Sexual function improves as depressive symptoms decrease during treatment with escitalopram: results of a naturalistic study of patients with major depressive disorder.

BACKGROUND: Major depressive disorder (MDD) is closely associated with sexual dysfunction, which may worsen during treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) due to the side effects of pharmacologic treatment. AIM: To examine the association between sexual function and severity of MDD in drug-naïve patients as compared with healthy controls and how treatment with SSRIs affects sexual function over time in individuals with MDD. Interaction with gender and treatment response was examined. METHODS: In 92 patients with MDD, we measured MDD severity with 6- and 17-item versions of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS6 and HDRS17) and the level of sexual function with the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire at baseline and 4, 8, and 12 weeks after initiating treatment with escitalopram. Baseline sexual function was compared with the sexual function of 73 healthy controls. Linear regression models were used to assess differences in sexual function between healthy controls and patients and change in sexual function from baseline to week 12. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences in change in sexual function between treatment response groups. OUTCOMES: Outcomes included total scores on the HDRS6, HDRS17, and Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire and changes in total scores from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: Unmedicated patients with MDD reported impaired sexual function as compared with healthy controls. Level of sexual function was not associated with severity of MDD at baseline. Patients' sexual function improved significantly during treatment, which was coupled with amelioration of depressive symptoms. Treatment response groups (remitters, intermediate responders, nonresponders) did not predict change in sexual function. Gender had no effect on sexual dysfunction symptoms during treatment. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Major depression is a risk factor for sexual problems, and improvement in sexual function was coupled with amelioration of depressive symptoms. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS: Among its strengths, this was a naturalistic study reflecting real-world settings in clinical practice. It additionally included a baseline measurement of sexual function and MDD severity on drug-naïve patients prior to the initiation of treatment. Finally, the follow-up of 12 weeks extends beyond the acute phase of treatment in which previous research has observed a peak in sexual side effects. In terms of limitations, there was no placebo arm; thus, the study cannot attribute the effects on sexual function to treatment with antidepressants per se. Also, the patients were young, which may have served as a protective factor against sexual side effects. CONCLUSION: Sexual dysfunction was strongly associated with MDD and improved in parallel with overall symptoms of depression across a standard 12-week treatment with SSRI antidepressants. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02869035 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02869035).

Differentiated timing of induction for women with intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy-A historical cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: Intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (ICP) is a pregnancy-specific liver disease characterized by pruritus and abnormal liver function tests and it has been associated with intrauterine fetal distress and stillbirth. We compared two guidelines of the management of ICP: one mandating induction at 38 weeks of gestation (Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital before 2012) and another separating ICP into mild and severe forms, and only women with severe ICP were recommended for induction at 38 weeks (Hvidovre Hospital after 2012). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed a historical cohort study at two Copenhagen Hospitals from 2004 to 2015. We included 62 937 women with singleton deliveries at Rigshospitalet and 71 015 at Hvidovre Hospital, of whom 971 women (1.5%) and 998 women (1.4%) were diagnosed with ICP at Rigshospitalet and Hvidovre Hospital, respectively. Data were retrieved from a local medical database. For the analysis of induction and comparison of obstetrical outcomes we only included pregnancies with an ICP diagnosis and excluded women with other medical conditions that could mandate induction. Main outcome measures were induction and cesarean section rates, asphyxia and stillbirth. RESULTS: We found no changes in the rate of spontaneous labor, cesarean section and induction over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .17) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .38). For women with intended vaginal delivery we found no change in the final mode of delivery over the years at Rigshospitalet (P = .28) and Hvidovre Hospital (P = .57). CONCLUSIONS: The two approaches to the management of mild ICP regarding the timing of induction are comparable. Women with mild ICP and their clinicians should be encouraged to engage in shared decision-making when discussing timing of induction.