Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
Emerg Med Australas ; 32(1): 127-134, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31867879

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This prospective, observational, interventional study sought to determine if the introduction of resuscitative balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) at an Australian adult major trauma centre would improve survival for major trauma patients. METHODS: Patients aged 18-60 years, transported directly from scene with exsanguinating, sub-diaphragmatic haemorrhage and hypovolaemic shock (systolic BP <70 mmHg or hypovolaemic cardiac arrest) were eligible for recruitment and followed up until hospital discharge (ACTRN12618000550202). RESULTS: During the 14-month study period (17 January 2015 to 12 March 2016) 3032 patients were admitted direct from scene with an overall mortality of 97 (3.71%). Of these patients 3019 had trauma centre vital signs recorded in the data set (99.57%) and 1523 were between the ages of 18-60, including 143 patients with a shock index of >1.0 (4.74%). There were 13 (0.43%) patients with a systolic BP <70 mmHg and/or cardiorespiratory arrest on arrival. The mortality in this group was six out of 13 (46.15%). Of these 13 patients, there were two (0.07% of the total cohort) where REBOA was attempted. There were no eligible patients for whom REBOA was achieved. None of the six patients who died would have benefited from REBOA deployment. CONCLUSIONS: Despite considerable training and resource allocation to ensure 24-h availability, the introduction of REBOA failed to effectively demonstrate any impact on patient outcome. Despite retrospective literature supporting the introduction of REBOA, in this 14-month prospective study there was no evidence of benefit. Further studies may define indications and subgroups of patients who may benefit.


Subject(s)
Aorta/injuries , Balloon Occlusion , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Resuscitation/methods , Shock/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Algorithms , Feasibility Studies , Female , Hemorrhage/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Prospective Studies , Shock/mortality , Survival Rate , Trauma Centers , Victoria
2.
Injury ; 50(1): 119-124, 2019 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30442372

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Multiple rib fractures have been shown to reduce quality of life both in the short and long term. Treatment of rib fractures with operative fixation reduces ventilator requirements, intensive care unit stay, and pulmonary complications in flail chest patients but has not been shown to improve quality of life in comparative studies to date. We therefore wanted to analyse a large cohort of multiple fractured rib trauma patients to see if rib fixation improved their quality of life. METHODS: Retrospective review (January 2012 - April 2015) of prospectively collected data on 1482 consecutive major trauma patients admitted to The Alfred Hospital with rib fractures. The main outcome measures were Quality of Life over 24 months post injury assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended (GOSErate) and Short Form (SF12) health assessment forms and a pain questionnaire. RESULTS: 67 (4.5%) patients underwent rib fixation and were older, with a higher incidence of flail chest injury, and higher AIS and ISS scores than the remainder of the cohort. Rib fixation provided no benefit in pain, SF-12 or GOSErate scores over 24 months post injury. CONCLUSIONS: This study has not been able to demonstrate any quality of life benefit of rib fixation over 24 months post injury in patients with major trauma.


Subject(s)
Flail Chest/psychology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Pain/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Rib Fractures/psychology , Thoracic Injuries/psychology , Adult , Aged , Analgesia/statistics & numerical data , Australia , Female , Flail Chest/physiopathology , Flail Chest/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal , Fracture Healing/physiology , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , Rib Fractures/complications , Rib Fractures/physiopathology , Rib Fractures/surgery , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Thoracic Injuries/physiopathology , Thoracic Injuries/surgery , Time Factors , Young Adult
3.
Emerg Med Australas ; 30(3): 359-365, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29268305

