ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) tool, validated for measuring postoperative recovery following scheduled surgeries, has not been psychometrically assessed in emergency contexts. Moreover, the QoR-15's associations with long-term outcomes remain underexplored. This study aimed to confirm the validity and reliability of the QoR-15 following emergency surgery and assess its association with three-month postoperative quality of life. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study (August 2021-April 2022) on adult patients who underwent emergency surgery. The QoR-15 questionnaire was administered before surgery (H0) and at 24 hr (H24) and 48 hr (H48) after surgery. We examined the H24 score's associations with both the three-month quality of life, as assessed by the EQ-5D scale, and the number of days spent at home at 30 (DAH30) and 90 (DAH90) days. RESULTS: Of the 375 included patients, 352 (94%) completed the QoR-15 at H24 and 338 (90%) were followed up at three months. The population represented the following diverse surgical specialties: orthopedic (51%), gastrointestinal (27%), urologic (13%), and others (9%). The QoR-15 questionnaire confirmed all psychometric qualities (internal consistency, reproducibility, responsiveness, acceptability, construct, and convergent validities) in the emergency context. The average minimum clinical difference was 8.0 at H24. There was an association between QoR-15 at H24 and the three-month quality of life (r = 0.24; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14 to 0.34; P < 0.001), DAH30 (r = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.23 to 0.41; P < 0.001), and DAH90 (r = 0.31; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.40; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The QoR-15 score is valid for measuring early postoperative recovery after emergency surgery. The H24 score significantly correlated with both the three-month quality of life and the number of days at home. STUDY REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04845763); first submitted 11 April 2021.
RéSUMé: OBJECTIF: L'outil Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15), validé pour mesurer la récupération postopératoire après des chirurgies programmées, n'a pas fait l'objet d'une évaluation psychométrique dans des contextes d'urgence. De plus, l'association entre les réponses au QoR-15 et les devenirs à long terme demeure peu explorée. Cette étude visait à confirmer la validité et la fiabilité du QoR-15 après une chirurgie d'urgence et à évaluer son association avec la qualité de vie postopératoire à trois mois. MéTHODE: Nous avons mené une étude de cohorte prospective (août 2021-avril 2022) auprès de patient·es adultes ayant bénéficié d'une intervention chirurgicale d'urgence. Le questionnaire QoR-15 a été administré avant la chirurgie (H0), ainsi que 24 (H24) et 48 heures (H48) après la chirurgie. Nous avons examiné les associations du score à H24 avec la qualité de vie à trois mois, telle qu'évaluée par l'échelle EQ-5D, et le nombre de jours passés à la maison à 30 (DAH30) et 90 (DAH90) jours. RéSULTATS: Sur les 375 patient·es inclus·es, 352 (94 %) ont complété le QoR-15 à H24 et 338 (90 %) ont bénéficié d'un suivi à trois mois. La population représentait les diverses spécialités chirurgicales suivantes : orthopédique (51 %), gastro-intestinale (27 %), urologique (13 %) et autres (9 %). Le questionnaire QoR-15 a confirmé toutes les qualités psychométriques (cohérence interne, reproductibilité, réactivité, acceptabilité, construit et validités convergentes) dans le contexte de l'urgence. La différence clinique minimale moyenne était de 8,0 à H24. Il y avait une association entre le QoR-15 à H24 et la qualité de vie à trois mois (r = 0,24; intervalle de confiance à 95 % [IC], 0,14 à 0,34; P < 0,001), le DAH30 (r = 0,33; IC 95 %, 0,23 à 0,41; P < 0,001) et le DAH90 (r = 0,31; IC 95 %, 0,22 à 0,40; P < 0,001). CONCLUSION: Le score QoR-15 est valable pour mesurer la récupération postopératoire précoce après une intervention chirurgicale d'urgence. Le score à H24 était significativement corrélé à la fois à la qualité de vie à trois mois et au nombre de jours passés à la maison. ENREGISTREMENT DE L'éTUDE: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04845763); soumis pour la première fois le 11 avril 2021.
Subject(s)
Anesthesia Recovery Period , Quality of Life , Adult , Humans , Reproducibility of Results , Prospective Studies , Surveys and QuestionnairesSubject(s)
High Fidelity Simulation Training , Simulation Training , Humans , Prospective Studies , Cognition , HospitalsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The quality of information during a medical visit, such as a preoperative anesthesia visit, impacts patient's satisfaction. New digital supports, including humanoid robots, have been recently proposed to provide medical information to patients. We aimed to assess whether the presence of a PEPPER humanoid robot, programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery and placed in the waiting room for a preoperative anesthesia visit, can improve patient overall satisfaction. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, observational, before-after study. French-speaking adult patient global satisfaction (rated from 0 to 10) was measured after a scheduled preoperative anesthesia visit (for orthopedic, abdominal, urologic surgeries or for endoscopy), by direct interview with a research person, before modification of usual practices (information leaflets and brochure were given to the patients prior to the visit), and after the implementation in the waiting room of a PEPPER humanoid robot programmed to deliver information about anesthesia and surgery through short videos, designed by a group of healthcare workers and patients. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-six patients (237 [80%] ASA I-II) were included, 179 before and 117 after periods. Patient global satisfaction was not different (8.9±1.6 vs. 9.0±1.4/10, for before and after periods, P=0.53). However, the satisfaction on the information about risks was significantly improved in the after period (8.5±2.3 vs. 9.1±1.4/10, P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a humanoid PEPPER robot in the waiting room did not improve patient's global satisfaction about anesthesia visit.
