Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
Ital J Pediatr ; 43(1): 53, 2017 Jun 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28592270

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Visceral obesity in children increases the risk of developing cardiovascular diseases. To evaluate overweight children, in addition to Body Mass Index (BMI), waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) can be used to predict cardiometabolic risk. The goal of this study is to describe WHtR in a sample of Tuscan children. METHODS: A sample of children living in the province of Pistoia, Tuscany, was measured for the following anthropometric parameters: weight, height, and waist circumference. BMI and WHtR were calculated. For the latter indicator, a threshold of 0.5 was considered as a cardiovascular risk predictor. The subjects were classified into underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese using Cole's cut-offs. RESULTS: The number of children enrolled were 1575 (821 males; 754 females), aged 6-11 years. Of them, 64.3% were normal weight, 4.9% underweight, 22.3% overweight, and 8.5% obese. Moreover, 12.8% had a WHtR ≥0.5 (85.7% males; 88.7% females). The average WHtR value was 0.45 ± 0.045, and was significantly different as per gender (F = 0.45 vs. M = 0.46). WHtR was significantly correlated with BMI (r = 0.766). CONCLUSION: The average WHtR value was in line with previous studies conducted among children of similar age groups. Large-scale perspective studies are needed to validate the Italian WHtR cut-offs for children.


Subject(s)
Anthropometry/methods , Body Mass Index , Body Height , Body Weight , Child , Female , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Overweight/epidemiology , Pediatric Obesity/epidemiology , Prevalence , Waist Circumference
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 13(2): 359-368, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27929751

ABSTRACT

Asplenic or hyposplenic (AH) individuals are particularly vulnerable to invasive infections caused by encapsulated bacteria. Such infections have often a sudden onset and a fulminant course. Infectious diseases (IDs) incidence in AH subjects can be reduced by preventive measures such as vaccination. The aim of our work is to provide updated recommendations on prevention of infectious diseases in AH adult patients, and to supply a useful and practical tool to healthcare workers for the management of these subjects, in hospital setting and in outpatients consultation. A systematic literature review on evidence based measures for the prevention of IDs in adult AH patients was performed in 2015. Updated recommendations on available vaccines were consequently provided. Vaccinations against S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, H. influenzae type b and influenza virus are strongly recommended and should be administered at least 2 weeks before surgery in elective cases or at least 2 weeks after the surgical intervention in emergency cases. In subjects without evidence of immunity, 2 doses of live attenuated vaccines against measles-mumps-rubella and varicella should be administered 4-8 weeks apart from each other; a booster dose of tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis vaccine should be administered also to subjects fully vaccinated, and a 3-dose primary vaccination series is recommended in AH subjects with unknown or incomplete vaccination series (as in healthy people). Evidence based prevention data support the above recommendations to reduce the risk of infection in AH individuals.


Subject(s)
Disease Transmission, Infectious/prevention & control , Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes/complications , Splenic Diseases/complications , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Vaccines/immunology , Adult , Humans , Orthomyxoviridae
3.
Eur J Public Health ; 26(4): 561-9, 2016 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27095794

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Effective linkage to specialist care following screening is crucial for secondary prevention of chronic viral hepatitis-related consequences. METHODS: To explore the frequency of referral of patients to secondary care from the health services involved in screening and to gather information on the services responsible for the provision of post-test counselling and contact tracing, four online surveys were conducted among general practitioners (GP), and experts working in sexual health services (SHS), antenatal care (ANC) and specialist secondary care in Germany, Hungary, Italy, The Netherlands, Spain and the UK. RESULTS: Overall, 60% of GPs report referring all patients to specialist care. Although 67% of specialists commonly receive patients referred by GPs, specialists in Germany rarely or never receive patients from ANC or from centres testing injecting drug users; and specialists in the Netherlands, Hungary and Germany rarely receive patients from SHS. Gastroenterologists/hepatologists are the professionals mainly responsible for the provision of counselling following a positive diagnosis of viral hepatitis according to two-thirds of specialists, 14% of SHS providers and 11% of ANC providers. Almost half of ANC providers (45%) stated that gynaecologists are the professionals responsible for the provision of counselling to positive pregnant women; among SHS providers, only 14% identified SHS as the services responsible. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest the existence of complex/ineffective referral practices or that opportunities to screen risk groups are missed. Recommendations clarifying the services responsible at each step of the referral pathway are needed in order to increase the success of screening programmes.


