ABSTRACT
The relationship between pharmaceutical and biomedical technology companies (industry) and medical practitioners has been a topic of discussion and concern for several decades. The large monetary payments and extravagant gifts to physicians from these companies have been regulated and largely stopped; however, there still exists an active rapport between physicians and industry. Little formal instruction is given to medical students and residents on what constitutes a conflict of interest when entering these business partnerships. In this study, we presented a set of scenarios depicting industry-physician interactions to medical students, orthopaedic surgery residents, and attending physicians and asked them to decide whether a conflict of interest is depicted. Our goal was to determine whether a disparity exists in the ability to identify conflicts of interest across the levels of training. Of 200 potential participants, 70 provided responses to the survey (35%). Thirty-five (50%) were attending physicians, 18 (25.7%) residents, 12 (17.1%) medical students, and 8 (11.4%) declined to provide level of training. There was no significant difference in the ability to identify a conflict of interest across seniority level for the 13 questions. Our results suggest that both medical students and resident physicians are able to identify which interactions with industry pose a possible conflict of interest as accurately as attending physicians can.
