Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 46(7): 947-53, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18624617

ABSTRACT

Since bacterial infection of the recipient has become the most frequent infection risk in transfusion medicine, suitable methods for bacteria detection in blood components are of great interest. Platelet concentrates are currently the focus of attention, as they are stored under temperature conditions, which enable the multiplication of most bacteria species contaminating blood donations. Rapid methods for bacteria detection allow testing immediately before transfusion in a bed-side like manner. This approach would overcome the sampling error observed in early sampling combined with culturing of bacteria and would, at least, prevent the transfusion of highly contaminated blood components leading to acute septic shock or even death of the patient. Flow cytometry has been demonstrated to be a rapid and feasible approach for detection of bacteria in platelet concentrates. The general aim of the current study was to develop protocols for the application of this technique under routine conditions. The effect of improved test reagents on practicability and sensitivity of the method is evaluated. Furthermore, the implementation of fluorescent absolute count beads as an internal standard is demonstrated. A simplified pre-incubation procedure has been undertaken to diminish the detection limit in a pragmatic manner. Additionally, the application of bacteria detection by flow cytometry as a culture method is shown, i.e., transfer of samples from platelet concentrates into a satellite bag, incubation of the latter at 37 degrees C, and measuring the contaminating bacteria in a flow cytometer.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Sensitivity and Specificity
2.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 46(7): 963-5, 2008.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18624618

ABSTRACT

Today, sterility of established parenteral drugs including biologicals, such as plasma derived products, is practically guaranteed. Bacterially contaminated products are extremely rare exceptions owing to the efficiency of the manufacturing processes in the pharmaceutical industry. In contrast, the manufacturing processes of cell based medicinal products or tissue preparations show much less defined conditions. The sterility of source materials cannot be guaranteed in many cases. As a rule, these source materials cannot be sterilised, as it holds true for the final products. Furthermore, the established methods for sterility testing are not applicable for cell preparations. Sterility of a restricted sample does not guarantee sterility of the whole preparation. Thus, small amounts of residual bacteria in the product can be overlooked and can grow up to enormous numbers during storage and shipping of cell based medicinal products. Considering these problems, there are some parallels in the warranty of microbial safety of cellular blood components. Therefore, the experiences collected in transfusion medicine in the past decade can be successfully used in the production of cell based medicinal products. Comparable to the situation regarding cellular blood components, there is a need for new principles in rapid bacteria detection.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Blood Cells/microbiology , Cells/microbiology , Safety , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Blood Banks , Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Humans
3.
Transfusion ; 46(8): 1367-73, 2006 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16934073

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Bacterial screening of all produced platelet concentrates (PCs) is implemented in many countries to reduce the risk of transfusion-transmitted sepsis. This study compares three rapid bacterial detection methods by imitating real-life conditions. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The sensitivity of a solid-phase scanning cytometer (optimized Scansystem, Hemosystem), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis, and 16S RNA in-house nucleic acid testing (NAT) was evaluated by spiking PCs with four transfusion relevant bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Escherichia coli ). Two different inocula (10 colony-forming units [CFUs]/mL and 10 CFUs/bag) were used to simulate real-life conditions. Samples were taken at 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours after spiking. RESULTS: With the high inoculum, NAT had a 100 percent rate of positive testing for all four types of bacteria (10/10 replicates) at each time point. With the exception of E. coli, the sensitivity of FACS and optimized Scansystem was comparable for the high inoculum. With the low inoculum, 60 percent of E. coli, 80 percent of B. cereus, 90 percent of K. pneumoniae, and 100 percent of S. aureus were NAT-positive 12 hours after spiking. In contrast, only 20 percent of E. coli, 10 percent of B. cereus, and 70 percent of K. pneumoniae were FACS-positive with the low inoculum 12 hours after spiking. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, the preliminary data revealed a higher sensitivity for NAT in comparison to FACS and optimized Scansystem under the defined study conditions. To imitate real-life conditions, further spiking studies with a low inoculum (10 CFUs/bag) and slower growing organisms should be conducted to examine the sensitivity of available detection systems.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Blood Platelets , Flow Cytometry , Platelet Transfusion , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/blood , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Sepsis/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/blood , Bacterial Infections/diagnosis , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Colony Count, Microbial , Flow Cytometry/instrumentation , Flow Cytometry/methods , Humans , Platelet Transfusion/adverse effects , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Sensitivity and Specificity , Sepsis/blood , Sepsis/diagnosis , Sepsis/etiology , Sepsis/transmission
4.
Transfusion ; 46(3): 486-91, 2006 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16533294

