Evaluation of the fully automated, sample-to-result Seegene STARlet-AIOS platform for detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus A, influenza virus B, and RSV.

Early, accurate, and bulk detection of respiratory pathogens is essential for patient management and infection control. STARlet-All-in-One System (AIOS) (Seegene) is a new, fully automated, sample-to-result, molecular diagnostic platform. This study describes the first evaluation of STARlet-AIOS, by testing the Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2 (AS) and Allplex™ SARS-CoV-2/FluA/FluB/RSV combination (AC) assays in comparison to the SARS-CoV-2 assays used at our institute. Over a 3-week period, all naso-/oropharyngeal specimens tested for SARS-CoV-2 using either GeneXpert, Panther, or in-house developed test (LDT) were tested on the AIOS using the AS or AC assays. In addition, retrospective cohorts of specimens containing SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus A, influenza virus B, and RSV were tested. Discrepant results were re-tested with another assay used in this study. Hands-on time (HOT) and turn-around time (TAT) of the different systems were monitored and compared. A total of 738 specimens were tested on the AIOS using the AS assay. In addition, 210 specimens were tested using the AC assay. Overall agreement for SARS-CoV-2 detection was established as 98.5% and 95.2% for the AS and AC assay, respectively. Retrospective testing revealed high agreements for all targets, except for influenza virus A (agreement of 87.5%). HOT of the system was comparable to the HOT of GeneXpert and Panther and TAT comparable to Panther and LDT. The AIOS proved to be a robust sample-to-result system with low HOT and moderate TAT. This study showed reliable detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus B, and RSV, whereas detection of influenza virus A using the AC assay appeared to be suboptimal.

Haemostatic differences between SARS-CoV-2 PCR-positive and negative patients at the time of hospital admission.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is associated with thrombosis. We conducted a cohort study of consecutive patients, suspected of SARS-CoV-2 infection presented to the emergency department. We investigated haemostatic differences between SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive and negative patients, with dedicated coagulation analysis. The 519 included patients had a median age of 66 years, and 52.5% of the patients were male. Twenty-six percent of the patients were PCR-positive for SARS-CoV-2.PCR positive patients had increased levels of fibrinogen and (active) von Willebrand Factor (VWF) and decreased levels of protein C and α2-macroglobulin compared to the PCR negative patients. In addition, we found acquired activated protein C resistance in PCR positive patients. Furthermore, we found that elevated levels of factor VIII and VWF and decreased levels of ADAMTS-13 were associated with an increased incidence of thrombosis in PCR positive patients. In conclusion, we found that PCR positive patients had a pronounced prothrombotic phenotype, mainly due to an increase of endothelial activation upon admission to the hospital. These findings show that coagulation tests may be considered useful to discriminate severe cases of COVID-19 at risk for thrombosis.

Evaluation of the sample-to-result, random access NeuMoDx platform for viral load testing of Cytomegalovirus and Epstein Barr virus in clinical specimens.

BACKGROUND: The detection and follow up of cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) viral loads (VL) are crucial in the management of immunocompromised patients. Recently, molecular CE-IVD assays for detection and quantification of CMV and EBV have been launched for use on the random-access and sample-to-result NeuMoDx 96 and 288 platforms (Qiagen). OBJECTIVE: Evaluating the qualitative and quantitative performance of the NeuMoDx CMV and EBV assays in clinical specimens compared to a lab developed tests (LDT) and the CE-IVD assays on the Abbott m2000 system. METHOD: Both a prospective and a retrospective panel, compiled of non-detectable (ND), non-quantifiable (NQ) and quantifiable VLs in plasma samples have been evaluated for both CMV and EBV: NeuMoDx versus LDT and NeuMoDx versus Abbott m2000. Quantitative agreement was determined for samples with a quantifiable VL on both systems. RESULTS: Qualitative and quantitative agreement between the NeuMoDx and LUMC's LDT CMV assays was 88%. Qualitative agreement between the NeuMoDx and Abbott m2000 CMV assays was 92% and quantitative agreement was 87%. Qualitative and quantitative agreement between the NeuMoDx and the LDT EBV assays was 87%. Qualitative agreement between the NeuMoDx and Abbott m2000 EBV assays was 91% and quantitative agreement was 0%. CONCLUSION: These data show that the NeuMoDx assays are suitable for both detection and quantification of CMV and EBV in a medium- to high throughput diagnostic setting, but that differences in sensitivity and quantification (for EBV, NeuMoDx versus Abbott m2000) warrant an extensive transition period when using the respective assays for following VL in patient samples.

