Use of collagen for standardization of PBSC graft quality evaluation: a multicenter comparative analysis of commercial collagen-based and methylcellulose-based colony-forming unit (CFU) assay kits.

The colony-forming unit-granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) assay, an essential test in evaluation of the quality of autologous grafts of hematopoietic stem cells, has yet to be standardized. With this aim in view, we carried out a multicenter study of five commercially available culture kits for CFU-GM evaluation. Four kits were methylcellulose-based (H4431, H4434, H4435, StemBio1d) and one was collagen-based (EasyClone-Multi). Using fresh and frozen samples of PBSC grafts, we compared CFU-GM and burst-forming unit-erythrocytes (BFU-E) growth using the EasyClone kit to each of the methylcellulose kits. BFU-E and CFU-GM clonogenicity of both fresh and frozen PBSC was clearly inferior with the H4431 kit, which provides conditioned medium only. CFU-GM numbers obtained with fresh and frozen PBSC samples were significantly higher with the EasyClone kit than with the H4434 and StemBio kits. BFU-E numbers were also higher with the EasyClone kit, but only when colonies were scored after May-Grünwald-Giemsa (MGG) staining. Finally, although the H4435 kit provides higher doses of recombinant cytokines than the EasyClone kit, CFU-GM and BFU-E numbers obtained for fresh or frozen PBSC with both kits were similar. In addition, CFU-GM and BFU-E numbers correlated well with CD34+ cell numbers for all five kits for both fresh and frozen PBSC. In summary, our study shows that the EasyClone-Multi and H4435 kits provide the best CFU-GM growth. The collagen-based EasyClone kit has the additional advantage of allowing gel staining and storage, which facilitates colony identification and, more importantly, makes gel exchange possible for standardization of the CFU-GM assay.

Analysis of platelet recovery after autologous transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukapheresis products.

We studied platelet recovery in relation to graft content in CFUs and CD34+ cells in 31 patients with multiple myeloma (21) or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (10) receiving marrow-ablative therapy followed by autologous transplantation with G-CSF mobilized CD34+ cells purified from leukapheresis products. Twelve patients had prolonged post-transplantation thrombopenia (> or = 14 days): their graft contents in CD34+ cells, CFU-GM and BFU-E were significantly inferior to those of patients with rapid platelet recovery. Although numbers of infused CD34+ cells and CFU-GM or BFU-E were well correlated, the graft content in CD34+ cells was the only parameter predictive of platelet recovery (r = -0.38, p = 0.04), with a threshold of 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. However, because rapid platelet reconstitution was obtained for 4 of 16 patients re-infused with < 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, we investigated whether the graft CFU-MK content might be a better predictor of platelet reconstitution than the CD34+ cell content. Eighteen CD34 grafts were studied for CFU-MK content: CD34 and CFU-MK contents were weakly correlated (r = 0.52, p = 0.03), but there was no correlation between numbers of infused CFU-MK and time to platelet recovery. We conclude that, for autologous CD34 grafts, CFU-MK assays, like CFU-GM or BFU-E assays, cannot be used to predict platelet recovery. A CD34+ cell content > or = 2.5 x 10(6)/kg remains the only reliable indicator of the platelet reconstitution capacity of a CD34 graft.