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In general the bacterial count in freshly donated blood is low and even lower in the corresponding platelet concentrates (PCs). By use of flow cytometry (FACS) for sterility testing, the reliability of early versus later sampling times was evaluated. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Blood donations were spiked with various numbers of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Bacillus cereus, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. The corresponding PCs were prepared by the buffy-coat method and stored at 22 degrees C. A 20-mL sample was collected from each PC directly after preparation and after 8 hours. Samples were stored at 35 degrees C. Sterility testing of both PCs and samples was by FACS analysis at different time points. RESULTS: All stored PCs were found positive by FACS analysis, with detection times ranging between 8 and 24 hours (K. pneumoniae, B. cereus), 8 and 91 hours (S. aureus), and 144 hours (S. epidermidis). In the samples incubated at 35 degrees C, bacteria were detected after 8 to 19 hours (K. pneumoniae, B. cereus), 8 to 67 hours (S. aureus), and 19 to 43 hours (S. epidermidis). Some of the samples did not contain bacteria. CONCLUSION: Detection times for slow-growing bacteria are significantly shortened when PC samples are incubated at 35 degrees C: the numbers of bacteria in freshly prepared PCs may, however, be so low that the samples drawn for sterility testing do not contain a single bacterium. Our results do not support a shortening of the 24-hour or greater sampling time recommended by the manufacturers of established test systems, because also for consistent detection by FACS, bacteria need to grow in the PCs to sufficient numbers.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/cytology , Bacterial Infections , Blood Donors , Blood Platelets/cytology , Bacteria/growth & development , Bacteriological Techniques , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Blood Preservation/methods , Female , Flow Cytometry/methods , Hot Temperature , Humans , Infection Control/methods , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Time Factors
5.
Transfusion ; 46(1): 41-9, 2006 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16398729

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Flow cytometry (FACS) is a common technique in blood banking. It is used, for example, for the enumeration of residual white blood cells in plasma and in cellular blood products. It was investigated whether it can also be applied for sterility testing of buffy coat-derived platelet concentrates (PCs). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Plasma-reduced PCs were spiked with bacteria and stored at 20 to 24 or 37 degrees C for various times. The following 10 species were used: Bacillus cereus, Enterobacter cloacae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Propionibacterium acnes, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Serratia marcescens, and Yersinia enterocolitica. Bacterial DNA was stained with thiazole orange. After the platelets were lysed, bacteria were enumerated by FACS. RESULTS: All bacteria species used were detectable by FACS. The lower detection limit was approximately 100 bacteria per microL, that is, 10(5) per mL. In general, the titers measured were 1.2- to 3-fold higher than those determined by colony forming assay. In one case (K. pneumoniae) in which the dot plot of the bacteria cloud overlapped with that of bacteria debris, they were consistently lower. When PC samples were inoculated with approximately 1 colony-forming unit per mL of bacteria and kept at 37 degrees C, most species were detected within 21 hours or less. Exceptions were E. cloacae and P. acnes, which were detected after 24 to 40 and 64 hours, respectively. At 20 to 24 degrees C, the detection times were strongly prolonged. CONCLUSION: Sterility testing of PCs by FACS is a feasible approach. The present data suggest incubating PC samples for 20 to 24 hours at 37 degrees C before testing. For slow-growing bacteria, the incubation period must be prolonged by 1 to 2 days.


Subject(s)
Bacteria , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Flow Cytometry , Bacteriological Techniques , Blood Banks , Drug Contamination/prevention & control , Humans , Platelet Transfusion , Sensitivity and Specificity
6.
Vox Sang ; 89(3): 135-9, 2005 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16146505

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prevention and detection of bacterial contamination of platelet concentrates remains a major challenge for transfusion medicine. To be suitable for blood-transfusion services, the contamination detection method must be highly sensitive, easy to perform and preferably of low cost. In this spiking study, we evaluated the new optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit detection method for use on apheresis platelets. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Apheresis platelet concentrates (APCs) were individually spiked with 10 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml of one of 10 different strains of bacteria. The spiked APCs were analysed at specific time-points during incubation by using the optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit. Bacterial enumeration was performed by plating onto blood agar. RESULTS: All the bacterial strains tested were detected by using the optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit when sampled 24 h after spiking. Compared to the Scansystem standard kit, sensitivity was increased to < 50 CFU/ml. The identity of the spiked bacteria was confirmed by Gram staining and DNA fingerprinting. CONCLUSION: The optimized Scansystem Platelet Kit was able to reliably detect, within 70 min, 10 transfusion-relevant bacterial species in APCs when a sample volume was taken 24 h after spiking. This is the first study carried out by using the optimized Scansystem bacterial detection that was found to have an enhanced sensitivity compared to the standard kit.


Subject(s)
Bacteria/isolation & purification , Blood Platelets/microbiology , Platelet Transfusion/standards , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Humans , Plateletpheresis/standards , Quality Control , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic/standards , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...