Cost-per-Response Analysis of Pure Hypochlorous Acid Among Patients with Chronic Venous Leg Ulcers: A Health Economic Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the total cost-per-wound healing response (CPR) and the per-day CPR of patients with chronic leg ulcers treated with pure hypochlorous acid (pHA) as part of their overall would healing regimen. METHODS: The authors developed a deterministic decision-tree model to estimate the incremental CPR for pHA. The analysis was performed using clinical data from a published single-arm prospective study. The outcome of interest was re-epithelialization at 90 days. Economic data for pHA were based on public prices of pHA per dressing change from the wound care center perspective. The following time points were assessed: 90, 60, and 30 days. Dressing changes occurred every 2.5 days. Sensitivity analysis was performed to gauge the robustness of the results. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients (68% women) with 31 lesions (average age of wound, 29 months; range, 1-240 months) were included in the clinical study. Re-epithelialization occurred in 23 lesions (74%) at 90 days, 17 (55%) at 60 days, and 3 (10%) at 30 days. The total CPRs were $75.69, $68.27, and $193.44, and the per-day CPRs were $0.84, $1.13, and $6.45 at 90, 60, and 30 days, respectively. The sensitivity analysis revealed that CPRs ranged from $0.63 to $1.12 per day at 90 days. CONCLUSIONS: Incorporating pHA into standard wound healing protocols is a minimal added expense and may yield a substantial economic savings of $2,695 at 90 days.

In Vitro Characterization of Pressure Redistribution Among Commercially Available Wound Dressings.

OBJECTIVE: Recent clinical evidence has suggested that certain wound dressings may play a significant role in protocols to prevent or reduce pressure injury (PI) in patients at risk by modifying the pressure, friction, and shear forces that can contribute to PI. The aim of this study was to investigate the pressure reduction properties of commercially available wound dressings in vitro. METHODS: Using a standardized protocol (1.7 kg, 7.5-cm sphere), testing was performed in a controlled environment by the same clinician using a pressure mapping device (XSENSOR LX205; XSENSOR Technology Corporation, Calgary, Alberta, Canada) to measure and compare the pressure mitigation properties in a variety of wound dressings. RESULTS: A total of 13 different commercially available dressings were tested in triplicate for changes in pressure redistribution as compared with the control. One dressing demonstrated the greatest reduction of pressure forces (OxyBand PR; 50.33 ± 1.45 mm Hg) compared with the control (302.7 ± 0.33 mm Hg) and the greatest surface area of all the study dressings tested. There was a negative correlation (R2 = 0.73) between the average pressure distribution of a wound dressing and its contact area. Further, the peak pressure for OxyBand PR (P ≤ .05) was significantly different from all other tested dressings. CONCLUSIONS: One dressing (OxyBand PR) provided superior pressure redistribution and significantly reduced peak pressure in this study when compared with currently available standard foam and silicone dressings that are marketed for the purpose of PI prevention.