Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci ; 62(14): 12, 2021 11 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34779820

ABSTRACT

Purpose: We sought to characterize neural motion processing deficits in children with cerebral visual impairment (CVI) who have good visual acuity using an objective, quantifiable method (steady-state visual evoked potentials [SSVEPs]). Methods: We recorded SSVEPs in response to three types of visual motion - absolute motion and more complex relative and rotary motion, comparing them to form-related vernier and contour responses. We studied a group of 31 children with CVI diagnosed via detailed clinical examinations and 28 age-matched healthy controls. Results: Using measurements made at the appropriate response harmonics of the stimulation frequency, we found significant deficits in cerebral processing of relative and rotary motion but not of absolute motion in children with CVI compared with healthy controls. Vernier acuity, in keeping with good recognition acuity in both groups, was not different, nor were contour-related form responses. Conclusions: Deficits for complex motion but relative sparing of elementary motion and form-related signals suggests preferential damage to extra-striate visual motion areas in children with CVI. The fact that these preferential losses occur in the absence of significant acuity loss indicates that they are not secondary to reduced visual acuity, but rather are an independent vulnerability in CVI. These results corroborate parental and caregivers' reports of difficulties with tasks that involve motion perception in children with CVI.


Subject(s)
Blindness, Cortical/physiopathology , Evoked Potentials, Visual/physiology , Motion Perception/physiology , Perceptual Disorders/physiopathology , Visual Acuity/physiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Electroencephalography , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male
2.
Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci ; 11(2): 317-26, 2016 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26350617

ABSTRACT

What determines how close you choose to stand to someone? Why do some people prefer farther distances than others? We hypothesized that an important factor is one's sensory sensitivity level, i.e. how sensitive one is to nearby visual stimulation, noise, touch or smell. This study characterizes the behavioral, hormonal and electrophysiological metrics of interpersonal distance (IPD) preferences in relation to levels of sensory sensitivity. Using both an ecologically realistic task and electroencephalogram (EEG), we found that sensory sensitivity levels predicted IPD preferences, such that the more sensitive one is the farther distance they prefer. Furthermore, electrophysiological evidence revealed that individuals with higher sensory sensitivity show more alpha suppression for approaching stimuli, strengthening the notion that early sensory cortical excitability is involved in one's social decision of how close to stand to another. The results provide evidence that a core human metric of social interaction is influenced by individual levels of sensory sensitivity.


Subject(s)
Alpha Rhythm/physiology , Brain/physiology , Personal Space , Electroencephalography , Female , Humans , Male , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...