The Missing Link: Defining the Functional Parameters of Pelvic and Acetabular Alignment.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to define the three-dimensional functional alignment of the pelvis, proximal femur, and acetabulum during postural and physical activities. METHODS: Thirty volunteers aged 40 years or greater were recruited. Reflective markers placed on bony prominences on the pelvis and lower extremities were tracked using a 12-camera motion analysis system. Measurements were obtained for various postures (ie, supine, standing, and sitting) and activities (ie, walking and ascending/descending stairs). RESULTS: Significant pelvic motion occurred only in the sagittal plane. The mean posterior inclinations of the pelvis were 15°, 18°, and 51° in the supine, standing, and sitting positions, respectively. These corresponded to acetabular anteversion/inclination angles of 26°/44°, 28°/45°, and 55°/55°, respectively. For activities, the mean posterior inclinations of the pelvis were 19°, 19°, and 20° during walking and ascending and descending stairs, respectively. These corresponded to acetabular anteversion/inclination angles of 29°/45°, 29°/45°, and 30°/46°, respectively. DISCUSSION: The functional parameters for pelvic and acetabular alignment were defined. Further research is needed to understand the extent to which these normal parameters are altered in the setting of hip and/or spinal degenerative disease to guide acetabular implant placement.

Effects of tourniquet use in paediatric lower leg surgery.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the use of the tourniquet and its effect on post-operative pain in the paediatric population following lower leg procedures. METHODS: A retrospective study of paediatric patients (under the age of 18) undergoing inpatient orthopaedic procedure below the knee performed at a single academic institution between 1st December 2013 and 31st January 2019 was conducted. Primary outcome measures of total opioid consumption during hospital stay and pre-operative nerve block utilization were retrieved from the electronic medical record (EMR). Secondary outcome measures of blood loss, tourniquet time, procedure time and length of hospital stay were also retrieved. Student's t-tests were used to assess statistical significance between two sample means. RESULTS: The final analysis included 204 paediatric procedures, 118 of which used a tourniquet and 86 of which did not. Paediatric patients with a tourniquet had significantly more opioid consumption post-operatively in the form of weight-based morphine equivalents/length of stay (p = 0.01) compared to those who had no tourniquet. This held true for males (p = 0.049) and females (p = 0.04) respectively. We did not see an increase in wound complications or return trips to the operating room in the tourniquet cohort. All procedures included an osseous component except one procedure in the non-tourniquet group. CONCLUSION: Minimizing opioid consumption may be achieved by avoiding tourniquet use in paediatric patients with lower leg procedures. In non-anaemic paediatric patients, it is reasonably risk-free to perform these surgeries without the use of tourniquet to decrease opioid dependence in the post-operative period. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Osteochondral Graft Size Is Significantly Associated With Increased Force and Decreased Chondrocyte Viability.

BACKGROUND: Insertion force has been shown to significantly reduce chondrocyte viability during osteochondral allograft transplantation. How graft size influences the required insertion force and chondrocyte viability has yet to be determined. Hypothesis/Purpose: The purpose was to characterize how graft size influences insertion force requirements and chondrocyte viability during osteochondral transplantation. The hypothesis was that larger grafts would require greater force and reduce chondrocyte viability. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Four graft sizes-15 × 5 mm, 15 × 10 mm, 25 × 5 mm, and 25 × 10 mm (diameter × depth)-were harvested from 13 thawed fresh-frozen human cadaveric distal femurs. Average, maximum, and cumulative force and number of impacts were recorded for 44 grafts by a surgical mallet embedded with a calibrated force sensor. In a separate experiment, fresh osteochondral tissues were subjected to mechanical loading. To capture a range of clinically important forces, categories were selected to correspond to impaction force data. Chondrocyte viability was assessed with confocal laser microscopy and live/dead staining. RESULTS: Total force for all grafts averaged 4576 N. Median number of impacts for all grafts was 20 (range, 7-116). The mean number of impacts for 5-mm-deep grafts was 14.2 (95% CI, 10.8-18.6), as compared with 26.3 (95% CI, 19.9-34.4) for 10-mm-deep grafts ( P < .001). The mean cumulative force for 5-mm-deep grafts was 2128 N (95% CI, 1467-3087), as opposed to 4689 N (95% CI, 3232-6803) for 10-mm-deep grafts ( P = .001). For every 1 mm in graft depth, an average of 13.1% (95% CI, 6.2%-20.3%) more impacts are required when controlling for diameter and density ( P < .001). For every 1 mm in graft depth, the force required increases on average by 17.1% (95% CI, 7.7%-27.4%) when controlling for diameter and density ( P = .001). There was a significant reduction in chondrocyte viability for the forces required for graft thickness values >10 mm. Only forces associated with graft thickness <10 mm had chondrocyte viabilities consistently >70%. CONCLUSION: Insertion force increases significantly with increasing graft depth. Controlling for diameter and bone density, a 1-mm increase in graft depth is associated with 13.1% more impacts and 17.1% more force. Chondrocyte viability was significantly reduced to <70% at average forces associated with grafts thicker than 10 mm. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Based on the current data, graft depth is an important consideration for surgeons when sizing osteochondral allograft transplant for chondral lesions of the knee.

