Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Publication year range
1.
Rev. colomb. med. fis. rehabil. (En línea) ; 31(2): 174-191, 2021. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, COLNAL | ID: biblio-1452318

ABSTRACT

Introducción. Existe una gran heterogeneidad en los estudios que abordan la efectividad e indicación del tratamiento con ondas de choque (OCH) en la fascitis plantar (FP) respecto a otros tratamientos alternativos. Objetivos. Evaluar la efectividad del tratamiento con OCH en pacientes con FP mediante las evidencias científicas más actuales y evaluar la eficacia de este tratamiento en comparación con otros tipos de terapias también empleadas en el manejo de esta inflamación. Materiales y métodos. Se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica en las bases de datos PubMed y PEDro con los términos clave "shock wave" y "plantar fasciitis AND shock wave". Se selecciona- ron artículos publicados en español e inglés entre los años 2015 y 2019. Resultados. Tras aplicar los criterios de inclusión y exclusión y luego de eliminar los duplica- dos, se seleccionaron 13 estudios que englobaban una muestra total de 1.220 individuos y comparaban las OCH frente a placebo, OCH con ejercicios, ultrasonoterapia, laserterapia de bajo nivel e infiltración de corticoides y toxina botulínica. Conclusión. Las OCH constituyen un método eficaz y seguro para tratar la FP, siendo más efectivo que la ultrasonoterapia y la infiltración de toxina botulínica, aunque existe controversia en el resto de comparaciones. Su uso se aconseja asociado a un programa de ejercicios; sin embargo, es necesario realizar más estudios sobre esta técnica.


Introduction. There is great heterogeneity in the studies that address the effectiveness and indication of shock wave therapy (SWT) in plantar fasciitis (PF) with respect to other alternative treatments. Objectives. To evaluate the effectiveness of OCH treatment in patients with PF using the most current scientific evidence and to assess the efficacy of this treatment in comparison with other types of therapies also used in the management of this inflammation. Materials and methods. A literature search was performed in the PubMed and PEDro databases with the key terms "shock wave" and "plantar fasciitis AND shock wave". Articles published in Spanish and English between 2015 and 2019 were selected. Results. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and after eliminating duplicates, 13 studies were selected that encompassed a total sample of 1,220 individuals and compared OCH versus placebo, OCH with exercises, ultrasound therapy, low-level laser therapy, and corticosteroid and botulinum toxin infiltration. Conclusion. OCH is an effective and safe method to treat PF, being more effective than ultrasound therapy and botulinum toxin infiltration, although there is controversy in the rest of the comparisons. Its use is recommended in association with an exercise program; however, further studies on this technique are needed.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent
2.
Am J Mens Health ; 10(6): NP127-NP135, 2016 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26130728

ABSTRACT

The aim of the current study was to determine the demographic characteristics and risk factors associated with male urinary incontinence (UI) and to assess the effectiveness and the effect on the quality-of-life of a pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) protocol with electromyography-biofeedback (EMG-BFB) with surface electrodes. A prospective, quasi-experimental before-and-after study with a sample of 61 men out of 372 patients referred to the Pelvic Floor Unit from October 2005 to June 2012 was performed. The protocol consisted of 20 sessions of EMG-BFB supervised by a physiotherapist twice a week. The session durations were 30 minutes (118 work/rest cycles of pelvic muscles). Work lasted 3 seconds and rest 7 seconds. Patients were given standards of conduct and questionnaires (International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form and Incontinence Quality-of-Life Measure) at the beginning and at the end of the treatment. The average age was 64.85 ± 14.34 years; 44.3% (n = 27) had benign prostatic hypertrophy, 41.9% (n = 25) had prostate malignant neoplasm, 86.9% (n = 53) had undergone prostatectomy, 16.4% (n = 10) had undergone abdominal surgery. Abdominal surgery and radical prostatectomy were significantly associated with UI (p < .05). Stress urinary incontinence was the most common type of UI (86.67%), followed by mixed urinary incontinence (8.33%) and urge urinary incontinence (5%). A significant improvement (p < .05) in both International Consultation on Incontinence-Short Form and Incontinence Quality-of-Life Measure questionnaires was observed when making comparisons regarding the results before and after the EMG-BFB treatment protocol. These results support that male UI is significantly associated with urological and abdominal surgery (including radical prostatectomy) and that EMG-BFB for PFMT improves incontinence and quality of life (social embarrassment, limiting behavior, and psychosocial impact) in the three types of UI on an overall basis.


Subject(s)
Biofeedback, Psychology/methods , Electromyography/methods , Men's Health , Quality of Life/psychology , Urinary Incontinence/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pelvic Floor , Treatment Outcome , Urinary Incontinence/psychology , Urodynamics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...