Factors affecting implementation of mindfulness in hospital settings: A qualitative meta-synthesis of healthcare professionals' experiences.

Background: Researchers have found that mindfulness-based interventions can reduce stress and improve mental health in healthcare professionals, as well as support relationship building, communication, and compassionate care. However, few researchers have systematically examined what determines successful implementation in hospital settings, which is essential for integrating research in clinical practice. Objectives: The aim of this study was to synthesize qualitative data regarding healthcare professionals' experiences of factors affecting implementation of mindfulness in hospital settings and outline recommendations for clinical practice. Design: A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative studies. Data sources: A systematic search was conducted in six databases; Scopus, PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO (Ovid), Web of Science, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global. The inclusion criteria were: 1) Healthcare professionals engaged in patient care in hospital settings, 2) Mindfulness-based interventions defined by Crane and colleagues', and 3) Primary studies using a qualitative design. Review methods: Multiple researchers were engaged in screening, quality assessment, data extraction, and interpretation of the results. Thematic synthesis described by Thomas and Harden guided the data analysis. Reporting followed Enhancing Transparency in Reporting the Synthesis of Qualitative Research (ENTREQ). Results: Eighteen studies were included. We identified three overall themes of importance for successful implementation: 1) Buying In, 2) Allocating time and space, and 3) Keeping it going. The results revealed that cultural values, held beliefs about mindfulness, inter-professional relationships, and context-related factors such as time and space could affect implementation of mindfulness in hospital settings. Conclusion: Based on the results, we formulated eight recommendations to guide stakeholders and hospital management in planning implementation of mindfulness in hospital settings. However, to confirm the results, more research where mindfulness implementation is the primary aim is needed.

Who is supporting the parents during their child's cancer treatment? A qualitative study through the lens of compassion.

PURPOSE: Parents of children/adolescents with cancer are placed in a state of severe suffering due to serious concerns, fears, and radical daily life changes. Human support is an important source of support for successful coping. This study explored fundamental aspects of parents' daily, social, and personal life during their child's treatment to deepen our understanding of 'who' plays a significant role in supporting parents, and how, and to what extent this support is provided. METHODS: This qualitative study was undertaken in a compassion paradigm, designed and guided by Heidegger's and Gadamer's philosophy and compassionate methods. Data were generated through ethnographic observations (144 h), focus group interviews (n = 2), and individual/couple interviews (n = 16) at two Danish hospitals. Inductive content analysis was used to analyse data. RESULTS: Overall, support from peers, health professionals, and social networks constituted significant sources of support. Especially peers and health professionals had a continuous support role, which was fundamental for establishing interpersonal closeness and relieving suffering. Sharing responsibilities between parents and among social networks seemed to ease the emotional and practical burden. However, to ensure effectiveness, social networks must be available, outreach, and responsive to needs. Moreover, parents disclosed little self-awareness and resources and options for self-care due to a combination of lack of awareness, time, and space in the hospitals. CONCLUSION: Safeguarding interpersonal and interparental understanding and closeness in parental care is essential. One way is building resilience and a broader human-to-human-based safety net around the family, including social networks and professional psychosocial support, advantageously using compassion.

Feasibility and acceptability of a virtual diagnostic sleep disorders service: A qualitative study.

INTRODUCTION: The electronic collection of patient data is used for a large variety of conditions. The boundaries of its use in initial diagnostics and the extent to which it can replace specialist contact, however, remain vague. Our newly developed virtual diagnostic process for common sleep disorders involves digital questionnaire administration, neurophysiological diagnostic studies, and virtual consultation with a sleep specialist. In this study, we evaluated patients' virtual diagnostic process experiences as part of a full evaluation of this process. METHODS: Patients who completed the virtual diagnostic process participated in online semi-structured interviews based on the following criteria: age ≥ 18 years, no obvious cognitive deficits, and access to the internet. Patients who did not complete the virtual diagnostic process were contacted by telephone and given the opportunity to explain why. RESULTS: Of the 24 patients included, 14 completed the virtual diagnostic process. Most participants understood the concept of the virtual diagnostic process, could navigate the process, and felt that the combined use of a questionnaire and virtual consultation was meaningful. Although participants could provide information as free text, the simplified closed questions, required for diagnostic classification, triggered feelings of insecurity and the inability to sufficiently describe symptoms, thereby evoking concern. All patients deemed the complementary personal contact important. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate that the virtual diagnostic process is feasible and highly accepted by most patients. However, (virtual) personal (telephone or video) contact is mandatory to address patients' concerns. The virtual diagnostic process application evaluated here likely represents the outer limit of the use of electronic data collection in virtual diagnostic procedures.

Central line-associated bloodstream infection in infants admitted to a level lllneonatal intensive care unit.

INTRODUCTION: Central line (CL)-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) is one of the most common and yet preventable hospital-acquired infections in infants admitted to neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and is associated with significant morbidity. The objectives of this retrospective study were to 1) determine the incidence rates of CLABSI in infants admitted to a level lll NICU and to 2) identify independent CLABSI risk factors in high-risk infants. METHODS: Data were collected from patient medical records, and incidence rates were calculated per 1,000 CL days and per 1,000 patient (PT) days. Univariate analyses were performed to identify potential risk factors associated with CLABSI, and those with a p-value ≤ 0.05 were assessed in multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The cohort represented 382 infants in whom 512 CLs were inserted. The CLABSI incidence rates per 1,000 CL days and per 1,000 PT days were 13.41 and 3.18, respectively. The only independent risk factor for CLABSI was prolonged CL dwell-time for the groups of umbilical catheters (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.42 per day (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.15-1.75)) and central venous catheters (aOR = 1.04 per day (95% CI: 1.01-1.07)). CONCLUSION: Compared with other high-income countries, our overall incidence rate seems high. Since units of measurement and the definition used for CLABSI vary between studies, it is important to keep this in mind when comparing findings. Future research should focus on preventative measures in relation to CLs. FUNDING: none Trial registration. not relevant.