratamiento con omalizumab. CONCLUSIÓN: El tratamiento con omalizumab en pacientes con SAA induce paralelamente una mejoría clínica y radiológica de la CRSNP+ asociada, lo que apoya el concepto de una única enfermedad de las vías respiratorias

Epidemiological data on anaphylaxis in French emergency departments

BACKGROUND: Although anaphylaxis has been considered a priority public health issue in the world allergy community, epidemiological data on morbidity and mortality remain suboptimal. We performed the first multicenter epidemiological study in French emergency departments (EDs). The study covered 7 EDs over a period of 1 year. The objectives were to identify areas that are amenable to change and to support ongoing national and international efforts for better diagnosis, management, and prevention of anaphylaxis. METHODS: Ours was a descriptive study based on data routinely reported to French institutional administrative databases from 7 French public health institutions in the Lorraine region between January and December 2015. Data were collected based on the anaphylaxis-related codes of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-10, and cases were clinically validated as anaphylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 202 079 admissions to the EDs, 4817 had anaphylaxis-related codes; of these, 323 were clinically validated as anaphylaxis. Although 45.8% were severe, adrenaline was prescribed in only 32.4% of cases. Of the 323 cases, 57.9% were subsequently referred for an allergy work-up or evaluation (after or during hospitalization), and 17.3% were prescribed autoinjectable epinephrine. CONCLUSION: Our results highlight an urgent need for improved public health initiatives with respect to recognition and treatment of anaphylaxis. We flag key problems that should be managed in the coming years through implementation of national and international actions

ANTECEDENTES: La anafilaxia es un problema prioritario de salud pública en la comunidad mundial alergológica. Sin embargo, los datos epidemiológicos disponibles de morbilidad y mortalidad son mejorables. Presentamos el primer estudio epidemiológico multicéntrico, realizado en siete departamentos de urgencias franceses durante un año, que tuvo como objetivo identificar las cuestiones relevantes para lograr cambios en futuras estrategias, nacionales e internacionales, que deriven en un mejor diagnóstico, tratamiento y prevención de la anafilaxia. MÉTODOS: Se trata de un estudio descriptivo que utilizó la información proveniente de las bases de datos de siete instituciones francesas de salud pública, de la región de Lorena, desde enero hasta diciembre de 2015. Se buscaron nomenclatura y códigos relacionados con la anafilaxia, de la Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades (CIE-10), y los pacientes fueron validados clínicamente como casos de anafilaxia. RESULTADOS: De los 202.079 ingresos en urgencias, 4.817 tenían códigos relacionados con la anafilaxia CIE-10, 323 de los cuales se validaron clínicamente con el diagnóstico de anafilaxia. Aunque el 45,8% presentó criterios de gravedad, la adrenalina se prescribió solo en el 32,4% de estos casos. En total, 323 casos, el 57,9%, se remitieron posteriormente para un estudio o evaluación alergológica (después o durante la hospitalización) y el 17,3% recibió una receta de adrenalina autoinyectable . CONCLUSIÓN: Según los resultados de este estudio, existe una necesidad urgente e imperiosa de mejorar los planes de salud pública respecto al reconocimiento y tratamiento de la anafilaxia. Los problemas clave detectados en este trabajo, señalan el camino de la toma de decisiones e implementación de acciones de mejora, nacionales e internacionales, para una mejor atención de los pacientes con anafilaxia

Sinonasal symptom assessment by the self-reported DyNaChron questionnaire: Before or after consultation?

OBJECTIVE: Assessment of sinonasal symptoms on a self-reported questionnaire is thoroughly subjective, but indispensable for quantifying symptoms. The present study sought to compare responses on the DyNaChron questionnaire just before and just after consultation for chronic sinonasal dysfunction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 78 patients (mean age, 43.1±16.9 years) consulting for chronic sinonasal dysfunction took part in a prospective study, responding to the computerized version of the DyNaChron self-reported questionnaire, in a dedicated room, just before and just after medical interview and physical examination. RESULTS: Most patients tended to grade symptoms as less severe after consultation. Significant differences in mean score were found for nasal obstruction (difference of 0.94/10), anterior (0.40) and posterior rhinorrhea (0.26), olfactory disorder (0.65), and facial pain and headache (0.65), but not for chronic cough. CONCLUSION: Self-reported scores for chronic sinonasal dysfunction differ slightly from before to after consultation. They are therefore to be interpreted with caution, taking account of possible factors of bias.

Assessment of facial pain and headache before and after nasal polyposis surgery with the DyNaChron questionnaire.

OBJECTIVES: Facial pain/headache is reported in 16-67% of nasal polyposis (NP) patients. This wide range may be due to differences in assessment methods. The present prospective study assessed facial pain/headache and quality-of-life (QoL) impact before and after NP surgery. METHODS: Pain was assessed on the DyNaChron self-administered questionnaire in patients undergoing NP surgery, the day before the procedure (V0) and 6 weeks (V1) and 7 months (V2) after. All patients underwent the same nasalization procedure, sparing the middle turbinates when possible. The questionnaire extract comprised 1 item assessing pain, 13 assessing physical impact and 4 assessing psychosocial impact, with responses on visual analog scales (VAS) graded 0 (no discomfort) to 10 (unbearable discomfort). RESULTS: Sixty-three patients (mean age: 50.6±12.8 years; 32 male [50.8%], 31 female [49.2%]) were included. Thirty-seven patients (58.7%) had history of NP surgery. Fifty-two percent reported moderate to severe pain before surgery, 17.5% at 6 weeks, and 22.2% at 7 months. One-third reported no pain preoperatively, versus a half at 6 weeks and 7 months. Scores for the physical and psychosocial impact of pain were improved after surgery. CONCLUSION: Headache/facial pain is frequent in patients for whom NP surgery is indicated. Endoscopic surgery relieves the symptom and its physical and psychosocial impacts. However, one-fifth of patients reported residual postoperative pain.