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Cervical spine traumatic epidural haematomas (CSTEH) can cause potentially devastating neurological deficits if not promptly identified. Study aims were to determine the incidence, characteristics and outcomes for patients with CSTEH. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at a tertiary hospital with an adult Level 1 Trauma Centre on all consecutive patients diagnosed with CSTEH over a 4 year period. Medical record review was undertaken for all patients with the diagnoses of CSTEH to identify patient characteristics including age, mechanism of injury and co-morbid conditions. Additional data was extracted regarding radiology interpretation, surgical interventions, thromboembolic chemoprophylaxis use, discharge disposition and neurological outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 27 888 patients were admitted with traumatic injuries between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2014, of which 1916 patients sustained cervical spine injuries. The incidence of CSTEH was 0.6% among all trauma patients and 9.1% among patients with any cervical spine injury. Of those with CSTEH, 89 patients (50.9%) had neurological deficits consistent with the anatomical location of the epidural haematoma. Magnetic resonance imaging diagnosed CSTEH in 132 patients (75.4%), of whom 23 patients (13.1%) had normal computed tomography cervical spine imaging. Among the patients diagnosed with CSTEH, 13 (7.4%) died and 78 (44.6%) required cervical spine surgical decompressions. CONCLUSION: This study shows a high incidence of CSTEH among trauma patients. CSTEH is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. High clinical vigilance is required to allow the request and acquisition of urgent magnetic resonance imaging to diagnose CSTEH as the entity is often not evident on initial cervical spine computed tomography investigations.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal/physiopathology , Incidence , Adult , Aged , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Female , Hematoma, Epidural, Spinal/epidemiology , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Victoria/epidemiology
4.
Injury ; 45(1): 71-6, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23859653

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: An audit of ambulance service clinical records from 2001 to 2002 in Melbourne, Australia revealed 10 patients with tension pneumothorax on arrival at hospital which had been undetected or untreated by paramedics. The clinical practice guideline for paramedic recognition of tension pneumothorax was subsequently changed to emphasise heightened clinical suspicion of a tension pneumothorax in the setting of chest trauma, especially when patients were managed with positive pressure ventilation. This study was undertaken to determine whether the number of undetected or untreated tension pneumothoraces had decreased after the new clinical practice guideline and associated education program; if there were unintended consequences arising from earlier paramedic intervention; and what effect, if any, this change had on subsequent hospital treatment. METHODS: Retrospective case note review of all patients requiring intercostal catheter (ICC) insertion at The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Australia, using records from Ambulance Victoria, the Alfred Trauma Registry and the National Coronial Information System. RESULTS: In 2001-2002 paramedics treated 22 patients with suspected tension pneumothorax before transport to the Alfred Hospital. In 2006-2007 this number had increased to 81. There was a decrease from ten to four in the number of unrecognised or untreated tension pneumothoraces between the two time periods. No unintended or adverse consequences of prehospital needle decompression could be found. However, there was an increase in the number of patients who had prehospital needle decompression that needed further treatment for tension pneumothorax on arrival at hospital. This need for further treatment was associated with use of shorter cannulas and unilateral needle decompression by paramedics. CONCLUSION: A small change in clinical practice guidelines, supported by an education and audit program, led to a reduction in unrecognised untreated tension pneumothoraces by paramedics without an increase in complications. Paramedics should be aware that a shorter cannula may fail to reach the pleural space and that both sides of the chest may require decompression.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel/education , Emergency Medical Services , Pneumothorax/diagnosis , Thoracic Injuries/diagnosis , Thoracostomy/methods , Ambulances , Australia/epidemiology , Catheters/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Competence , Decompression, Surgical , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Medical Services/standards , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Needles/statistics & numerical data , Pneumothorax/etiology , Pneumothorax/therapy , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Ribs , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Thoracostomy/adverse effects , Victoria/epidemiology
5.
Injury ; 44(12): 1838-42, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23680282

