SARS-CoV-2 antigen tests for screening of healthcare workers; experience with over 48,000 combined antigen tests and RT-PCR tests.

BACKGROUND: To prevent spread to patients and co-workers, health care workers (HCWs) infected with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) should quickly be identified. Although real time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) is the gold standard, this test takes several hours, during which a HCW is unable to work. Antigen (Ag) tests may be an efficacious means of screening HCWs since they are easy to perform and provide fast results. METHODS: In this study, 48,010 paired results of Ag-testing and RT-PCR, performed on HCWs between January 2021 and April 2022, were evaluated to determine the diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 Ag-tests in diagnosing potentially infectious individuals. This analysis was performed with cycling threshold values (Ct-values) ≤30 and ≤25 as cut-offs. RESULTS: Respectively 3.1% (n = 1507) and 0.3% (n = 140) of Ag-tests were positive or indeterminate, and thus indicative for SARS-CoV-2 infection. In total, 2479 (5.2%) RT-PCRs were positive, of which 1529 (61.7%) had a Ct-value ≤25 and 402 (16.2%) a Ct-value between 26 and 30. At Ct-value ≤30 as a cut-off, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of Ag-tests were 79.0%, 99.8%, 93.8% and 99.1%, respectively. At Ct-value ≤25, sensitivity further improved to 92.0%, by which the NPV increased to 99.7%. CONCLUSIONS: To prevent transmission from HCWs to patients and co-workers, while maintaining workforce capacity, Ag-tests are a valuable addition to RT-PCR tests, as they have a quick turnaround time and excellent sensitivity for identifying individuals with high potential for transmission.

Validation and verification of the GeneFinder™ COVID-19 Plus RealAmp kit on the ELITe InGenius® instrument.

BACKGROUND: Throughout the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, a rapid identification of the virus was essential to quickly recognize positive cases and limit further spread by applying appropriate infection prevention. Many diagnostic laboratories use a multiplex Real-Time PCR assay, as they are not only highly sensitive but also specific. Currently, there are several assays and platforms in the market available which target different SARS-CoV-2 genes. The aim of this study was to validate and verify the GeneFinder™ COVID-19 PLUS RealAmp kit on the ELITe InGenius® instrument and compare to the national reference method. METHODS: GeneFinder™ COVID-19 PLUS RealAmp kit was evaluated against the routine WHO in- house Real-Time PCR assay, which is also the national reference method in the Netherlands and used in our laboratory. The sensitivity was tested using the analytical panel from Qnostics (Glasgow, United Kingdom) and the specificity was tested with patient material comprising of other seasonal respiratory viruses. In addition, 96 clinical samples initially analyzed by routine Real-Time PCR were tested using the GeneFinder™ COVID-19 PLUS RealAmp kit on the ELITe InGenius® instrument. RESULTS: The GeneFinder™ COVID-19 PLUS RealAmp kit had a similar performance compared to routine in-house testing, with a limit of detection of 500 dC/mL for the RdRp-gene and E gene. Meanwhile, the N gene showed a limit of detection of 50 dC/mL. The SARS-CoV-2 test was highly specific and detected no other respiratory viruses. The results of the clinical samples were comparable between both assays with similar Ct values observed for the in-house Real-Time-PCR and the GeneFinder™ COVID-19 PLUS RealAmp kit for the N gene. CONCLUSION: The GeneFinder™ COVID-19 PLUS RealAmp kit on the ELITe InGenius® instrument had an appropriate sensitivity and specificity that could be used in small scale laboratories or during night shifts where accurate diagnostics are crucial.

[Evaluation of the Two Different Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Methods Used for BK Virus (BKV) Quantification and BKV Genotype Assignment]. / BK Virüs (BKV) Kantitasyonunda Kullanilan Iki Farkli Gerçek Zamanli Polimeraz Zincir Reaksiyonu Yönteminin Karsilastirmasi ve BKV Genotip Tayini.

