ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Randomised clinical trials are key to advancing medical knowledge and to enhancing patient care, but major barriers to their conduct exist. The present paper presents some of these barriers. METHODS: We performed systematic literature searches and internal European Clinical Research Infrastructure Network (ECRIN) communications during face-to-face meetings and telephone conferences from 2013 to 2017 within the context of the ECRIN Integrating Activity (ECRIN-IA) project. RESULTS: The following barriers to randomised clinical trials were identified: inadequate knowledge of clinical research and trial methodology; lack of funding; excessive monitoring; restrictive privacy law and lack of transparency; complex regulatory requirements; and inadequate infrastructures. There is a need for more pragmatic randomised clinical trials conducted with low risks of systematic and random errors, and multinational cooperation is essential. CONCLUSIONS: The present paper presents major barriers to randomised clinical trials. It also underlines the value of using a pan-European-distributed infrastructure to help investigators overcome barriers for multi-country trials in any disease area.
Subject(s)
Multicenter Studies as Topic/methods , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic/methods , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/methods , Research Design , Attitude of Health Personnel , Confidentiality , Cooperative Behavior , Equipment and Supplies , Europe , Evidence-Based Medicine , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Multicenter Studies as Topic/economics , Multicenter Studies as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Nutrition Therapy , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic/economics , Pragmatic Clinical Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/economics , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Rare Diseases/therapy , Research Design/legislation & jurisprudence , Research Personnel , Research Support as TopicABSTRACT
A cohort of genes associated with embryonic stem (ES) cell behaviour, including NANOG, are expressed in a number of human cancers. They form an ES-like signature we first described in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), a highly invasive and incurable brain tumour. We have also shown that HEDGEHOG-GLI (HH-GLI) signalling is required for GBM growth, stem cell expansion and the expression of this (ES)-like stemness signature. Here, we address the function of NANOG in human GBMs and its relationship with HH-GLI activity. We find that NANOG modulates gliomasphere clonogenicity, CD133(+) stem cell cell behavior and proliferation, and is regulated by HH-GLI signalling. However, GLI1 also requires NANOG activity forming a positive loop, which is negatively controlled by p53 and vice versa. NANOG is essential for GBM tumourigenicity in orthotopic xenografts and it is epistatic to HH-GLI activity. Our data establish NANOG as a novel HH-GLI mediator essential for GBMs. We propose that this function is conserved and that tumour growth and stem cell behaviour rely on the status of a functional GLI1-NANOG-p53 network.
