Feasibility of a low concentration test bolus in CT angiography.

AIM: To investigate the feasibility of using a low-concentration test bolus in abdominal aorta computed tomography (CT) angiography (CTA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In 10 patients referred for CTA of the abdominal aorta with a body mass index (BMI) ≤28 kg/m2, a standard test bolus of 10 ml contrast medium (CM; 350 mg iodine/ml) was compared with a low-concentration test bolus (5 ml CM; 350 mg iodine/ml; 1:1 diluted with saline) in terms of time to peak enhancement (tPE) and peak enhancement (PE). RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the standard and low-concentration test bolus in terms of tPE and PE. CONCLUSIONS: A low-concentration test bolus (5 ml, 1:1 diluted with saline) is feasible in patients with a BMI ≤28 kg/m2.

Reducing contrast medium volume and tube voltage in CT angiography of the pulmonary artery.

AIM: To evaluate image quality after contrast medium (CM) and tube voltage reduction in computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the pulmonary artery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients referred for CTA of the pulmonary artery for suspected pulmonary embolism were included. Patients were randomly assigned to Protocol I (100 ml of 350 mg iodine/ml iodinated CM; n=16) or Protocol II (50 ml of 350 mg iodine/ml iodinated CM; n=17). Dual-energy CT (80 kV and 140 kV) was performed in all patients. An averaged weighted series equivalent to a 120 kV image acquisition was reconstructed. The mean attenuation value of CM was measured at eight positions in the pulmonary trunk and pulmonary arteries. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated. Qualitative assessment of the vascular enhancement was performed independently by two experienced radiologists using a three-point scale. Mean attenuation values, image noise, CNR, and SNR of images with 50 ml CM and images with 100 ml CM were compared and mean attenuation values, image noise, CNR, and SNR in 80 kV images and 120 kV images were compared. For qualitative analysis, interobserver variability was analysed using Cohen's kappa statistics. RESULTS: The mean attenuation values in Protocol I and Protocol II were not significantly different at 80 kV (634.6±168.3 versus 537.9±146.7 HU; p=0.088) and 120 kV (482.8±127.7 versus 410.4±106.0 HU; p=0.085). The mean attenuation value at 80 kV was significantly higher than the mean attenuation value at 120 kV in Protocols I and II (p<0.001). The CNR and SNR were higher at 120 kV than at 80 kV in both protocols (p=0.000-0.019); however, there were no significant differences in the CNR and SNR between both protocols (p=0.600-0.952). Qualitative (subjective) analysis showed no statistical significant difference between Protocols I and II (p=0.524-1.000). CONCLUSION: Low tube voltage (80 kV) CTA using 50 ml CM is not inferior to CTA at 120 kV using 100 ml CM.

A non-invasive cardiac output measurement as an alternative to the test bolus technique during CT angiography.

AIM: To investigate the association between a non-invasive cardiac output (CO) measurement and the scan delay, as derived from a test bolus injection protocol. The secondary objective was to determine which factors affect the relationship between the CO and scan delay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five patients referred for a contrast-enhanced (thorax-)abdomen CT examination were included in this feasibility study. A test bolus examination was performed prior to the abdominal CT. During the test bolus injection, the CO of the patient was measured using a non-invasive finger-cuff measurement. Associations were analysed using linear regression analyses. Age, gender, height, weight, and blood pressure were included as potential confounders. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis showed a negative and significant association between CO and delay. The regression formula was as follows: scan delay (seconds) = 26.8-1.6 CO (l/min), with a 95% CI between -2.3 and -1.0 (p<0.001). Weight appeared to be a confounder in this relation, and gender and blood pressure were effect modifiers. There was no interaction between scan delay and age, height and weight. CONCLUSIONS: There is a negative and significant association between the non-invasive CO measurement and the CT scan delay; however, to validate these findings a larger cohort study is needed to investigate whether the non-invasively determined scan delay is as accurate as the use of a test bolus.

Low-dose CT angiography of the abdominal aorta and reduced contrast medium volume: Assessment of image quality and radiation dose.

AIM: To determine the effect of using 80 kV tube voltage and a reduced amount of contrast medium on the image quality and radiation dose of computed tomography angiography (CTA) of the abdominal aorta. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who were referred for a CTA examination of the abdominal aorta were included in this technical efficacy study. Thirty patients were divided randomly into two groups. Fifteen patients underwent a dual-energy CT (DECT) protocol (Group A). Fifteen patients were scanned with the use of an automated tube potential selection algorithm tool (Group B). In both protocols, a test bolus injection of 10 ml ioversol (350 mg iodine/ml) was used, followed by 20 ml of 1:1 saline-diluted contrast medium. Quantitative analysis comprised determination of the mean attenuation and contrast-to-noise ratio. Qualitative image analysis was performed independently by five radiologists. The estimated radiation dose in terms of CT dose index and effective dose was recorded and compared with a standard 120 kV protocol. RESULTS: In Group B, six patients underwent CTA at 80 kV, seven patients underwent CTA at 100 kV and two patients underwent CTA at 120 kV. The mean contrast-enhancement values of Group A (80 kV) and the 80 kV subgroup of Group B were 16.5% and 27.6% higher compared to the 100 kV subgroup of Group B, these differences were, however, not significant. There were no significant differences in mean image quality between groups. In patients undergoing CTA at 80 kV the effective dose decreased by up to 51.3% compared to a conventional 120 kV CTA protocol. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study support the hypothesis that 80 kV in CTA of the abdominal aorta can reliably be used with only 30 ml contrast medium in total and a 50% reduction in radiation dose. The overall image quality was diagnostically adequate; however, it appeared to be suboptimal in patients with a BMI above 28 kg/m(2).