Whole-genome sequencing analysis reveals the spread of a vanB-carrying transposon among different vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium clinical isolates in a non-endemic setting.

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), particularly Enterococcus faecium (VREfm), can cause serious nosocomial infections, and have been responsible for healthcare-associated outbreaks. Spreading of VREfm can occur both clonally and by the dissemination of mobile genetic elements. AIM: To report prospective analysis of whole-genome sequencing (WGS) data, including both core-genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) and transposon analysis, during a vanB VREfm outbreak. METHODS: Screening for vanB-positive VREfm isolates was performed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) on an overnight enriched broth and, if positive, subculture was performed. vanB-positive VREfm isolates underwent WGS. Generated data were used for molecular typing that was performed by cgMLST using SeqSphere. For transposon characterization, sequence data were mapped against the reference sequence of transposon Tn1549 using CLC Genomics Workbench, or de-novo assemblies were used for BLASTN comparisons. RESULTS: In total, 1358 real-time PCRs were performed. Two hundred and fifty-one specimens from 207 patients tested positive on PCR for vanB, of which 13 specimens obtained from six patients were identified as vanB VREfm positive on culture. These six patients harboured seven unique isolates belonging to four cluster types: CT118 (N=2), CT2483 (N=3), CT2500 (N=1) and CT2501 (N=1). Transposon analysis revealed the presence of an identical vanB-carrying transposon in the isolates cultured from all six patients that could be linked based on epidemiological data. CONCLUSION: A vanB VREfm outbreak occurred in the study hospital, including six patients with isolates belonging to four cluster types. In-depth transposon analysis revealed that dissemination of transposon Tn1549 rather than clonal spread was the cause of the outbreak.

Prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Mycoplasma genitalium and Trichomonas vaginalis including relevant resistance-associated mutations in a single center in the Netherlands.

PURPOSE: In this study, we report the prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT), Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV) amongst clinical specimens of patients suspected for sexually transmitted infections received at our laboratory and in addition report the prevalence of resistance-associated mutations (RAM) for ciprofloxacin in NG and azithromycin and moxifloxacin in MG. METHODS: All specimens received from December 2018 to May 2019 were tested for the four pathogens. In addition, the presence of RAM associated with resistance to ciprofloxacin in NG and to azithromycin and moxifloxacin in MG was determined by different real-time PCR assays on all NG- and MG-positive specimens. RESULTS: CT was detected most often (267/2613, 10.2%), followed by MG (106/2592, 4.1%), NG (41/2613, 1.6%) and TV (10/2592, 0.4%) amongst all specimens. The prevalence of ciprofloxacin RAM in NG was 21.2%, and the prevalence of RAM in MG was 40.6% for azithromycin and 8.1% for moxifloxacin. Nearly all specimens containing moxifloxacin-resistant MG also contained azithromycin-resistant MG. CONCLUSION: CT is found most often in our population followed by MG and NG. By using molecular assays to detect RAM supplementary to pathogen identification of NG and MG, optimal therapy can be advised.

Low prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 in plasma of COVID-19 patients presenting to the emergency department.

