Immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy in older patients (≥ 70 years) with metastatic melanoma: a multicentre study.

INTRODUCTION: The use of immunotherapy in older patients remains challenging due to very few data on the efficacy and safety of treatment in this group. AIM: To analyse the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors in older patients (≥ 70 years) with metastatic melanoma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In the Maria Sklodowska-Curie Institute - Oncology Centre, between 2011 and 2017, 318 non-resectable or metastatic melanoma patients were treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: anti-CTLA-4 or/and anti-PD-1. Eighty-two patients were ≥ 70 years (median age: 76 years; range: 70-90 years). Among this group 10% of patients had brain metastases, 24% of patients had BRAF mutant melanoma, and co-morbidities were present in 86% of patients (mainly hypertension, cardiovascular diseases and/or diabetes). RESULTS: Median PFS and OS were similar in patients < 70 years and ≥ 70 years. In the group of patients ≥ 70 years old, the 2-year OS rate (from the start of immunotherapy) was 27%, and in patients aged < 70 it was 28% (p = NS). Two-year progression-free survival was 13.7% in the group of patients ≥ 70 years old and in patients aged < 70 it was 13% (p = NS). Patients ≥ 70 years of age were significantly less likely to have a BRAF mutation (p = 0.020). The presence of co-morbidities was not associated with an increased risk of immunotherapy (p = 0.790). CONCLUSIONS: The survival and toxicity profile in the older patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors are similar to younger patients. Therefore, the age as a clinical factor should not exclude this population from the most effective therapy used nowadays in melanoma treatment.

Immune-Related Pancytopenia Induced by Anti-PD-1 Therapy - Interrupt or Continue Treatment - The Role of Immunohistochemical Examination.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (anti-CTLA-4) and anti-programmed death receptor-1/ligand-1 (anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1) caused a breakthrough in oncology and significantly improved therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients. ICIs generate a specific reaction in T cells, directed against antigens on cancer cells, leading to their damage and death. Through similar or the same antigens, activated lymphocytes may also have a cytotoxic effect on healthy cells, causing development of specific adverse effects - so-called immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We present the case report of a 56 year old patient with disseminated melanoma. During treatment with immunotherapy (anti PD-1), neutropenic fever and pancytopenia occurred. Trepanobiopsy of the bone marrow was performed to determine the cause of pancytopenia. Histopathological assessment of bone marrow combined with immunophenotype investigations may explain the cause of hematological disorders occurring in the course of treatment with ICIs, and support the choice of an appropriate treatment, directly translated into positive outcomes.

[Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the uterine cervix - case report]. / Pierwotny chloniak rozlany z duzych komórek B szyjki macicy - opis przypadku.

We present a case of a 54-year-old woman treated for stage IIAE primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) of the uterine cervix. The CHOP chemotherapy regimen was started. After the diagnosis of lymphoma of DLBCL CD20+ type was confirmed, rituximab was added to the therapy. Within systemic therapy, the patient received two cycles of CHOP and six cycles of R-CHOP altogether. After treatment completion, total remission of the lesions was observed on computed tomography. Twenty-four months after therapy completion, the patient is disease-free with no signs of recurrence.

Analysis of adverse events of sunitinib in patients treated for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Treatment of the metastatic stage of renal cell carcinoma is specific because classical chemotherapy is not applicable here. The treatment is mainly based on molecularly targeted drugs, including inhibitors of tyrosine kinases. In many cases the therapy takes many months, and patients often report to general practitioners due to adverse events. In this article, the effectiveness and side effects of one of these drugs are presented. The aim of the study was to analyse of the toxicity and safety of treatment with sunitinib malate in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma in the metastatic stage. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Adverse events were analyzed using retrospective analysis of data collected in a group of 39 patients treated in the Department of Systemic and Generalized Malignancies in the Cancer Center in Krakow, Poland. RESULTS: Toxicity of treatment affected 50% of patients. The most common side effects observed were hypertension, thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, diarrhea and weakness. Grade 3 serious adverse events according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4 affected up to 10% of patients. The most common serious adverse events were hypertension and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: Sunitinib malate is characterized by a particular type of toxicity. Knowledge of the types and range of adverse events of this drug is an important part of oncological and internal medicine care.

Effects of palliative treatment with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to assess the results of treatment with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas who no longer benefit from surgical treatment and radiotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The retrospective analysis included 51 patients treated between 2001 and 2007 in the Centre of Oncology in Kraków. Glioblastoma multiforme was histologically diagnosed in 24 (47%) patients; anaplastic astrocytomas and other grade III gliomas (according to WHO classification) were diagnosed in 27 (53%) patients. Patients received 1-11 cycles of treatment with temozolomide - 210 cycles were given in total. Forty-five patients were eligible for efficacy assessment because 6 patients received only one chemotherapy cycle (due to rapid progression of the glioma). RESULTS: According to the radiological assessment, 6 patients (13%) had an objective response and a further 16 patients (36%) had stabilization of the glioma. Subjective improvement was noted in 26 patients (58%), and neurological improvement was observed in 14 patients (31%). The median survival in the whole group was 41 weeks (40 weeks in patients with glioblastoma multiforme and 54 weeks in patients with anaplastic gliomas). One-year overall survival in the above-mentioned groups was 40.7%, 22%, and 50%, respectively. Two-year overall survival was 16%, 8%, and 20.9%, respectively. Adverse events were observed during 73 (35%) cycles of treatment and prompted a dose reduction in 12 (24.5%) patients. The most frequent adverse events were: thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, nausea and vomiting. Adverse events did not lead to treatment withdrawal in any patient. CONCLUSIONS: Objective benefit from the temozolomide treatment (stabilization or objective remission) was observed in 49% of patients irrespective of histological diagnosis. Tolerability of treatment with temozolomide in patients with high-grade gliomas is good.