BK virus (BKV) viral load quantification has a distinct role in the clinical control of BKV nephropathy and organ rejection among renal transplant recipients. In this study, it was aimed to compare BKV DNA measurement values performed with two different real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods and to determine BKV genotypes in renal transplant recipients. Totally, 150 clinical samples tested previously in two different laboratories (Lab-1 and Lab-2) from adult and pediatric renal transplantation patients were included in the study. Fifty plasma samples of 50 different patients from Lab-1, 50 plasma and 50 urine samples of 58 different patients from Lab-2 were included in the study. Viral nucleic acid extraction was performed with automatized systems in Lab-1 and Lab-2 (EZ1, Qiagen, Germany and MagNA Pure 96, Roche Diagnostics, Germany; respectively;). Real-time PCR procedure was carried out in Lab-1 with an amplification mixture of primer, probe sequences targeting VP-1 gene region using RotorGene (Qiagen, Germany) and in Lab-2 with an amplification mixture of primer, probe sequences targeting VP-2 gene region using ABI Prism 7500 (Applied Biosystems, USA). BKV genotyping was performed with multiplex PCR using primer, probe sequences for BKV genotypes I-IV. In both of the laboratories, 82 (54.6%) of the samples were found as positive, 37(24.6%) samples were found as negative and a moderate agreement was found between qualitative results of two real-time PCR methods (ƙ= 0.56, p<0.001). Median viral load values were 4.1 x 104 copies/ml (321-6 x 109) in Lab-1 and 3.3 x 105 copies/ml (224-8.3 x 1010) in Lab-2 for positive samples. According to the lineer regression analysis of quantitative results, moderate (R2= 0.52, p<0.001) and high (R2= 0.88, p<0.001) correlation was found for plasma (n= 52) and urine (n= 30) samples, respectively. Bland-Altman analysis yielded a mean difference of -0.58 log10 for all samples. For plasma samples mean difference was -0.29 log10, while it was -1.1 log10 for urine samples. In all samples, Lab-1 measurements were lower than Lab-2 measurements. A mean difference of -1.1 log10 indicated that the measurement values of Lab-2 were more higher than Lab-1 measurments with an average of 1.1 log10. Supporting this result, 71.9% of the samples had a measurement difference more than 0.5 log 10 and 29.2% of the samples had a measurement difference more than 1 log10. Only 28.1% of the samples were measured within clinically acceptable log difference range (less than 0.5 log10). BKV genotyping was performed only for 74 different patient samples with sufficient copy numbers and genotype I (81.7%), IV (15.5%), II (1.4%), I+IV (1.4%) were detected. When the results were compared; 66.6% (n= 12) of the genotype IV samples had more than 1 log10 and 83.3% of them had more than 0.5 log10 viral load measurement difference. Correlation and linear regression analyzes were insufficient for the comparison ofthe results of the two different tests. It will be appropriate for each center to monitor patients with the same test until the international BKV standard developed by the World Health Organization is optimized. The clinical correlation of the tests is limited to the currently used test. The result of incorrect BKV quantification affects the clinical decision. Measurements less than the actual value will lead to the development of BKV nephropathy, and higher measurements will lead to unnecessary allograft biopsy and unnecessary reduction of immunosuppression.

Standardization of Nucleic Acid Tests: the Approach of the World Health Organization.

The first World Health Organization (WHO) international standards (ISs) for nucleic acid amplification techniques were established two decades ago, with the initial focus on blood screening for three major viral targets, i.e., hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, and human immunodeficiency virus 1. These reference materials have subsequently found utility in the diagnosis and monitoring of a wide range of infectious diseases in clinical microbiology laboratories worldwide. WHO collaborating centers develop ISs and coordinate international studies for their evaluation. The WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization is responsible for the endorsement of new standardization projects and the establishment of new and replacement ISs. Potencies of ISs are defined in international units (IU); the reporting in IU for assays calibrated with an IS (or secondary standards traceable to the IS) facilitates comparability of results for different assays and determination of assay parameters such as analytical sensitivities.

High human cytomegalovirus DNAemia early post-transplantation associates with irreversible and progressive loss of renal function - a retrospective study.

