Quantitative biomarkers for liver metastases: comparison of MRI diffusion-weighted imaging heterogeneity index and fluorine-18-fluoro-deoxyglucose standardised uptake value in hybrid PET/MR.

AIM: To investigate the ability of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) heterogeneity index to discriminate liver metastases (LM) from normal-appearing liver (NAL) tissue as compared to common magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics, and to investigate its correlation with 2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (18F-FDG) positron-emission tomography (PET) standardised uptake value (SUV). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine liver metastases in 24 oncology patients (13 women, 11 men; mean age 56±13 years) with proven LM from heterogeneous sources were evaluated on a PET/MRI system. Abdominal sequences included Dixon and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) protocols with simultaneous PET. Tissue heterogeneity was calculated using the coefficient of variance (CV) of the ADC, and compared in LM and in NAL tissue of the same volume in an adjacent portion of the liver. The correlations between various ADC measures and PET SUV in distinguishing LM from NAL were evaluated. RESULTS: A good correlation was found between ADCcv and SUVpeak (r=0.712). Moderate inverse correlation was found between ADCmin and SUVpeak (r=-0.536), and a weak inverse correlation between ADCmean and SUVpeak (r=-0.273). There was a significant difference between LM and NAL when ADCcv (p<0.0001) and ADCmin (p=0.001) were used. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of SUV, ADCcv, ADCmin, and ADCmean produced an AUC of 0.989, 0.900, 0.742, and 0.623 respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The ADCcv index is a potential biomarker of LM with better correlation to 18F-FDG PET SUVpeak than conventional MRI metrics, and may serve to quantitatively discriminate between LM and NAL.

Early 68GA-PSMA PET/MRI acquisition: assessment of lesion detectability and PET metrics in patients with prostate cancer undergoing same-day late PET/CT.

AIM: To compare lesion detectability and positron-emission tomography (PET) metric measurements between early-PET/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) acquisition and same-day PET/computed tomography (CT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study was approved by the institutional review board and written informed consent was obtained from all patients. Twenty-one patients underwent non-time-of-flight (TOF) PET/MRI immediately following 68GA-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracer injection in two steps: firstly, early prostate PET/MRI (pPET/MRI) and early whole-body (WB) PET/MRI (wbPET/MR) followed by WB TOF PET/CT (wbPET/CT). Lesion detectability was compared between wbPET/MRI and wbPET/CT while PET metric measurements were compared between pPET/MR, wbPET/MRI, and wbPET/CT. RESULTS: Sixty-one and 63 lesions were found on wbPET/MRI and wbPET/CT, respectively (K=0.95, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.89-1.0) with very good correlation between PET metric measurements (r=0.91; p=0.001). Bland-Altman plots demonstrated a mean percentage difference between wbPET/CT with wbPET/MRI of 34.4% with 95% limits of agreement (LOA) between -39% to 107.9% for metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and a mean difference of 30% with LOA between -13.4% to 73.4% for peak standardised uptake value (SUVpeak). CONCLUSION: Early PET/MRI demonstrates very good lesion detectability agreement and correlation with PET metrics compared to same-day PET/CT. Nevertheless, LOA are far beyond the clinically acceptable range, and therefore, PET/CT and early PET/MRI metrics cannot be used interchangeably.

The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT on Staging and Prognosis in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated 18F-FDG PET/CT in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) staging and assessed metabolic (SUVmax, MTV and TLG) and morphologic (CTvol) variables as predictors for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed, histopathology-confirmed SCLC, who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT were evaluated. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to determine the association between the primary tumour SUVmax, MTV, TLG and CTvol with OS and PFS. Similar evaluations were performed when hilar/mediastinal lymphadenopathy was included [total SUVmax (TSUVmax), total MTV (TMTV) and total TLG (TTLG)]. RESULTS: 55 patients were included. 18F-FDG PET/CT changed staging in 6/55 (10.9%) patients who were upstaged to extensive disease. TTLG (>443.8) was a significant variable for OS with HR=2.1 (CI 1.14-3.871, p=0.017). Patients with TTLG>443.8 had a median OS of 13.4 months compared to 25.7 months in patients with TTLG<443.8 (p=0.018). TMTV (>72.4) was significant for PFS with HR=2.3 (CI 1.11-4.8, p=0.025). A median PFS of 12.1 and 26.2 months was found with TMTV greater and less than 72.4, respectively (p=0.005). CONCLUSIONS: 18F-FDG PET/CT improved staging of patients with SCLC, and TTLG and TMTV can be used as prognostic variables for OS and PFS, respectively. KEY POINTS: • Identifying variables that predict the prognosis of patients with SCLC is important. • 18F-FDG PET/CT influences staging of patients with SCLC. • Metabolic parameters could be used as predictors for PFS and OS.

Comparison of 80 and 120 kVp contrast-enhanced CT for attenuation correction in PET/CT, using quantitative analysis and reporter assessment of PET image quality.

AIM: To determine the effect of low tube voltage on positron-emission tomography (PET) image quality, quantitative analysis, and radiation dose in a combined PET/computed tomography (CT) study in patients with normal body mass index (BMI). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-nine examinations performed in 46 patients (mean age 57 years), who had at least two separate studies were retrospectively evaluated; at least one with 120 kVp and one with 80 kVp. Three independent readers reviewed all PET images and graded the image quality. PET signal and noise were recorded on the liver, spleen, fat, bone marrow, and aorta. CT dose index (CTDI) and the dose-length product (DLP) were used for CT radiation dose estimation. A mixed-effects model analysis was used for comparison of estimated radiation dose and PET data. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease of 15% in the radiation dose estimates between 80 and 120 kVp (DLP 946.2 ± 189 versus 1157.0 ± 236, respectively; p < 0.001). There was an increase of 12% in PET signal in the normal liver with 80 kVp. The average score of PET image quality obtained between 80 and 120 kVp was 4.85 ± 0.42 versus 4.90 ± 0.27, respectively (p = 0.47). CONCLUSION: PET/80 kVp CT has no statistically significant difference in the PET image quality and quantitative analysis compared to PET/120 kVp and may be used in selected patients to reduce the radiation dose.