Vaginal lacerations during laparoscopic hysterectomy for endometrial cancer and local recurrence risk.

Objective: Laparoscopic surgery (MIS) offers equivalent oncologic outcomes as compared to open surgery, while causing lesser morbidity and resulting in a faster recovery. Vaginal extraction of specimens may cause vaginal or perineal lacerations (VL). The objective of this retrospective study was to assess local recurrence rates compared between cases with vaginal laceration (VL) or without vaginal lacerations (NL). Methods: We identified patients with endometrial cancer who underwent MIS between 2014 and 2018. We assessed the rate of local recurrence between patients in VL and NL cohorts. The study included all histologic subtypes and stages while benign final pathology, synchronous primaries or cases that required laparotomy for extraction were excluded. Results: 338 MIS cases were evaluable of which 40 cases had a vaginal laceration during specimen extraction. There was no significant difference in age, race, presence of LVSI, stage, grade, histology or use of vaginal brachytherapy between cohorts. Cases with vaginal lacerations were significantly associated with a higher median BMI and larger uterine size. The VL cohort was more likely to have received adjuvant treatment. In early stage disease, more cases had non-endometrioid histology in the VL group and had increased incidence of chemotherapy and radiation use as well. There were no cases of isolated vaginal recurrence (0/40) in the VL group as compared to an incidence of 2 % (7/298) in the NL group with a relative risk of 0.48 (CI: 0.03-8.36, p = 0.62). There were 4 cases of pelvic recurrence (4/40) in the VL group and 2 cases in the NL group (2/298) with a relative risk of 2.13 (CI: 0.46-9.89, p = 0.34). Conclusions: In endometrial cancer cases, we did not observe a significantly increased risk of vaginal or pelvic recurrence after a vaginal laceration at the time of specimen removal.

Case Report: Low-Risk HPV associated Verruco-Papillary squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix.

•Cervical cancer plays a large role in morbidity and mortality for gynecologic cancer.•Most cases are involved with high-risk HPV, rare cases of low-risk HPV associated cancer exists.•Low risk HPV associated cervical cancers have increased difficulty in diagnosis.•No distinction exists in treatment between low and high risk HPV associated cervical cancer.

Surgery in Advanced Ovary Cancer: Primary versus Interval Cytoreduction.

Primary debulking surgery (PDS) has remained the only treatment of ovarian cancer with survival advantage since its development in the 1970s. However, survival advantage is only observed in patients who are optimally resected. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) has emerged as an alternative for patients in whom optimal resection is unlikely and/or patients with comorbidities at high risk for perioperative complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence to date for PDS and NACT in the treatment of stage III/IV ovarian carcinoma. We systematically searched the PubMed database for relevant articles. Prior to 2010, NACT was reserved for non-surgical candidates. After publication of EORTC 55971, the first randomized trial demonstrating non-inferiority of NACT followed by interval debulking surgery, NACT was considered in a wider breadth of patients. Since EORTC 55971, 3 randomized trials-CHORUS, JCOG0602, and SCORPION-have studied NACT versus PDS. While CHORUS supported EORTC 55971, JCOG0602 failed to demonstrate non-inferiority and SCORPION failed to demonstrate superiority of NACT. Despite conflicting data, a subset of patients would benefit from NACT while preserving survival including poor surgical candidates and inoperable disease. Further randomized trials are needed to assess the role of NACT.

Kisspeptin as a new serum biomarker to discriminate miscarriage from viable intrauterine pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To validate the ability of serum kisspeptin-54 to discriminate between first-trimester viable pregnancies and miscarriages. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Academic medical centers. PATIENT(S): Women with confirmed viable intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) at estimated gestational age 6-10 weeks (n = 20), women with confirmed miscarriage (spontaneous abortion [SAB]) at estimated gestational age 6-10 weeks (n = 20), and nonpregnant women (n = 19). INTERVENTION(S): Collection of serum samples from women with confirmed IUP, SAB, and nonpregnant women for the measurement of serum kisspeptin and serum hCG levels. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Serum kisspeptin and hCG. RESULT(S): The limit of detection was 0.024 ng/mL; intra- and interassay coefficients of variation were 5.1% and 8.6%, respectively. Kisspeptin levels differed between the pregnant and nonpregnant state and by viability. Kisspeptin levels were positively associated with gestational age. There was also a significant positive association with hCG in SAB, but not in IUP. CONCLUSION(S): Plasma levels of kisspeptin have been suggested as a biomarker for miscarriage. This study demonstrates kisspeptin assay stability in serum and its potential clinical utility as a biomarker for early pregnancy viability.