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of research into the outcomes and complications of cervical spine immobilisation (hard collar or halothoracic brace) in older people. AIMS: To identify morbidity and mortality outcomes using geriatric medicine assessment techniques following cervical immobilisation in older people with isolated cervical spine fractures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified participants using an injury database. We completed a questionnaire measuring pre-admission medical co-morbidities and functional independence. We recorded the surgical plan and all complications. A further questionnaire was completed three months later recording complications and functional independence. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were recruited over a three month period. Eight were immobilised with halothoracic brace, 8 with external hard collar. Three deaths occurred during the study. Lower respiratory tract infection was the most common complication (7/16) followed by delirium (6/16). Most patients were unable to return home following the acute admission, requiring sub-acute care on discharge. The majority of patients were from home prior to a fall, 6/16 were residing there at 3 months. Most participants had an increase in their care needs at 3 months. There was no difference in the type or incidence of complications between the different modes of immobilisation. CONCLUSIONS: Geriatric medicine assessment techniques identified the morbidity and functional impairment associated with cervical spine immobilisation. This often results in a prolonged length of stay in supported care. This small pilot study recommends a larger study over a longer period using geriatric medicine assessment techniques to better define the issues.


Subject(s)
Cervical Vertebrae/injuries , Delirium/epidemiology , Immobilization , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Orthotic Devices , Quality of Life/psychology , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/rehabilitation , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Australia , Comorbidity , External Fixators , Female , Geriatric Assessment , Geriatrics , Humans , Immobilization/adverse effects , Incidence , Male , Patient Discharge , Pilot Projects , Prognosis , Spinal Fractures/epidemiology , Spinal Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
6.
Int Emerg Nurs ; 21(2): 129-35, 2013 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23615521

ABSTRACT

A project based at the Alfred Emergency and Trauma Centre in Melbourne, Australia aimed to standardise trauma resuscitation, documentation and interventions by developing best practice algorithms. The primary study objective was to demonstrate a reduction in management errors using a real-time computer based algorithm (the study group) compared to the control group in an open randomised controlled interventional study. A baseline control group was also used for comparison with usual (current) practice. In order to examine the existing evidence and algorithms in trauma care, nine teams of emergency nurses and doctors were formed. Specific literature searches performed by each team revealed a paucity of evidence supporting clinical practice in the trauma setting for procedures. Subsequently, the multidisciplinary teams worked together and developed algorithms based on best practice. The process revealed three main areas of challenges in the development of algorithms: (i) clinical, (ii) research and (iii) nursing challenges. The completion of the project demonstrated benefits in the real-time computer based algorithm with a reduction in the error rate per patient from the baseline control group to the intervention study group (2.30 vs. 2.13, p=0.04) and error-free resuscitations increasing from 16% to 21.8% (p=.049). This project supported the implementation of a real-time computer based algorithm system with improved protocol compliance and reduced errors and morbidity.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Emergency Nursing , Evidence-Based Nursing , Resuscitation/nursing , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Humans , Victoria
8.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 19: 29, 2011 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21548991

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many trauma registries have used the Abbreviated Injury Scale 1990 Revision Update 98 (AIS98) to classify injuries. In the current AIS version (Abbreviated Injury Scale 2005 Update 2008 - AIS08), injury classification and specificity differ substantially from AIS98, and the mapping tools provided in the AIS08 dictionary are incomplete. As a result, data from different AIS versions cannot currently be compared. The aim of this study was to develop an additional AIS98 to AIS08 mapping tool to complement the current AIS dictionary map, and then to evaluate the completed map (produced by combining these two maps) using double-coded data. The value of additional information provided by free text descriptions accompanying assigned codes was also assessed. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, a panel of expert AIS coders established plausible AIS08 equivalents for the 153 AIS98 codes which currently have no AIS08 map. A series of major trauma patients whose injuries had been double-coded in AIS98 and AIS08 was used to assess the maps; both of the AIS datasets had already been mapped to another AIS version using the AIS dictionary maps. Following application of the completed (enhanced) map with or without free text evaluation, up to six AIS codes were available for each injury. Datasets were assessed for agreement in injury severity measures, and the relative performances of the maps in accurately describing the trauma population were evaluated. RESULTS: The double-coded injuries sustained by 109 patients were used to assess the maps. For data conversion from AIS98, both the enhanced map and the enhanced map with free text description resulted in higher levels of accuracy and agreement with directly coded AIS08 data than the currently available dictionary map. Paired comparisons demonstrated significant differences between direct coding and the dictionary maps, but not with either of the enhanced maps. CONCLUSIONS: The newly-developed AIS98 to AIS08 complementary map enabled transformation of the trauma population description given by AIS98 into an AIS08 estimate which was statistically indistinguishable from directly coded AIS08 data. It is recommended that the enhanced map should be adopted for dataset conversion, using free text descriptions if available.