Correct and reliable identification of SARS-CoV-2 in COVID-19 suspected patients is essential for diagnosis. Respiratory samples should always be tested with real-time PCR for SARS-CoV-2. In addition, blood samples have been tested, but without consistent results and therefore the added value of this sample type is unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 by real-time PCR in blood samples obtained from PCR-proven COVID-19 patients and in addition to elaborate on the potential use of blood for diagnostics. In this single center study, blood samples drawn from patients at the emergency department with proven COVID-19 infection based on a positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR in respiratory samples were tested for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Samples from 118 patients were selected, of which 102 could be included in the study (median age was 65 (IQR 10), 65.7 % men). In six (5.9 %) of the tested samples, SARS-CoV-2 was identified by real-time PCR. In conclusion, SARS-CoV-2 can be detected by real-time PCR in plasma samples from patients with proven COVID-19, but only in a minority of the patients. Plasma should therefore not be used as primary sample in an acute phase setting to identify SARS-CoV-2 infection. These findings are important to complete the knowledge on possible sample types to test to diagnose COVID-19.

Multiplex real-time PCR for diagnosing malaria in a non-endemic setting: a prospective comparison to conventional methods.

Almost a decade ago our diagnostic laboratory implemented an in-house real-time PCR for the detection of Plasmodium DNA to diagnose malaria in parallel with conventional diagnostics, i.e., microscopy (thick and thin smears), quantitative buffy coat microscopy (QBC), and a rapid diagnostic test (RDT). Here we report our experiences and make a comparison between the different diagnostic procedures used in this non-endemic setting. All patients during the period February 2009-December 2017 suspected of malaria were prospectively tested at the moment of sample collection. Both PCR and conventional malaria diagnostics were carried out on a total of 839 specimens from 825 patients. In addition, three Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) patients were closely followed by real-time PCR and microscopy after treatment. Overall, 56 samples (55 patients) tested positive by real-time PCR, of which six were missed by microscopy and seven by QBC. RDT showed fairly good results in detecting Pf, whereas specificity was not optimal. RDT failed to detect 10 of 17 non-Pf PCR positive specimens. One Plasmodium malariae patient would have been missed if only conventional diagnostic tests had been used. The high sensitivity of the PCR was confirmed by the number of PCR positive, microscopy negative post-treatment samples. In conclusion, within our routine diagnostic setting, malaria real-time PCR not only showed a high level of agreement with the conventional methods used, but also showed higher sensitivity and better specificity. Still, for complete replacement of the conventional procedures in a non-endemic setting, the time-to-results of the real-time PCR is currently too long.

PCR assays for detection of human astroviruses: In silico evaluation and design, and in vitro application to samples collected from patients in the Netherlands.

BACKGROUND: Human astroviruses (HAstV) comprise three phylogenetically compact and non-adjacent groups of species including classical HAstV (HAstV-C) and the novel ones (HAstV-VA/HMO and HAstV-MLB). Of these, HAstV-C is known to be responsible for gastroenteritis while the novel HAstV are associated with cases of neurological disorders. Accurate detection of all known variants by (real-time) PCR is challenging because of the high intra- and intergroup genetic divergence of HAstV. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate published HAstV PCR assays in silico, design de novo real-time PCR assays that can detect and discriminate three groups of HAstV, and apply those to patient samples to analyse the prevalence of HAstV in stool and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens. STUDY DESIGN: In silico evaluation of published PCR assays and design of real-time PCR assays for detection of different subsets of HAstV was conducted within a common computational framework that used all astrovirus full genome sequences from GenBank. The newly designed real-time PCR assays were evaluated in vitro and applied to faecal samples (collected in January-May 2016) and cerebrospinal fluid specimens (2010-2016) from patients in the Netherlands. RESULTS: Quantitative in silico evaluation of published PCRs is provided. The newly designed real-time PCR assays can reliably assign all available HAstV genome sequences to one of the three phylogenetic groups in silico, and differentiate among HAstV-specific controls in vitro. A total of 556 samples were tested using these PCR assays. Fourteen fecal samples (2.5%) tested positive for HAstV, 3 of which could be identified as the novel HAstV-MLB variants. No novel HAstV were found in CSF specimens. CONCLUSION: Newly designed real-time PCR assays with improved detection of all known HAstV allowed the first-time identification of novel astroviruses from stool samples in the Netherlands.

Comparison of ePlex Respiratory Pathogen Panel with Laboratory-Developed Real-Time PCR Assays for Detection of Respiratory Pathogens.

