Clinic Time Required for Remote and In-Person Management of Patients With Cardiac Devices: Time and Motion Workflow Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: The number of patients with cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) is increasing, creating a substantial workload for device clinics. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to characterize the workflow and quantify clinic staff time requirements for managing patients with CIEDs. METHODS: A time and motion workflow evaluation was performed in 11 US and European CIEDs clinics. Workflow tasks were repeatedly timed during 1 business week of observation at each clinic; these observations included all device models and manufacturers. The mean cumulative staff time required to review a remote device transmission and an in-person clinic visit were calculated, including all necessary clinical and administrative tasks. The annual staff time to manage a patient with a CIED was modeled using CIED transmission volumes, clinical guidelines, and the published literature. RESULTS: A total of 276 in-person clinic visits and 2173 remote monitoring activities were observed. Mean staff time required per remote transmission ranged from 9.4 to 13.5 minutes for therapeutic devices (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and cardiac resynchronization therapy) and from 11.3 to 12.9 minutes for diagnostic devices such as insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs). Mean staff time per in-person visit ranged from 37.8 to 51.0 and from 39.9 to 45.8 minutes for therapeutic devices and ICMs, respectively. Including all remote and in-person follow-ups, the estimated annual time to manage a patient with a CIED ranged from 1.6 to 2.4 hours for therapeutic devices and from 7.7 to 9.3 hours for ICMs. CONCLUSIONS: The CIED patient management workflow is complex and requires significant staff time. Understanding process steps and time requirements informs the implementation of efficiency improvements, including remote solutions. Future research should examine heterogeneity in patient management processes to identify the most efficient workflow.

Pacemaker complications and costs: a nationwide economic study.

Aims: Novel leadless pacemakers (LPMs) may reduce complications and associated costs related to conventional pacemaker systems. This study sought to estimate the incidence and associated costs of traditional pacemaker complications, in those patients who were eligible for LPM implantation. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the French National Hospital Database (PMSI), including all patients implanted with a pacemaker in France in 2012, who could have alternatively received an LPM. Complication rates and their associated costs 3 years post-implantation were estimated from the perspective of the French social security system. Results: From a total of 65,553 patients, 11,770 (18%) met the inclusion criteria. Overall, 618 patients (5.3%) had a record of pacemaker complications during follow-up, of which 89% were related to the lead and pocket. Most common were pocket bleeding, lead- or generator-related mechanical complications, and pneumothorax. Overall, the mean cost of pacemaker complications per patient was €6,674 ± 3,867 at 3 years. Specifically, €7,143 ± 2,685 for pocket bleeding, €5,123 ± 2,676 for pneumothorax, and €6,020 ± 3,272 for mechanical complications. Conclusions: Major complications associated with the lead and pocket of conventional pacemaker systems are still common, and these represent a significant burden to healthcare systems as they generate substantial costs.

Complications and associated healthcare costs of transvenous cardiac pacemakers in Germany.

Aim: This study evaluated the occurrence and associated costs of pacemaker complications in Germany from 2010 to 2013. Patients & methods: Patients with a de novo or replacement implantation of a single or dual chamber pacemaker between 2010 and 2013 were followed for 12 months post-implant using German health insurance claims data. A case-control analysis was performed using propensity score matching to estimate the costs of complications. Results: Out of 12,922 implanted patients, 12.0% had a complication in the year following the implant. Complications related to lead and pocket were found in 10.2% of all implanted patients; infections occurred in 1.7% patients. Healthcare costs up to 36 months post complication were on average €4627 higher than for pacemaker patients without a complication. Conclusion: Pacemaker complications are common and represent a burden for patients and healthcare systems generating substantial costs. Most of the pacemaker complications involved the pacing lead or pacemaker pocket.

Patients With Ischemic Stroke and Incident Atrial Fibrillation: A Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A substantial part of ischemic strokes is attributed to atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that patients with ischemic stroke without prior diagnosed AF were at higher risk of having a subsequent diagnosis of AF, and this was associated with multiple risk factors. METHODS: This French longitudinal cohort study was based on the national database covering hospital care from 2008 to 2012 for the entire population. RESULTS: Of 65 807 patients with ischemic stroke in 2009, 48 992 did not have AF at baseline. A total of 4828 of these patients were diagnosed as having AF during a follow-up of 15±15 months (incidence rate 7.9 per 100 person-years). By comparison, the yearly rate of new-onset AF for the 826 416 patients with a cardiac hospitalization was 5.9%. CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack) and CHA2DS2-VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes mellitus, stroke/transient ischemic attack [doubled], vascular disease, age 65-75 years, and sex category [female]) scores were both associated with the risk of new-onset AF during follow-up (CHADS2: hazard ratio [HR] 1.70, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.66-1.75; CHA2DS2-VASc: HR 1.45, 95% CI 1.42-1.48). The c statistics were 0.700 (95% CI 0.696-0.706) for CHADS2 and 0.706 (95% CI 0.702-0.710) with CHA2DS2-VASc (P=0.003 for comparison of the 2 scores). Independent predictors of subsequent diagnosis of AF were age 65 to 74 years (HR 2.29, 95% CI 2.06-2.54), age ≥75 years (HR 3.31, 95% CI 3.02-3.64), hypertension (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.13-1.32), heart failure (HR 2.56, 95% CI 2.41-2.72), and vascular disease (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: Ischemic stroke was associated with a substantially increased risk of incident AF, particularly among individuals with higher CHADS2 or CHA2DS2-VASc scores. These risk scores seem to be simple tools for identifying patients at higher risk of incident AF after ischemic stroke.

A global overview of health insurance administrative costs: what are the reasons for variations found?

OBJECTIVES: Administrative costs are an important spending category in total health insurance expenditure. Yet, they have rarely been a topic outside the US and there is no cross-country comparison available. This paper provides a global overview and analysis of administrative costs for social security schemes (SSS) and private health insurance schemes (PHI). METHODS: The analysis is based on data of the World Health Organization (WHO) National Health Accounts (NHA) and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) System of Health Accounts (SHA). These are the only worldwide databases on health expenditure data. Further data was retrieved from a literature search. Administrative costs are presented as a share of total health insurance costs. RESULTS: Data is available for 58 countries. In high-income OECD countries, the average SSS administrative costs are 4.2%. Average PHI administrative costs are about three times higher. The shares are much higher for low- and middle-income countries. However, considerable variations across and within countries over time are revealed. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Seven explanatory factors are explored to explain the variations: health financing system aspects, administrative activities undertaken, insurance design aspects, context factors, reporting format, accounting methods, and management and administrative efficiency measures. More detailed reporting of administrative costs would enhance comparability and provide benchmarks. Improved administrative efficiency could free resources to expand coverage.