Subject(s)
Abbreviated Injury Scale , Injury Severity Score , Population Surveillance/methods , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Victoria/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Young Adult
9.
Injury ; 41(9): 948-54, 2010 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20074729

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The 2005 version of the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS05) potentially represents a significant change in injury spectrum classification, due to a substantial increase in the codeset size and alterations to the agreed severity of many injuries compared to the previous version (AIS98). Whilst many trauma registries around the world are moving to adopt AIS05 or its 2008 update (AIS08), its effect on patient classification in existing registries, and the optimum method of comparing existing data collections with new AIS05 collections are unknown. The present study aimed to assess the potential impact of adopting the AIS05 codeset in an established trauma system, and to identify issues associated with this change. METHODS: A current subset of consecutive major trauma patients admitted to two large hospitals in the Australian state of Victoria were double-coded in AIS98 and AIS05. Assigned codesets were also mapped to the other AIS version using code lists supplied in the AIS05 manual, giving up to four AIS codes per injury sustained. Resulting codesets were assessed for agreement in codes used, injury severity and calculated severity scores. RESULTS: 602 injuries sustained by 109 patients were compared. Adopting AIS05 would lead to a decrease in the number of designated major trauma patients in Victoria, estimated at 22% (95% confidence interval, 15-31%). Differences in AIS level between versions were significantly more likely to occur amongst head and chest injuries. Data mapped to a different codeset performed better in paired comparisons than raw AIS98 and AIS05 codesets, with data mapping of AIS05 codes back to AIS98 giving significantly higher levels of agreement in AIS level, ISS and NISS than other potential comparisons, and resulting in significantly fewer conversion problems than attempting to map AIS98 codes to AIS05. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides new insights into AIS codeset change impact. Adoption of AIS05 or AIS08 in established registries will decrease major trauma patient numbers. Code mapping between AIS versions can improve comparisons between datasets in different AIS versions, although the injury profile of a trauma population will affect the degree of comparability. At present, mapping AIS05 data back to AIS98 is recommended.


Subject(s)
Abbreviated Injury Scale , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Australia/epidemiology , Clinical Coding , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Registries , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology
10.
Med J Aust ; 191(1): 11-6, 2009 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19580529

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine the response of the Victorian State Trauma System to the February 2009 bushfires. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of the strategic response required to treat patients with bushfire-related injury in the first 72 hours of the Victorian bushfires that began on 7 February 2009. Emergency department (ED) presentations and initial management of patients presenting to the state's adult burns centre (The Alfred Hospital [The Alfred]) were analysed, as well as injuries and deaths associated with the fires. RESULTS: There were 414 patients who presented to hospital EDs as a result of the bushfires. Patients were triaged at the emergency scene, at treatment centres and in hospital. National and statewide burns disaster plans were activated. Twenty-two patients with burns presented to the state's burns referral centres, of whom 18 were adults. Adult burns patients at The Alfred spent 48.7 hours in theatre in the first 72 hours. There were a further 390 bushfire-related ED presentations across the state in the first 72 hours. Most patients with serious burns were triaged to and managed at burns referral centres. Throughout the disaster, burns referral centres continued to have substantial surge capacity. CONCLUSIONS: Most bushfire victims either died, or survived with minor injuries. As a result of good prehospital triage and planning, the small number of patients with serious burns did not overload the acute health care system.