Is Scheduled Intravenous Acetaminophen Effective in the Pain Management Protocol of Geriatric Hip Fractures?

BACKGROUND: Hip fractures have significant effects on the geriatric population and the health care system. Prior studies have demonstrated both the safety of intravenous (IV) acetaminophen and its efficacy in decreasing perioperative narcotic consumption. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of scheduled IV acetaminophen for perioperative pain control on length of hospital stay, pain level, narcotic use, rate of missed physical therapy (PT) sessions, adverse effects, and discharge disposition in geriatric patients with hip fractures. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients 65 years and older admitted to a level I trauma center, who received operative treatment for a hip fracture over a 2-year period. Demographic data, in-hospital variables, and outcome measures were analyzed. Three hundred thirty-six consecutive fractures in 332 patients met inclusion criteria. These patients were divided into 2 cohorts. Group 1 (169 fractures) consisted of patients treated before the initiation of a standardized IV acetaminophen perioperative pain control protocol, and group 2 (167 fractures) consisted of those treated after the protocol was initiated. RESULTS: Group 2 had a statistically significant shorter mean length of hospital stay (4.4 vs 3.8 days), lower mean pain score (4.2 vs 2.8), lower mean narcotic usage (41.3 vs 28.3 mg), lower rate of PT sessions missed (21.8% vs 10.4%), and higher likelihood of discharge home (7% vs 19%; P ≤ .001). Use of IV acetaminophen was also consistently and independently predictive of the same variables (P < .01). CONCLUSION: The utilization of scheduled IV acetaminophen as part of a standardized pain management protocol for geriatric hip fractures resulted in shortened length of hospital stay, decreased pain levels and narcotic use, fewer missed PT sessions, and higher rate of discharge to home. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III.

Cervical spine computed tomography imaging artifact affecting clinical decision-making in the traumatized patient.

CT scanning is an important tool in the evaluation of trauma patients. We review a case involving a trauma patient in which a cervical spine computed tomography (CT) artifact affected decision-making by physicians. The CT artifact mimicked bilateral dislocated facets (51-B1.1). On the basis of CT findings, the patient was transferred to a different hospital for evaluation. Discrepancy between the primary CT scan and patient physical exam prompted secondary CT scans and X-ray evaluation; neither of these studies showed osseous abnormalities. This case reinforces the necessity for physicians to formulate their diagnosis based upon multiple areas of information including physical examination, plain x-ray and subsequent advanced imaging, rather than relying solely on advanced imaging.

Factors used by program directors to select hand surgery fellows.

PURPOSE: To identify factors and attributes hand surgery fellowship program directors consider important in selecting applicants for interview and ranking. METHODS: A web-based questionnaire was sent to all hand fellowship program directors in the United States. The questionnaire was designed to identify the most important criteria in granting an interview, sources of letters of recommendation, the interview process, and factors used to rank a candidate. Each criterion was ranked in importance on a 1 to 5 Likert scale, with 1 being not important and 5 being critical. All responses were anonymous. The most important criterion for each section of the survey was determined by comparing the average Likert scores. RESULTS: Fifty-two of 76 program directors responded (68%). The criteria with the highest mean Likert scores for offering an applicant an interview were, in order, quality letters of recommendation from hand surgeons, completion of an orthopedic surgery residency, comments regarding the applicant's technical competence, applicant having an MD degree (as opposed to a DO degree), and residency program reputation. The letters of recommendation with the highest value were from the division chief of hand surgery and another hand surgeon in the division/department. The most important features of the interview were maturity of applicant, ability of applicant to articulate thoughts, ability to listen well, self-confidence, and relevant questions asked. The most important factors in ranking a candidate were applicant integrity, commitment to hard work, quality of letters of recommendation, quality of the interview, and ability to work well with other members of the hand surgery team. CONCLUSIONS: There are identifiable factors considered important by hand surgery fellowship directors when selecting and ranking an applicant. This information may be valuable to medical students and residents contemplating careers in hand surgery.