Improving community healthcare for patients with Parkinson's disease: the dutch model.

Because of the complex nature of Parkinson's disease, a wide variety of health professionals are involved in care. Stepwise, we have addressed the challenges in the provision of multidisciplinary care for this patient group. As a starting point, we have gained detailed insight into the current delivery of allied healthcare, as well as the barriers and facilitators for optimal care. To overcome the identified barriers, a tertiary referral centre was founded; evidence-based guidelines were developed and cost-effectively implemented within regional community networks of specifically trained allied health professionals (the ParkinsonNet concept). We increasingly use ICT to bind these professional networks together and also to empower and engage patients in making decisions about their health. This comprehensive approach is likely to be feasible for other countries as well, so we currently collaborate in a European collaboration to improve community care for persons with Parkinson's disease.

Evaluation of a Patient-Specific Index as an outcome measure for physiotherapy in Parkinson's disease.

AIM: The aim of this paper was to develop and evaluate a patient-specific index for physiotherapy in Parkinson's disease (PSI-PD). METHODS: In the PSI-PD, patients 1) select problematic activities out of a predefined list, with one self-report item; 2) rank selected items in order of importance; and 3) rate severity for each ranked item. To examine test-retest reliability, a cohort of patients was asked to complete the PSI-PD twice. Afterwards, validity was evaluated using a telephone interview. RESULTS: The PSI-PD was completed twice by 81 patients. Test-retest agreement for the selection of activity limitations was 73% to 94%. Items ranked by patients were categorized into domains, of which gait, transfers and dexterity were rated most frequently (41%-70%). Test-retest agreement for ranked domains ranged from 74% to 82%. Interviews confirmed that the PSI-PD reliably identified problem areas. CONCLUSIONS: The PSI-PD is a relevant, reliable and valid instrument to identify limitations in everyday activities that are important for both PD patients and physiotherapists.

Quality indicators for physiotherapy in Parkinson's disease.

AIM: The aim of this study was to develop quality indicators for physiotherapy in Parkinson's disease (PD) according to international criteria. METHODS: Indicators were based on an evidence-based guideline for physiotherapy in PD. Guideline recommendations were transformed into indicators and rated for their relevance by an expert panel. Relevant indicators were incorporated into a questionnaire termed ''Quality Indicators for Physiotherapy in PD'' (QIP-PD). The QIP-PD was piloted among 105 physiotherapists. The adjusted version was evaluated in 46 physiotherapists with specific expertise in PD and in 795 general physiotherapists. The following clinimetric aspects of the QIP-PD were tested: completeness of answers, response distribution, internal consistency, and discriminative power. The reliability of the QIP-PD was evaluated by interviews among a randomly selected cohort of 32 PD experts and 32 general physiotherapists. RESULTS: The expert panel selected 16 indicators, which were transformed into an adjusted 17-item QIP-PD. The adjusted QIP-PD was completed by 41 expert physiotherapists and 286 general physiotherapists. Comple-teness of item scores ranged from 95-98%. Six items were excluded from the final analyses as they showed ceiling effect among both groups, or lacked discriminative power. The total QIP-PD score for the 11 items was significantly higher for expert physiotherapists (35.1+/-4.2) compared to general physiotherapists (22.2+/-7.7; P=0.01). Internal consistency was good (Crohnbach's alpha 0.84). QIP-PD scores of therapists and interviewers (correlated using Intraclass Correlations Coefficients) ranged from 0.63 to 0.75. CONCLUSIONS: The QIP-PD is a relevant, feasible, valid, discriminative and reliable instrument to measure adherence to guidelines for physiotherapy in PD. In addition, the results underscore that quality improvement interventions for physiotherapy in PD are needed, as guideline adherence is suboptimal in physiotherapists without specific PD expertise.

Multidisciplinary care for patients with Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic and progressive neurodegenerative disorder with a complex phenotype, featuring a wide variety of both motor and non-motor symptoms. Current medical management is usually monodisciplinary, with an emphasis on drug treatment, sometimes supplemented with deep brain surgery. Despite optimal medical management, most patients become progressively disabled. Allied health care may provide complementary benefits to PD patients, even for symptoms that are resistant to pharmacotherapy or surgery. This notion is increasingly supported by scientific evidence. In addition, the role of allied health care is now documented in recent clinical practice guidelines that are available for physiotherapy, occupational therapy and speech-language therapy. Unfortunately, adequate delivery of allied health care is threatened by the insufficient expertise among most therapists, and the generally low patient volumes for each individual therapist. Moreover, most allied health interventions are used in isolation, with insufficient collaboration and communication with other disciplines involved in the care for PD patients. Clinical experience suggests that optimal management requires a multidisciplinary approach, with multifactorial health plans tailored to the needs of each individual patient. Although the merits of specific allied health care interventions have been scientifically proven for other chronic disorders, only few studies have tried to provide a scientific basis for a multidisciplinary care approach in PD. The few studies published so far were not yet convincing. We conclude by providing recommendations for current multidisciplinary care in PD, while highlighting the need for future clinical trials to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a multidisciplinary team approach.

Allied health care interventions and complementary therapies in Parkinson's disease.

Allied health care and complementary therapies are used by many patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). For allied health care, supportive scientific evidence is gradually beginning to emerge, and interventions are increasingly integrated in the treatment programs for PD patients. To evaluate whether such multidisciplinary programs are justifiable, we review the literature of allied health care and complementary therapies in PD. According to the level of available evidence, we provide recommendations for clinical practice. Finally, we discuss the need for an improved organization of allied health care, and identify topics for future research to further underpin the pros and cons of allied health care and complementary therapies in PD.