Subject(s)
Hepatitis B, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis B, Chronic/epidemiology , Hepatitis C, Chronic/diagnosis , Hepatitis C, Chronic/epidemiology , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , European Union , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Hungary/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiology , Mass Screening/statistics & numerical data , Netherlands/epidemiology , Spain/epidemiology , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
Epidemiol Prev ; 39(4 Suppl 1): 119-23, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26499428

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of the varicella vaccination program in Toscana after one dose of vaccine, in the birth cohorts 2008-2011. DESIGN: Varicella vaccine effectiveness (VE) was calculated using the "screening method", based on vaccine coverage (VC) at 24 months and proportion of vaccinated subjects among varicella notified cases (PVC), verified through the Local Health Units' (LHUs) immunization registries. Breakthrough varicella (BV) was defined as a case of varicella occurring in a child vaccinated ≥42 days before the date of disease onset. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted in the 12 Tuscan LHUs and included all varicella cases notified in 2010-2013 in children of the birth cohorts 2008-2011. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: BV cases; VE after one dose of varicella vaccine; time interval between varicella vaccination and symptom onset. RESULTS: VC was 79.8%, VE reached 90.8%(95%CI 89.5%-92.0%) and the proportion of BV among notified cases was 26.6%. The median time interval between vaccination and symptom onset was 25 months. CONCLUSIONS: The very low rate of BV cases among vaccinated children confirms the high effectiveness even of a single dose of varicella vaccine and does not support a change of the current immunization schedule.


Subject(s)
Chickenpox Vaccine , Chickenpox/psychology , Immunization Programs , Chickenpox/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Immunization Schedule , Italy , Male , Program Evaluation , Time Factors , Vaccines, Attenuated
5.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 3(1): 137-47, 2015 Feb 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26344950

ABSTRACT

Immunization of health care workers (HCWs) against influenza has been associated with improvements in patient safety. The aim of this study is to assess the beliefs, attitudes, and knowledge of HCWs and health profession students regarding influenza. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed to HCWs in three local Florentine healthcare units, at Careggi University Teaching Hospital, and to students in health profession degree programs. A total of 2576 questionnaires were fully completed. A total of 12.3% of subjects responded that they were "always vaccinated" in all three of the seasonal vaccination campaigns studied (2007-2008 to 2009-2010), 13.1% had been vaccinated once or twice, and 74.6% had not received vaccinations. Although the enrolled subjects tended to respond that they were "never vaccinated," they considered influenza to be a serious illness and believed that the influenza vaccine is effective. The subjects who refused vaccination more frequently believed that the vaccine could cause influenza and that it could have serious side effects. More than 60% of the "always vaccinated" group completely agreed that HCWs should be vaccinated. Self-protection and protecting family members or other people close to the respondent from being infected and representing potential sources of influenza infection can be considered motivating factors for vaccination. The results highlight the importance of improving vaccination rates among all HCWs through multi-component interventions. Knowledge of influenza should be reinforced.

6.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 10(9): 2612-22, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25483489

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care workers (HCWs) are at risk of infection and transmission of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases. In recent years cases of measles or varicella in health care workers were observed with increasing frequency. The aim of our study was to investigate attitude toward immunization and risk perception of measles, rubella, mumps, varicella, and pertussis in HCWs working in 6 hospitals of Florence (Italy). METHODS: A cross-sectional survey among the physicians, nurses, midwives, and nursing assistants working in selected departments was performed trough a self-administered, anonymous questionnaire. Overall, 600 questionnaires were sent and 436 HCWs' completed forms were included into the study (Participation rate: 72.7%). Data were analyzed with STATA 11.0® and odds ratio (OR) were calculated in a multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Among all respondents 74.9% were females. The average age was nearly 43-years-old (42.9-SD 8.95). The majority of participants (58.6%) were nurses, 21.3% physicians, 12.9% nursing assistants, and 7.2% were midwives. Among those HCWs reporting no history of disease, 52.8% (95% CI: 42.0-63.3%) declared to have been immunized for measles, 46.9% for rubella (95% CI: 39.0-54.9%), 21.6% for mumps (95% CI: 15.1-29.4%), 14.9% for varicella (95% CI: 7.4-25.7%), and 14.5% for pertussis (95% CI: 10.0-20.0%). When considering potentially susceptible HCWs (without history of disease or vaccination and without serological confirmation), less than a half of them feel at risk for the concerned diseases and only less than 30% would undergo immunization. One of the main reasons of the relatively low coverage was indeed lack of active offer of vaccines. CONCLUSION: Attitudes toward immunization observed in this study are generally positive for preventing some infectious diseases (i.e., measles and rubella), but relatively poor for others (i.e., varicella). More information should be made available to HCWs on the benefits of vaccination and efforts to encourage vaccination uptake should be performed. Educational program on the risk of being infected working in a hospital should be implemented in order to increase the risk perception toward infectious diseases among HCWs.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Virus Diseases/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Hospitals , Humans , Italy , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...