Infections of the respiratory tract can be caused by a diversity of pathogens, both viral and bacterial. Rapid microbiological diagnosis ensures appropriate antimicrobial therapy as well as effective implementation of isolation precautions. The ePlex respiratory pathogen panel (RP panel) is a novel molecular biology-based assay, developed by GenMark Diagnostics, Inc. (Carlsbad, CA), to be performed within a single cartridge for the diagnosis of 25 respiratory pathogens (viral and bacterial). The objective of this study was to compare the performance of the RP panel with those of laboratory-developed real-time PCR assays, using a variety of previously collected clinical respiratory specimens. A total of 343 clinical specimens as well as 29 external quality assessment (EQA) specimens and 2 different Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus isolates have been assessed in this study. The RP panel showed an agreement of 97.4% with the real-time PCR assay regarding 464 pathogens found in the clinical specimens. All pathogens present in clinical samples and EQA samples with a threshold cycle (CT ) value of <30 were detected correctly using the RP panel. The RP panel detected 17 additional pathogens, 7 of which could be confirmed by discrepant testing. In conclusion, this study shows excellent performance of the RP panel in comparison to real-time PCR assays for the detection of respiratory pathogens. The ePlex system provided a large amount of useful diagnostic data within a short time frame, with minimal hands-on time, and can therefore potentially be used for rapid diagnostic sample-to-answer testing, in either a laboratory or a decentralized setting.

High levels of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in Mycoplasma genitalium warrant antibiotic susceptibility-guided treatment.

OBJECTIVES: Mycoplasma genitalium is a sexually transmitted pathogen, and infection with it is usually treated with macrolides. Unfortunately, emerging resistance to the macrolides has been associated with mutations in region V of the 23S rRNA gene. The aim of this retrospective study was to describe the incidence of macrolide resistance-associated mutations in M. genitalium from patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: All urogenital samples obtained from patients visiting a general practitioner or hospital in the east of the Netherlands that tested positive using the routine M. genitalium real-time PCR (February 2012-November 2014) were included. Following a PCR targeting the 23S rRNA gene, sequencing of the PCR fragments was performed to identify possible macrolide resistance-associated mutations. RESULTS: Forty-eight of the 153 samples (31.4%) included in this study contained a mutation in the 23S rRNA gene. This was reduced to 44/146 (30.1%) if only samples from unique patients were included. The predominant mutations identified were A2058G (16/44; 36.3%), A2059G (14/44; 31.8%) and a unique high proportion of A2058T (12/44; 27.3%). Treatment failure was observed in four patients initially infected with M. genitalium containing macrolide resistance-associated mutations, while in one of these patients subsequent treatment with moxifloxacin resulted in a microbiological cure. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that macrolide resistance-associated mutations in M. genitalium occur with a high frequency. In contrast to studies from other regions, Dutch M. genitalium isolates carry the A2058T mutation at high frequency. Our data confirm the need for prospective detection of macrolide resistance-associated mutations prior to treating patients.

OXY-2-15, a novel variant showing increased ceftazidime hydrolytic activity.

OBJECTIVES: Klebsiella oxytoca is a member of the family of Enterobacteriaceae and often contains the ß-lactamase blaOXY gene. Although this ß-lactamase does not naturally hydrolyse ceftazidime, this study describes possible in vivo selection of a clinical K. oxytoca isolate showing increased MICs of ceftazidime. METHODS: To reveal the molecular mechanism underlying this unusual resistance phenotype, WGS, cloning, overexpression, MIC and steady-state kinetic studies were performed. RESULTS: A patient was treated for a septic episode with ceftazidime (4 g/day). This therapy was based on earlier culture results in which, amongst others, a K. oxytoca (Velp-1) isolate was identified. After 11 days of treatment, K. oxytoca Velp-2 was isolated from a pus sample drained from the wound. The isolate showed increased resistance to ceftazidime (MIC ≥64 mg/L) compared with the original K. oxytoca isolate (Velp-1). WGS revealed the presence of a novel blaOXY-2 allele, designated blaOXY-2-15, with a two amino acid deletion at Ambler positions 168 and 169 compared with OXY-2-2. Cloning blaOXY-2-15 into Escherichia coli TOP10 resulted in increased MICs of ceftazidime, but reduced MICs of most other ß-lactams compared with OXY-2-2. Steady-state kinetics confirmed the results of the MIC data, showing clearly significant ceftazidime hydrolysis. CONCLUSIONS: This report shows the risk of in vivo selection of ceftazidime-resistant K. oxytoca isolates after prolonged ceftazidime treatment. Furthermore, it is the first known report of a K. oxytoca isolate conferring resistance to ceftazidime by a two amino acid deletion in the omega loop of OXY-2-2.

