Reproductive implications of psychological distress for couples undergoing IVF.

OBJECTIVE: To study implications of psychological distress on in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome of an infertile couple. METHODS: Prospective study in an academic infertility practice setting. Couples undergoing embryo transfer (ET) following IVF were offered participation. Female patient (n = 89) and partner (n = 77) completed questionnaires reflecting dysphoria (POMS) and pessimism (LOT) after undergoing ET. Relationship between dysphoria and pessimism and implications of individual and couple's psychological distress on IVF cycle parameters and outcomes were assessed using multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Statistically significant correlations between dysphoria and pessimism were observed within the individual and between partners, (p < 0.01). Higher couple pessimism correlated with longer duration of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH, p = 0.02); higher partner psychological distress related to lower fertilization rate (FR, p = 0.03). On adjusted analyses, partner's depression score was an independent predictor of reduced likelihood of clinical pregnancy (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Our data validate the concept of a "stressed couple". Adverse implications of a couple's psychological distress for gamete biology (longer duration of COH and lower FR with increasing distress) are suggested. Partner's depressive scores negatively correlated with IVF success. These findings suggest the importance of including partner's evaluation in studies that focus on effects of psychological stress on IVF outcome; future studies should examine whether interventions aimed at reducing psychological stress for the infertile couple may improve IVF cycle success.

Semen parameters are unrelated to BMI but vary with SSRI use and prior urological surgery.

BACKGROUND: Male infertility affects approximately 6% of reproductive-aged men. It has been suggested that overweight men or men with obese body mass index (BMI) experience prolonged time to pregnancy, though the influence of male BMI on fertility remains understudied. AIMS: We hypothesized that BMI is inversely correlated with fertility, manifested by reduced sperm concentration, motility, and morphology. METHODS: Males of age 18 to 50 with semen analyses and self-reported BMI were included (n = 530). Patient parameters analyzed included age, BMI, smoking, urological, and fertility history. Leutinizing hormone (LH), Follicle-stimulating hormone, testosterone, steroid hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) and free androgen index (FAI) levels (n = 55), and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) use (n = 12) were also measured. RESULTS: The men in this study had a mean BMI of 28.2 ± 4.9 kg/m(2) (range = 15-60), which is considered overweight, and a mean semen concentration of 55.4 ± 46.8 million/mL, which is in normal range, according to WHO standard. No consistent relationship was observed between increasing BMI and sperm concentration, motility, or morphology, although the testosterone levels trended downward with increasing BMI; there was a suggestion for decreased sperm concentration in current smokers. Men treated with combination SSRI and other psychotropic agent therapy (n = 12) had significantly reduced sperm motility (P = .009). Not unexpectedly, prior urological surgery (n = 77) was associated with lower sperm concentration (P = .0001) and morphology (P = .0008). When in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) was used as a treatment modality (n = 121), male BMI was not a significant predictor of clinical pregnancy (P = .06). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, we did not observe a significant association between male BMI and sperm concentration, motility or morphology, or clinical pregnancy following IVF-ET. Significantly, SSRI use may affect sperm parameters negatively.

Declining ovarian reserve adversely influences granulosa cell viability.

OBJECTIVE: To identify if declining ovarian reserve adversely influences granulosa cell (GC) parameters in patients undergoing IVF. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Academic IVF Center. PATIENT(S): Twenty-four women undergoing IVF. INTERVENTION(S): Mural and cumulus GCs were harvested (at time of egg retrieval). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Influence of ovarian reserve, reflected by maximal basal FSH levels, on GC (cumulative, mural, and cumulus) counts and viability were investigated. RESULT(S): The FSH levels demonstrated an inverse correlation with cumulative and mural, but not cumulus, GC viability. Adverse influence of increasing FSH on cumulative GC viability was independent of patient's age. The GC counts were uninfluenced by ovarian reserve status. Neither GC count nor viability demonstrated any relationship with clinical pregnancy after IVF. CONCLUSION(S): We observed an adverse association between declining ovarian reserve and GC parameters. We believe these findings may partly explain the suboptimal reproductive performance in these women.