Transplant recipients are prone to viral infections, which could affect renal transplantation outcome. Our aim was to assess the effects of early human cytomegalovirus (CMV) DNAemia on transplant renal function. A total of 264 (age 50.9 ± 13.5; male 55%) renal transplantation recipients undergoing preemptive anti-CMV therapy were retrospectively categorized based on early (<3 months post-Tx) CMV peak viral load (PVL); PVL ≤ 536, PVL536-6310, or PVL > 6310 International Units/ml (IU/ml). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was analyzed between 1 and 36 months post-transplantation with Kruskal-Wallis test, linear regression, and a linear mixed-effects model. CMV infection was detectable in 113 (43%) recipients within 49 [38-67] days. Subjects with PVL > 6310 had statistically significant ~5-13 ml/min lower eGFR between 3 and 36 months compared to PVL ≤ 536 and PVL536-6310. eGFR declined from 46.1 to 40.7 ml/min/1.73 m2 (-12%) over 3 years, and the annual decrease for pronounced infection with high PVL was 2.0 ml/min/1.73 m2 faster than for noninfected or mildly infected subjects. In conclusion, high CMV DNAemia early after renal transplantation was associated with significant loss of renal function, from which subjects did not recover. The severity of infection (high PVL early post-transplantation), more than the infection per se, was related to irreversible and progressive loss of renal function.

The added value of hepatitis E diagnostics in determining causes of hepatitis in routine diagnostic settings in the Netherlands.

OBJECTIVES: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) genotype 3 is endemic in Europe and an underdiagnosed and emerging (public) health issue. In recent years commercial enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) that detect antibodies to HEV more adequately, became available. We investigated the added value of this HEV serology in the diagnostic work flow to detect viral causes of recent hepatitis. METHODS: During a 2-year period (May 2013 to May 2015), HEV serology was added to the hepatitis work flow, consisting of serological detection of hepatitis viruses A, B and C (HAV, HBV, HCV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) and cytomegalovirus (CMV). Samples positive for HEV IgM were also analysed using PCR to detect HEV RNA. If positive, HEV sequencing was performed for genotyping purposes. RESULTS: In 235 out of 2521 patients (9.3%), a viral cause for hepatitis was found. Recent HAV, HBV, HCV, EBV or CMV infections were serologically diagnosed in 3, 34, 10, 69 and 42 patients, respectively. Seventy-eight patients (3.1%) had a recent HEV infection. In 49 of them, sufficient HEV RNA was present for genotyping. All patients were infected with HEV genotype 3. CONCLUSIONS: In our region, an HEV infection is the most frequently diagnosed viral cause for recent hepatitis. These results indicate that, in a country where HEV is endemic, serological HEV diagnostics should be added to the standard work-up for viral hepatitis.

Human herpesvirus-6 DNAemia is a sign of impending primary CMV infection in CMV sero-discordant renal transplantations.

BACKGROUND: Human herpesvirus-6 (HHV-6) frequently reactivates in immunocompromized individuals. Most commonly HHV-6 DNA is detected without organ localized disease. This HHV-6 DNAemia usually occurs in patients who also have CMV reactivations. The question if reactivation of one virus causes reactivation of the other, or whether both viruses reactivate independently, cannot be answered in populations with high seroprevalence for both viruses. Our study is the first in which 35 patients have been included who were CMV seronegative prior to transplantation. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the occurrence of HHV-6 reactivations in relation to the CMV-serostatus of renal transplantation donor and recipient. STUDY DESIGN: 9 consecutive patients receiving a renal transplantation were included. All available stored whole blood samples were tested for HHV-6 DNA by quantitative PCR. Details including CMV serostatus of donor and recipient were recorded. RESULTS: CMV-seropositive recipients have a 68% chance of developing HHV-6 DNAemia if the kidney came from a CMV-seropositive donor, compared to 26% if the kidney came from a CMV-seronegative donor. CMV-seronegative recipients, who are bound to undergo primary CMV infections following transplantation with a renal graft from a CMV-seropositive donor, have 88% chance of developing HHV-6 DNAemia. If they receive a graft from a CMV-seronegative donor the chance of developing HHV-6 DNAemia is 22%. CONCLUSION: Receiving a renal transplant from a CMV-seropositive donor increases the chance of developing HHV-6 DNAemia. HHV-6 DNAemia is a sign of impending primary CMV infections following sero-discordant renal transplantations.

