Acute Chest Pain­Diagnostic Accuracy and Pre-Hospital Use of Anticoagulants and Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors

BACKGROUND: Acute chest pain (aCP) can be a symptom of life-threatening diseases such as acute coronary or aortic syndrome, but often has a non-cardiac cause. The recommendations regarding pre-hospital drug treatment of patients with aCP are ambiguous. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted of 822 patients with aCP who were attended by emergency physicians. The cause of aCP was classified as follows: acute coronary syndrome without ST-segment elevation (NSTE-ACS), acute aortic syndrome, hypertensive crisis, cardiac arrhythmias, musculoskeletal, or other. The suspected and discharge diagnoses were compared, and the pre-hospital administration of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and unfractionated heparin (UFH) was analyzed. Furthermore, the parameters that improved diagnostic accuracy were investigated. RESULTS: The positive predictive value of the diagnosis assigned by the emergency physician (EP diagnosis) was 39.7%. NSTEACS was the most commonly suspected cause of aCP (74.7%), but was confirmed after hospital admission in only 26.3% of patients. ASA was administered in 51%, UFH in 55%, and both substances in 46.4% of cases. A large proportion of patients received anticoagulants in the pre-hospital setting although the discharge diagnosis was not NSTE-ACS: ASA 62.9%, UFH 66.0%, both substances 56.5%. CONCLUSION: ASA and UFH are often given to EP-accompanied patients with aCP despite the low accuracy of diagnosis in the pre-hospital setting. Pre-hospital measurement of high-sensitivity troponin T (hs Trop-T) might improve discrimination between NSTE-ACS and other causes of aCP. This is important, as the current guidelines contain no clear recommendations for prehospital drug treatment in NSTE-ACS.

Coronary angiography after cardiac arrest without ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a network meta-analysis.

AIMS: This network meta-analysis aimed to assess the effect of early coronary angiography (CAG) compared with selective CAG (late and no CAG) for patients after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest without ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTE-OHCA). METHODS AND RESULTS: A systematic literature search was performed using the EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science databases without restrictions on publication date. The last search was performed on 15 July 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRS) comparing the effect of early CAG to selective CAG after NSTE-OHCA on survival and/or neurological outcomes were included. Meta-analyses were performed based on a DerSimonian-Laird random effects model. A total of 18 studies were identified by the literature search. After the exclusion of two studies due to high risk of bias, 16 studies (six RCTs, ten NRS) were included in the final analyses. Meta-analyses showed a statistically significant increase in survival after early CAG compared with selective CAG in the overall analysis [OR: 1.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): (1.12-1.76), P < 0.01, I2 = 68%]. This effect was lost in the subgroup analysis of RCTs [OR: 0.89, 95% CI: (0.73-1.10), P = 0.29, I2 = 0%]. Random effects model network meta-analysis of NRS based on a Bayesian method showed statistically significant increased survival after late compared with early CAG [OR: 4.20, 95% CI: (1.22, 20.91)]. CONCLUSION: The previously reported superiority of early CAG after NSTE-OHCA is based on NRS at high risk of selection and survivorship bias. The meta-analysis of RCTs does not support routinely performing early CAG after NSTE-OHCA.