Soft tissue-based registration of intraoral scan with cone beam computed tomography scan.

The aim of this study was to evaluate a novel soft tissue-based method to register an intraoral scan (IOS) with a cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. IOS and CBCT data were obtained from eight dentate patients (mean age 21±2 years; three male, five female) and 14 fully edentulous patients (mean age 56±9 years; eight male, six female). An algorithm was developed to create a soft tissue model of the CBCT scan, which allowed a soft tissue-based registration to be performed with the IOS. First, validation was performed on dentate jaws with registration of the palatal mucosal surface and accuracy evaluation at the level of the teeth. Second, fully edentulous jaws were registered using both the palatal and alveolar crest mucosal surfaces. Distance maps were created to measure the method accuracy. The mean registration error was 0.49±0.26mm for the dentate jaws. Registration of the fully edentulous jaws had a mean error of 0.16±0.08mm at the palate and 0.16±0.05mm at the alveolar crest. In conclusion, the high accuracy of this registration method may allow the digital workflow to be optimized when no teeth are available to perform a regular registration procedure.

Fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography scans.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical accuracy of the fusion of intra-oral scans in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans using two commercially available software packages. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten dry human skulls were subjected to structured light scanning, CBCT scanning, and intra-oral scanning. Two commercially available software packages were used to perform fusion of the intra-oral scans in the CBCT scan to create an accurate virtual head model: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™. The structured light scanner was used as a gold standard and was superimposed on the virtual head models, created by IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, using an Iterative Closest Point algorithm. Differences between the positions of the intra-oral scans obtained with the software packages were recorded and expressed in six degrees of freedom as well as the inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The tested software packages, IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™, showed a high level of accuracy compared to the gold standard. The accuracy was calculated for all six degrees of freedom. It was noticeable that the accuracy in the cranial/caudal direction was the lowest for IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ in both the maxilla and mandible. The inter- and intra-observer intra-class correlation coefficient showed a high level of agreement between the observers. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: IPS CaseDesigner® and OrthoAnalyzer™ are reliable software packages providing an accurate fusion of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT. Both software packages can be used as an accurate fusion tool of the intra-oral scan in the CBCT which provides an accurate basis for 3D virtual planning.