Rapid detection of a norovirus pseudo-outbreak by using real-time sequence based information.

BACKGROUND: Sequence based information is increasingly used to study the epidemiology of viruses, not only to provide insight in viral evolution, but also to understand transmission patterns during outbreaks. However, sequence analysis is not yet routinely performed by diagnostic laboratories, limiting its use in clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To describe the added value of sequence based information available within 3 days after the detection of norovirus in fecal samples of patients and personnel during a suspected outbreak on a hospital ward. Results were used to guide the implementation of appropriate infection control measures, in particular closure of the ward. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. RESULTS: Norovirus infection was detected in seven patients and two health care workers on an oncology ward of the children's hospital. Six of seven patients had a hospital acquired infection defined as a first day of illness more than two days after admission. After notification of the first two patients, supplementary infection control measures were taken to prevent further spread. Despite these measures, three additional patients with norovirus infection were identified. Characterization of the noroviruses of 5 out of 7 patients was available within 7 days after the notification of the first patient. Four different genotypes were detected, providing evidence for multiple introductions of different norovirus strains with only a few secondary cases rather than ongoing nosocomial transmission. Therefore, we maintained the already implemented infection control interventions without closure of the ward. CONCLUSIONS: Sequence based information available in real-time is helpful for understanding norovirus transmission in the hospital and facilitates appropriate infection control measures during an outbreak.

The significance of rhinovirus detection in hospitalized children: clinical, epidemiological and virological features.

Recent developments in molecular diagnostic tools have led to the easy and rapid detection of a large number of rhinovirus (HRV) strains. However, the lack of clinical and epidemiological data hampers the interpretation of these diagnostic findings. From October 2009 to January 2011, we conducted a prospective study in hospitalized children from whom samples were taken for the detection of respiratory viruses. Clinical, epidemiological and microbiological data from 644 patients with 904 disease episodes were collected. When HRV tested positive, strains were further characterized by sequencing the VP4/VP2 region of the HRV genome. HRV was the single respiratory virus detected in 254 disease episodes (28%). Overall, 99 different serotypes were detected (47% HRV-A, 12% HRV-B, 39% HRV-C). Patients with HRV had more underlying pulmonary illness compared with patients with no virus (p 0.01), or patients with another respiratory virus besides HRV (p 0.007). Furthermore, cough, shortness of breath and a need for oxygen were significantly more present in patients with HRV infection. Particularly, patients with HRV-B required extra oxygen. No respiratory symptom, except for oxygen need, was predictive of the presence of HRV. In 22% of HRV-positive disease episodes, HRV infection was hospital acquired. Phylogenetic analysis revealed several clusters of HRV; in more than 25% of these clusters epidemiological information was suggestive of transmission within specific wards. In conclusion, the detection of HRV may help in explaining respiratory illness, particular in patients with pulmonary co-morbidities. Identifying HRV provides opportunities for timely implementation of infection control measures to prevent intra-hospital transmission.

Laboratory-based surveillance in the molecular era: the TYPENED model, a joint data-sharing platform for clinical and public health laboratories.

Laboratory-based surveillance, one of the pillars of monitoring infectious disease trends, relies on data produced in clinical and/or public health laboratories. Currently, diagnostic laboratories worldwide submit strains or samples to a relatively small number of reference laboratories for characterisation and typing. However, with the introduction of molecular diagnostic methods and sequencing in most of the larger diagnostic and university hospital centres in high-income countries, the distinction between diagnostic and reference/public health laboratory functions has become less clear-cut. Given these developments, new ways of networking and data sharing are needed. Assuming that clinical and public health laboratories may be able to use the same data for their own purposes when sequence-based testing and typing are used, we explored ways to develop a collaborative approach and a jointly owned database (TYPENED) in the Netherlands. The rationale was that sequence data - whether produced to support clinical care or for surveillance -can be aggregated to meet both needs. Here we describe the development of the TYPENED approach and supporting infrastructure, and the implementation of a pilot laboratory network sharing enterovirus sequences and metadata.