Subject(s)
Burns/epidemiology , Burns/therapy , Disaster Planning/organization & administration , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Fires , Triage/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Burn Units/organization & administration , Burns/mortality , Child , Humans , Middle Aged , National Health Programs/organization & administration , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Victoria/epidemiology , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
11.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 35(5): 482, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26815216

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The incidence of blunt bowel and mesenteric injury (BBMI) has increased recently in blunt abdominal trauma, possibly due to an increasing number of high-speed motor accidents and the use of seat belts. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to identify the factors determining the time of surgical intervention and how they affect the outcome of the patient with BBMI. This was achieved by reviewing our experience as a major Victorian trauma service in the management of bowel and mesenteric injuries and comparing this to the experiences reported in the literature. METHODS: A retrospective study reviewing 278 consecutive patients who presented to the Alfred trauma center with blunt bowel and mesenteric injuries over a 6-year period. RESULTS: The patient cohort comprised 278 patients with BBMI (66% were male, 34% were female), of whom 80% underwent a laparotomy, 17% were treated conservatively and 3% were diagnosed post-mortem. In terms of time from admission to laparotomy, 67% were treated within 0-4 h, 9% within 4-8 h, 3% within 8-12 h, 10% within 12-24 h, 4% within 24-48 h and 7% at >48 h. A focused abdominal sonography for trauma (FAST) was performed in 86 patients, of whom 51% had a positive FAST, 44% had a negative FAST and 4% had an equivocal FAST. Overall, 13% of the patient cohort did not have a FAST. Computerized tomography (CT) scans were undertaken preoperatively in 68% of the patients, revealing free gas (22% of patients), bowel-wall thickening (31%), fat and mesenteric stranding or hematoma (38%) and free fluid with no solid organ injury (43%). CONCLUSION: The timing of surgical intervention in cases of BBMI is mostly determined by the clinical examination and the results of the helical CT scan findings. The FAST lacks sensitivity and specificity for identifying bowel and mesenteric trauma. A delayed diagnosis of > 48 h has a significantly higher bowelrelated morbidity but not mortality.

12.
ANZ J Surg ; 74(6): 420-3, 2004 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15191471

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to determine the complication rates associated with intercostal catheter insertion (ICI) performed using Early Management of Severe Trauma (EMST) guidelines on trauma patients admitted through The Alfred Trauma Centre. METHODS: The Alfred Trauma Registry identified demographic and clinical data for patients who underwent ICI in the Alfred hospital following admission for trauma. The medical histories were subsequently reviewed for complications resulting from ICI. RESULTS: There were 211 ICI performed on 173 trauma patients at The Alfred Trauma Centre between July 2001 and June 2002. The mean injury severity score was 34. Mean age was 38 (range 15-82 years), with 77% of the patients being men. Chest injury was the result of blunt trauma in 90.2% and penetrating trauma in 9.8%. ICI occurred in the Trauma Centre (84%), operating theatre (6%), intensive care unit (9%) and in the general ward (1%). Eighty per cent of patients had a unilateral ICI. The indications for ICI were pneumothorax (45.7%), haemothorax (15.0%), haemopneumothorax (28.3%) and tension pneumothorax (7.5%). There were no insertional and 11 (5.2%) positional complications. The infection rate was 2.4% comprising two superficial and three deep (empyema thoraces) infections. No statistically significant association was found between infective complications and age, injury severity score (ISS), haemothorax, penetrating trauma, prehospital needle thoracostomy and time to ICI. There was no mortality arising from ICI complications. CONCLUSION: Intercostal catheter insertion for chest trauma performed in accordance with EMST guidelines has a low complication rate. Prehospital prophylactic chest decompression for ventilated patients with chest trauma, using a lateral rather than an anterior approach, may decrease the incidence of untreated tension pneumothorax.


Subject(s)
Catheterization/adverse effects , Thoracic Injuries/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Catheterization/methods , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Ribs , Thoracic Injuries/complications
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...