Improving quality and reducing inequities: a challenge in achieving best care.

The health care quality chasm is better described as a gulf for certain segments of the population, such as racial and ethnic minority groups, given the gap between actual care received and ideal or best care quality. The landmark Institute of Medicine report Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century challenges all health care organizations to pursue six major aims of health care improvement: safety, timeliness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and patient-centeredness. "Equity" aims to ensure that quality care is available to all and that the quality of care provided does not differ by race, ethnicity, or other personal characteristics unrelated to a patient's reason for seeking care. Baylor Health Care System is in the unique position of being able to examine the current state of equity in a typical health care delivery system and to lead the way in health equity research. Its organizational vision, "culture of quality," and involved leadership bode well for achieving equitable best care. However, inequities in access, use, and outcomes of health care must be scrutinized; the moral, ethical, and economic issues they raise and the critical injustice they create must be remedied if this goal is to be achieved. Eliminating any observed inequities in health care must be synergistically integrated with quality improvement. Quality performance indicators currently collected and evaluated indicate that Baylor Health Care System often performs better than the national average. However, there are significant variations in care by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status that indicate the many remaining challenges in achieving "best care" for all.

Improving delivery of clinical preventive services: a multi-year journey.

BACKGROUND: Adults in the United States typically do not receive all recommended clinical preventive services (CPS) for which they are eligible, missing opportunities for prevention and/or early detection. A multi-year quality improvement initiative targeting CPS delivery in a fee-for-service ambulatory care network is described. METHODS: Since 1999, HealthTexas Provider Network (HTPN) has implemented multiple initiatives to increase CPS delivery, including a flowsheet, a physician champion model, physician- and practice-level audit and feedback, and rapid-cycle quality improvement training. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2006, "recommended or done" CPS delivery increased from 68% to 92%, and "done" from 70% to 86% (2001 to 2006). "Perfect care" composite performance increased from 0.19 to 0.51 (2001 to 2006). CONCLUSIONS: Long-term, multistrategy approaches can achieve substantial sustained improvement in CPS delivery throughout a large ambulatory care provider network.

Improving quality and reducing inequities: a challenge in achieving best care.

The health care quality chasm is better described as a gulf for certain segments of the population, such as racial and ethnic minority groups, given the gap between actual care received and ideal or best care quality. The landmark Institute of Medicine report Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century challenges all health care organizations to pursue six major aims of health care improvement: safety, timeliness, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and patient-centeredness. "Equity" aims to ensure that quality care is available to all and that the quality of care provided does not differ by race, ethnicity, or other personal characteristics unrelated to a patient's reason for seeking care. Baylor Health Care System is in the unique position of being able to examine the current state of equity in a typical health care delivery system and to lead the way in health equity research. Its organizational vision, "culture of quality," and involved leadership bode well for achieving equitable best care. However, inequities in access, use, and outcomes of health care must be scrutinized; the moral, ethical, and economic issues they raise and the critical injustice they create must be remedied if this goal is to be achieved. Eliminating any observed inequities in health care must be synergistically integrated with quality improvement. Quality performance indicators currently collected and evaluated indicate that Baylor Health Care System often performs better than the national average. However, there are significant variations in care by age, gender, race/ethnicity, and socioeconomic status that indicate the many remaining challenges in achieving "best care" for all.

Effectiveness of diabetes resource nurse case management and physician profiling in a fee-for-service setting: a cluster randomized trial.

Nurses with advanced training-diabetes resource nurses (DRNs)-can improve care for people with diabetes in capitated payment settings. Their effectiveness in fee-for-service settings has not been investigated. We conducted a 12-month practice-randomized trial involving 22 practices in a fee-for-service metropolitan network with 92 primary care physicians caring for 1891 Medicare patients ≥65 years with diabetes mellitus. Each practice was randomized to one of three intervention groups: physician feedback on process measures using Medicare claims data; Medicare claims feedback plus feedback on clinical measures from medical record (MR) abstraction; or both types of feedback plus a practice-based DRN. The primary endpoint investigated was hemoglobin A(1c) level. Other measures were low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol level, blood pressure, annual hemoglobin A(1c) testing, annual LDL screening, annual eye exam, annual foot exam, and annual renal assessment. Data were collected from medical chart abstraction and Medicare claims. The number of patients with hemoglobin A(1c) <9% increased by 4 (0.9%) in the Claims group; 9 (2.1%) in the Claims + MR group (comparison with Claims: P = 0.97); and 16 (3.8%) in the DRN group (comparison with Claims: P = 0.31). Results were similar for the other clinical outcomes, with no differences significant at P = 0.10. For process of care measures, decreases were seen in all groups, with no significant differences in change scores. Quality improvement strategies must be evaluated in the appropriate setting. Initiatives that have been effective in capitated systems may not be effective in fee-for-service environments.

Variation in diabetes care among states: do patient characteristics matter?

OBJECTIVE: To examine state variability in diabetes care for Medicare beneficiaries and the impact of certain beneficiary characteristics on those variations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes, aged 18-75 years, were identified from 1997 to 1999 claims data. Claims data were used to construct rates for three quality of care measures (HbA(1c) tests, eye examinations, and lipid profiles). Person-level variables (e.g., age, sex, race, and socioeconomic status) were used to adjust state rates using logistic regression. RESULTS: A third of 2 million beneficiaries with diabetes aged 18-75 years did not have annual HbA(1c) tests, biennial eye examinations, or biennial lipid profiles. There was wide variability in the measures among states (e.g., receipt of HbA(1c) tests ranged from 52 to 83%). Adjustment using person-level variables reduced the variance in HbA(1c) tests, eye examinations, and lipid profiles by 30, 23, and 27%, respectively, but considerable variability remained. The impact of the adjustment variables was also inconsistent across measures. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities remain for improvement in diabetes care. Large variations in care among states were reduced significantly by adjustment for characteristics of state residents. However, much variability remained unexplained. Variability of measures within states and variable impact of the adjustment variables argues against systems effects operating with uniformity on the three measures. These findings suggest that a single approach to quality improvement is unlikely to be effective. Further understanding variability will be important to improving quality.