Validation of a multiplex reverse transcriptase PCR ELISA for the detection of 19 respiratory tract pathogens.

INTRODUCTION: Since acute respiratory tract infections inflict a high burden of disease in children worldwide, a multiplex reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction combined with a microwell hybridization assay (m-RT-PCR-ELISA) to detect 19 different respiratory pathogens was developed and validated. METHODS: A total of 430 respiratory specimens were retrospectively tested in parallel by both the advanced 19-valent m-RT-PCR-ELISA as well as by culture or individual RT-PCR assays used in clinical routine. RESULTS: The mean (median) sensitivity of the m-RT-PCR-ELISA in the retrospective test was 93.3% (95.1%; range 83.3-100 %), and the mean (median) specificity was 99.8 and 100 % (range 98.6-100 %), respectively. The mean positive predictive value was 99.3 % (range 93.4-100 %) and the mean negative predictive value was 95.3 % (range 98.4-100 %). Feasibility and clinical value of the 19-valent method was prospectively shown on 16,231 incoming clinical specimens from patients between 0 and 16 years of age with acute respiratory tract infections admitted to pediatric hospitals or private practices from October 2003 to June 2010 in three regions in Germany (Kiel, Mainz, Freiburg; Freiburg to June 2007 only). At least one microorganism was detected in 10,765 of 16,231 (66.3 %) clinical specimens: 5,044 RV, 1,999 RSV, 1,286 AV, 944 EV, 737 seasonal IVA, 173 pandemic IVA H1N1-2009, 899 MPV, 518 CV, 383 PIV3, 268 PIV1, 259 Mpn, 205 IVB, 164 PIV2, 144 PIV4, 103 Bp, 29 Cpn and 29 Bpp, while reovirus and Lpn were not present in these specimens from a pediatric population. More than one organism could be detected in 13.4 % of the specimens. CONCLUSIONS: The m-RT-PCR-ELISA evaluated here improves the spectrum for diagnosing respiratory infections and is a feasible instrument for individual diagnostic and epidemiological studies.

Sequence-based identification and characterization of nosocomial influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 virus infections.

BACKGROUND: Highly transmissible viruses such as influenza are a potential source of nosocomial infections and thereby cause increased patient morbidity and mortality. AIM: To assess whether influenza virus sequence data can be used to link nosocomial influenza transmission between individuals. METHODS: Dutch A(H1N1)pdm09-positive specimens from one hospital (N = 107) were compared with samples from community cases (N = 685). Gene fragments of haemagglutinin, neuraminidase and PB2 were sequenced and subsequently clustered to detect patients infected with identical influenza viruses. The probability of detecting a second patient was calculated for each hospital cluster against the background diversity observed in hospital and community strains. All clusters were further analysed for possible links between patients. FINDINGS: Seventeen A(H1N1)pdm09 hospital clusters were detected of which eight had a low probability of occurrence compared with background diversity (P < 0.01). Epidemiological analysis confirmed a total of eight nosocomial infections in four of these eight clusters, and a mother-child combination in a fifth cluster. The nine clusters with a high probability of occurrence involved community cases of influenza without a known epidemiological link. CONCLUSION: If a background sequence dataset is available, the detection of hospital sequence clusters that differ from dominant community strains can be used to select clusters requiring further investigation by hospital hygienists before a nosocomial influenza outbreak is epidemiologically suspected.

Influenza in the immediate post-pandemic era: a comparison with seasonal and pandemic influenza in hospitalized patients.