New screening method to detect carriage of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae in patients within 24 hours.

Rapid identification of patients colonized with carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CPE) is essential to prevent introduction and the spread of CPE in the hospital. This article presents the results of a new screening method to detect patients colonized with CPE within 24h after hospital admission. From high-risk patients rectal and throat swabs were collected and incubated overnight, after which DNA was isolated and tested for the most prevalent CPE genes (KPC, NDM, OXA-48, VIM and IMP) by a ligation-mediated real-time polymerase chain reaction. In 14 months 454 patients were screened; in six patients CPE were detected (carriage rate 1.3%).

Distribution of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase genes using a commercial DNA micro-array system.

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) genes are distributed worldwide and their epidemiology is complex. Using the Check-ESBL assay, the distribution of class A ESBL genes in clinical isolates of aerobic Gram-negative bacilli from three laboratories in the East of The Netherlands was determined. Four patient categories were distinguished: (i) patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU); (ii) non-ICU inpatients; (iii) outpatients admitted less than a year before collection of the isolate, (<1); (iv) outpatients admitted more than one-year prior to isolate collection or who had never been hospitalized (>1). From February 2009 until March 2010, out of 491 putative ESBL-positive isolates detected by the Vitek2 or Phoenix automated sensitivity testing systems, ESBL genes were detected in 247 (50.3%) by the Check-ESBL assay. Of these, 116 were from hospitalized patients (35 ICU, 81 non-ICU) and 131 were from outpatients (43 <1, 88 >1). In all, 274 ESBL genes were identified in these 247 isolates: 153 CTX-M-1 group (predominantly in E. coli and K. pneumoniae, 70.4% and 51.6% respectively), 67 CTX-M-9 group (predominantly in E. cloacae, 57.9%), 32 SHV, 14 TEM and 8 CTX-M-2 group. ESBL-producing E. cloacae were significantly more common in hospitalized patients than in outpatients, 20.7% and 3.8% respectively (P=0.001). CTX-M-9 group ESBLs were significantly more prevalent in ICU patients (P=0.003), whereas SHV ESBLs were more common in hospitalized patients than in outpatients (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in distribution of ESBL genes between the two outpatient groups.

Comparison of two commercial molecular assays for simultaneous detection of respiratory viruses in clinical samples using two automatic electrophoresis detection systems.

Two molecular assays were compared with real-time RT-PCR and viral culture for simultaneous detection of common viruses from respiratory samples: a multiplex ligation-dependant probe amplification (MLPA) and a dual priming oligonucleotide system (DPO). In addition, the positive detections of MLPA and DPO were identified using two different automatic electrophoresis systems. A panel of 168 culture-positive and negative samples was tested by the molecular assays for the presence of influenza A and B virus, respiratory syncytial virus, human metapneumovirus, rhinovirus, coronaviruses, parainfluenza viruses and adenovirus. One hundred and twenty-nine (77%) samples were positive as detected by at least one method. Sixty-nine (41%) samples were positive by cell culture (excluding human metapneumovirus and coronaviruses), 116 (69%) by RT-PCR, 127 (76%) by MLPA and 100 (60%) by DPO. The MLPA yielded results in one attempt for all samples included while 12 (7.2%) samples had to be repeated by the DPO assay due to inconclusive results. The MLPA assay performed well in combination with either electrophoresis system, while the performance of the DPO assay was influenced by the electrophoresis systems. Both molecular assays are comparable with real-time RT-PCR, more sensitive than viral culture and can detect dual infections easily. Results can be obtained within 1 day.