A burden of proof study on alcohol consumption and ischemic heart disease.

Cohort and case-control data have suggested an association between low to moderate alcohol consumption and decreased risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), yet results from Mendelian randomization (MR) studies designed to reduce bias have shown either no or a harmful association. Here we conducted an updated systematic review and re-evaluated existing cohort, case-control, and MR data using the burden of proof meta-analytical framework. Cohort and case-control data show low to moderate alcohol consumption is associated with decreased IHD risk - specifically, intake is inversely related to IHD and myocardial infarction morbidity in both sexes and IHD mortality in males - while pooled MR data show no association, confirming that self-reported versus genetically predicted alcohol use data yield conflicting findings about the alcohol-IHD relationship. Our results highlight the need to advance MR methodologies and emulate randomized trials using large observational databases to obtain more definitive answers to this critical public health question.

Health effects associated with smoking: a Burden of Proof study.

As a leading behavioral risk factor for numerous health outcomes, smoking is a major ongoing public health challenge. Although evidence on the health effects of smoking has been widely reported, few attempts have evaluated the dose-response relationship between smoking and a diverse range of health outcomes systematically and comprehensively. In the present study, we re-estimated the dose-response relationships between current smoking and 36 health outcomes by conducting systematic reviews up to 31 May 2022, employing a meta-analytic method that incorporates between-study heterogeneity into estimates of uncertainty. Among the 36 selected outcomes, 8 had strong-to-very-strong evidence of an association with smoking, 21 had weak-to-moderate evidence of association and 7 had no evidence of association. By overcoming many of the limitations of traditional meta-analyses, our approach provides comprehensive, up-to-date and easy-to-use estimates of the evidence on the health effects of smoking. These estimates provide important information for tobacco control advocates, policy makers, researchers, physicians, smokers and the public.

Trephination versus wide excision for the treatment of pediatric pilonidal disease.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of trephination compared to wide excision in children undergoing initial surgical treatment of pilonidal disease. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of patients undergoing initial pilonidal excision between September 2017 and September 2018. Operations were categorized as either trephination or wide excision via an open or closed-wound technique. Outcomes were evaluated and data analyzed by chi-squared and one-way ANOVA tests. RESULTS: One-hundred and five patients were identified, with a mean follow-up of 4.6 months. Trephination was performed in 57% of patients, and of the remaining patients undergoing wide excision, 62% of wounds were left open. There were no demographic differences among the three groups. Compared to both the open and closed techniques, trephination was associated with fewer wound complications (17% vs 29% vs 3%, respectively, p = 0.006), and postoperative visits (4.4 vs 2.4 vs 1.4, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no difference in recurrence rates among groups. CONCLUSION: Trephination for pilonidal disease in pediatric patients is associated with a lower wound complication rate and fewer postoperative visits compared to wide excision. Recurrence rates are similar among the various surgical methods. Further prospective study would be useful to describe long-term outcomes of patients undergoing trephination for pilonidal disease. TYPE OF STUDY: Treatment study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III (retrospective comparative).

Premenarchal patients present differently: A twist on the typical patient presenting with ovarian torsion.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize differences between pre- and postmenarchal females with ovarian torsion. METHODS: A single-center review was conducted of all nonneonatal pediatric patients with ovarian torsion from 2011 to 2018. Clinical data were compared between pre- and postmenarchal patients. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients were identified, and 25% were premenarchal. Premenarchal patients were more likely to have a delay in diagnosis (38% vs 20%, p = 0.042), develop ovarian necrosis (34% vs 17%, p = 0.036), and present without an associated adnexal mass (44% vs 0%, p < 0.001). All patients without a mass (n = 14) were premenarchal and presented with ovarian asymmetry. Patients without an associated mass underwent oophoropexy in the majority of cases. There were no differences in postoperative complication or recurrence rates between groups. CONCLUSION: Premenarchal females with ovarian torsion can present differently than females postmenarche and often have a delay in diagnosis. Premenarchal females are more likely to undergo torsion without an associated adnexal mass and are at higher risk for ovarian necrosis. Oophoropexy is an appropriate treatment in the absence of an adnexal mass. A high-index of suspicion for ovarian torsion should be maintained for premenarchal females presenting with abdominal pain and an otherwise negative workup. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective comparative study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.