BACKGROUND: Comparative data on severity and treatment of seasonal, pandemic and post-pandemic influenza virus infections are scarce. OBJECTIVES: To systematically analyze characteristics of hospitalized patients with influenza in the post-pandemic period compared to seasonal and pandemic influenza. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical and virological data of patients hospitalized in a tertiary referral hospital with post-pandemic influenza (2010-2011) were compared with those during seasonal influenza epidemics (2007-2009) and the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic (2009-2010). RESULTS: 82 patients were admitted during the post-pandemic period, compared to 85 during the pandemic and 60 during seasonal influenza epidemics. No differences were observed in the occurrence of complicated illness and the need for intensive care. However, radiographic pneumonia was significantly more often diagnosed in patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 compared to patients with seasonal influenza A (25% versus 71% in pandemic, p=0.004, and 55% in post-pandemic, p=0.047). Oseltamivir was more frequently prescribed in post-pandemic and pandemic patients compared to previous influenza seasons (48.9% resp. 76.5% versus 6.5%, p<0.0001). During the post-pandemic period, patients with influenza B were significantly less often treated with oseltamivir compared to patients with influenza A (27.0% versus 48.9%, p=0.043), although the course of illness in patients with influenza B was comparable with influenza A. No upsurge of oseltamivir resistance was observed. CONCLUSIONS: In our center, severity of illness was comparable for all influenza seasons, although more radiographic pneumonia was diagnosed in patients with influenza A(H1N1)pdm09. Despite the increased use of oseltamivir, no increase in oseltamivir resistance was detected.

Evaluation of the antiviral response to zanamivir administered intravenously for treatment of critically ill patients with pandemic influenza A (H1N1) infection.

A retrospective nationwide study on the use of intravenous (IV) zanamivir in patients receiving intensive care who were pretreated with oseltamivir in the Netherlands was performed. In 6 of 13 patients with a sustained reduction of the viral load, the median time to start IV zanamivir was 9 days (range, 4-11 days) compared with 14 days (range, 6-21 days) in 7 patients without viral load reduction (P = .052). Viral load response did not influence mortality. We conclude that IV zanamivir as late add-on therapy has limited effectiveness. The effect of an immediate start with IV zanamivir monotherapy or in combination with other drugs need to be evaluated.

Validation of the INNO-LiPA HBV DR assay (version 2) in monitoring hepatitis B virus-infected patients receiving nucleoside analog treatment.

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) antiviral drug resistance mutations prevent successful outcome of treatment and lead to worsening of liver disease. Detection of its emergence permits opportune treatment with alternative drugs. Unfortunately, the use of newly approved antivirals, including adefovir dipivoxil, emtricitabine, and telbivudine, is also associated with the development of drug resistance, albeit to a lesser extent than the use of lamivudine. The objectives of this work were to assess the performance characteristics (sensitivity and accuracy) of an updated drug resistance test, the INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2, which includes detection of mutations associated with lamivudine, adefovir, emtricitabine, and telbivudine resistance, and to compare the results with consensus sequencing of serum samples from patients treated with HBV antivirals. Diagnostic sensitivity, defined as detection of a positive amplification line on the line probe assay (LiPA) strip, was 94.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 89.7 to 97.9) after initial testing, increasing to 96.3% (95% CI, 91.6 to 98.8) after repeat test 1 and to 100% (95% CI, 97.3 to 100.0) after repeat test 2. In diagnostic accuracy determinations, full concordance was observed between sequencing and LiPA for 77.0% of the codons tested (620/805 codons [95% CI, 74.0 to 79.9]), whereas LiPA and sequencing were partially concordant 22% of the time (177/805 codons). In 167 out of 177 cases, LiPA detected a wild-type/mutant mixture whereas sequencing detected only one of the two results. Performance testing of the new LiPA test, the INNO-LiPA HBV DR v2, showed convincing diagnostic sensitivity and accuracy. The ability of the test to detect mixed infections and minority viral populations associated with resistance to the current generation of antivirals, including adefovir, emtricitabine, and telbivudine, makes it a useful tool for HBV therapy monitoring.

