Resection and reconstruction in high-grade pancreatic head injuries.

This study by Chui et al adds further important evidence in the treatment of high-grade pancreatic injuries and endorses the concept of the model of pancreatic trauma care designed to optimize treatment, minimize morbidity and enhance survival in patients with complex pancreatic injuries. Although the authors have demonstrated favorable outcomes based on their limited experience of 5 patients who underwent a pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), including 2 patients who were "unstable" and did not have damage control surgery (DCS), we would caution against the general recommendations promoting index PD without DCS in "unstable" grade 5 pancreatic head injuries.

Is case triaging a useful tool for emergency surgeries? A review of 106 trauma surgery cases at a level 1 trauma center in South Africa.

Background: The optimal timing for emergency surgical interventions and implementation of protocols for trauma surgery is insufficient in the literature. The Groote Schuur emergency surgery triage (GSEST) system, based on Cape Triaging Score (CTS), is followed at Groote Schuur Hospital (GSH) for triaging emergency surgical cases including trauma cases. The study aimed to look at the effect of delay in surgery after scheduling based on the GSEST system has an impact on outcome in terms of postoperative complications and death. Methods: Prospective audit of patients presenting to GSH trauma center following penetrating or blunt chest, abdominal, neck and peripheral vascular trauma who underwent surgery over a 4-month period was performed. Post-operative complications were graded according to Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications. Results: One-hundred six patients underwent surgery during the study period. One-hundred two (96.2%) cases were related to penetrating trauma. Stab wounds comprised 71 (67%) and gunshot wounds (GSW) 31 (29.2%) cases. Of the 106 cases, 6, 47, 40, and 13 patients were booked as red, orange, yellow, and green, respectively. The median delay for green, yellow, and orange cases was within the expected time. The red patients took unexpectedly longer (median delay 48 min, IQR 35-60 min). Thirty-one (29.3%) patients developed postoperative complications. Among the booked red, orange, yellow, and green cases, postoperative complications developed in 3, 18, 9, and 1 cases, respectively. Only two (1.9%) postoperative deaths were documented during the study period. There was no statistically significant association between operative triage and post-operative complications (p = 0.074). Conclusion: Surgical case categorization has been shown to be useful in prioritizing emergency trauma surgical cases in a resource constraint high-volume trauma center.

Conservative management of gunshot oesophageal injuries: A report of two consecutive exceptional cases.

INTRODUCTION: Oesophageal trauma carries high mortality and morbidity. For penetrating intrathoracic oesophageal injury, surgical repair has been the standard for decades to avoid its devastating consequences. CASE REPORT: Both patients presented with a thoracoabdominal gunshot wound and retained intraabdominal missile. Although there were no visible signs of perforation on oesophagoscopy or contrast swallow, the presence of an intraluminal bullet highly suggested a thoracic oesophageal injury. DISCUSSION: Non-operative management of intrathoracic oesophageal perforation is controversial. Small perforations or contained leaks diagnosed within 24-48 h in a stable patient with no mediastinitis or empyema can be managed non-operatively with antibiotics and nasogastric feeds. These two case reports support the notion of selective non-operative management of asymptomatic patients with penetrating injury to the oesophagus.

INTRODUCTION: Les traumatismes œsophagiens sont associés à une mortalité et à une morbidité élevées. Pour les blessures œsophagiennes intrathoraciques pénétrantes, la réparation chirurgicale a été la norme pendant plusieurs dizaines d'années, l'objectif étant d'éviter ses conséquences dévastatrices. ÉTUDE DE CAS: Chacun des patients s'est présenté avec une blessure par balle thoraco-abdominale et le projectile toujours présent dans l'abdomen. Bien qu'aucun signe de perforation n'était visible à l'oesophagoscopie ou radiocinématographie de la déglutition, la présence d'une balle en intraluminal suggère fortement une blessure œsophagienne au niveau du thorax. DISCUSSION: La prise en charge non opératoire de la performation œsophagienne intrathoracique est controversée. Les petites perforations ou fuites contenues diagnostiquées dans les 24 à 48 heures chez un patient stable sans médiastinite ou empyème peuvent être prises en charge de manière non opératoire à l'aide d'antibiotiques et d'une sonde nasogastrique. Ces deux études de cas privilégient la notion de prise en charge non opératoire sélective pour les patients asymptomatiques souffrant de blessure pénétrante à l'œsophage.

Management of blunt liver trauma in 134 severely injured patients.

BACKGROUND: In haemodynamic stable patients without an acute abdomen, nonoperative management (NOM) of blunt liver injuries (BLI) has become the standard of care with a reported success rate of between 80 and 100%. Concern has been expressed about the potential overuse of NOM and the fact that failed NOM is associated with higher mortality rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors that might indicate the need for surgical intervention, and to assess the efficacy of NOM. METHODS: A single centre prospective study between 2008 and 2013 in a level-1 Trauma Centre. One hundred thirty four patients with BLI were diagnosed on CT-scan or at laparotomy. The median ISS was 25 (range 16-34). RESULTS: Thirty five (26%) patients underwent an early exploratory laparotomy. The indication for surgery was haemodynamic instability in 11 (31%) patients, an acute abdomen in 16 (46%), and 8 (23%) patients had CT findings of intraabdominal injuries, other than the hepatic injury, that required surgical repair. NOM was initiated in 99 (74%) patients, 36 patients had associated intraabdominal solid organ injuries. Seven patients developed liver related complications. Five (5%) patients required a delayed laparotomy (liver related (3), splenic injury (2)). NOM failure was not related to the presence of shock on admission (p=1000), to the grade of liver injury (p=0.790) or associated intraabdominal injuries (p=0.866). CONCLUSION: Physiologic behaviour or CT findings dictated the need for operative intervention. NOM of BLI has a high success rate (95%). Nonoperative management of BLI should be considered in patients who respond to resuscitation, irrespective of the grade of liver trauma. Associated intraabdominal solid organ injuries do not exclude NOM.

A straight left heart border: a new radiological sign of a hemopericardium.

BACKGROUND: Detection of a cardiac injury in a stable patient after a penetrating chest injury can be difficult. Ultrasound of the pericardial sac may be associated with a false negative result in the presence of a hemothorax. A filling in of the left heart border inferior to the pulmonary artery, called the straight left heart border (SLHB), is a radiological sign on chest X-ray that we have found to be associated with the finding of a hemopericardium at surgery. The aim of the present study was to determine if this was a reliable and reproducible sign. METHODS: This was a prospective study of patients with a penetrating chest injury admitted between 1 October 2001 and 28 February 2009, who had no indication for immediate surgery, and were taken to the operating room for creation of a subxiphoid pericardial window (SPW). The chest X-ray was reviewed by a single trauma surgeon prior to surgery. RESULTS: A total of 162 patients with a possible occult cardiac injury underwent creation of a SPW. Fifty-five of the 162 patients (34 %) were noted to have a SLHB on chest X-ray and a hemopericardium confirmed at SPW. The sensitivity of the SLHB sign was 40 %; specificity, 84 %; and positive predictive value, 89 %. (p = 0.005, Odds ratio 3.48, lower 1.41, upper 8.62). CONCLUSIONS: The straight left heart border is a newly described radiological sign that was highly significant in predicting the presence of a hemopericardium and should alert the clinician to a possible occult cardiac injury.