The impact of laboratory characteristics on molecular detection of respiratory syncytial virus in a European multicentre quality control study.

The performance of nucleic acid amplification techniques for detecting respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) was evaluated in 25 laboratories across Europe by an external quality assessment study. In addition, factors related to the diagnostic performance of laboratories were explored. The results of this quality control study show that the performance of laboratories for RSV diagnosis in Europe is good, with an overall correct score of 88%. The type of assay (nested or real-time PCR vs. commercial tests) was identified as a significant factor (OR 8.39; 95% CI 1.91-36.78) in predicting a correct result.

[Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection: usefulness of the combination of HBeAg and ALT determination to predict a high HBV-DNA level and therefore the necessity of referral to a specialist for possible antiviral treatment]. / Chronische hepatitis B-virus(HBV)-infectie: bruikbaarheid van de combinatie van HBeAg- en ALAT-bepaling als voorspeller van een hoog HBV-DNA-niveau en voor verwijzing naar de 2e lijn voor eventuele antivirale behandeling.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the usefulness of a simple practical guideline based on hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) status and a single alanine aminotransferase (ALT) determination to predict hepatitis B virus (HBV) load in chronic HBV patients as a criterion for referral to a specialist for possible antiviral therapy. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. METHOD: 420 patients with chronic HBV infection were seen at the Municipal Health Service (MHS) in Rotterdam between 2002 and 2005. The usefulness ofa guideline based on HBeAg positivity and/or elevated ALT levels to predict high HBV DNA levels (defined as more than 10(5) copies/ml) was determined. Patients with HBeAg or an elevated ALT level were referred to a specialist according to the practical guideline. Positive and negative predictive value, sensitivity, and specificity of the referral guideline for a high HBV-DNA level were calculated. RESULTS: Less than half, 43% (181/420) of the patients, were eligible for referral to specialist care. The positive predictive value of the referral guideline was 45% (82/181, 95% CI: 38-53). The negative predictive value, i.e. the proportion of patients with low viral loads who were (rightly) not selected for referral, was 95% (227/239; 95% CI: 71-97). The sensitivity was 87% (95% CI: 80-93): the patients selected included 82 of 94 patients with a high HBV DNA level. Of the 12 patients with high viral loads not referred according to the guideline, 11 had a viral load of between 10(5)-10(6) copies/ml. CONCLUSION: A referral guideline based on HBeAg status and a single ALT determination can successfully predict viral load in chronic HBV patients and can be used in primary care to select patients for referral to specialist care. This guideline may limit the number of unnecessarily referred patients, enhancing the efficiency of the care for patients with chronic HBV infection.

Role of respiratory pathogens in infants hospitalized for a first episode of wheezing and their impact on recurrences.

In order to evaluate the infectious agents associated with the first episode of severe acute wheezing in otherwise healthy infants and to define the role of each of them in recurrences, 85 patients in Italy, aged <12 months, hospitalized because of a first acute episode of wheezing, were prospectively enrolled between 1 October 2005 and 31 March 2006. Upon enrollment, nasopharyngeal swabs were collected for the real-time PCR detection of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) types A and B, influenza virus types A and B, adenovirus, parainfluenza viruses types 1, 2, 3 and 4, rhinovirus, human metapneumovirus, human coronavirus types 229E, OC43, NL63, and HKU1, bocavirus, enterovirus, and paraechovirus; nasopharyngeal aspirates were also obtained to detect atypical bacteria. At least one infectious agent was identified in 76 children (89.4%). RSV was the most frequently detected pathogen and its prevalence was significantly higher than that of the other pathogens in both age groups, and significantly higher in the children aged 3-12 months than in those aged <3 months. Only the children with RSV infection experienced recurrent wheezing. Viral load was significantly higher in children with than in those without recurrent wheezing. This study shows that RSV is the main reason for hospitalization during the first wheezing episode in infants, and that it appears to be the only pathogen associated with a high frequency of recurrences. A high viral load seems to be strictly related to the likelihood of recurrence.