Kinetic studies during peripheral blood stem cell collection show CD34+ cell recruitment intra-apheresis.

A sufficient number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood stem cell product is important to achieve a rapid and sustained engraftment. The purpose of the present work was to study CD34+ cell kinetics during leukapheresis. Blood samples before and after leukapheresis were analysed for CD34+ cells in 205 procedures. The number of CD34+ cells after plus the number of CD34+ cells harvested was 1.5-fold greater than the number available at the beginning of the procedure, indicating recruitment of CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. In a subgroup of 66 procedures, granulocytes and platelets were measured. In contrast to CD34+ cells, these cell fractions were not recruited to the blood stream during leukapheresis. An additional nine patients were studied with serial blood measurements during leukapheresis, showing an initial decline that was followed by an increase in CD34+ cells during leukapheresis. In conclusion, CD34+ cells are recruited to the blood during the leukapheresis procedure in contrast to granulocytes and platelets.

Mobilisation of tumour cells along with CD34+ cells to peripheral blood in multiple myeloma.

BACKGROUND: Cells belonging to the malignant clone are found in the peripheral blood in myeloma patients. In order to minimise the content of tumour cells in the stem cell product it is crucial to perform stem cell harvest at a time when tumour cells in the peripheral blood are at a minimum. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the mobilisation kinetics of normal CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells during mobilisation with either G-CSF alone or high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy) plus G-CSF. DESIGN AND METHODS: Morning blood samples were drawn each day during mobilisation from start of G-CSF or HDCy and to the end of leukapheresis, and were analysed by flow cytometry for content of CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells (CD38+ + CD45-). Tumour cells were also estimated by a patient-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method based on the 5' nuclease TaqMan technology. RESULTS: Flow cytometry data from 16 patients showed concomitant mobilisation of CD34+ cells and myeloma plasma cells. Seven patients were mobilised twice; first with G-CSF alone and then with HDCy plus G-CSF. There was no difference between the two mobilisation regimens regarding tumour cell mobilisation kinetics. Real-time PCR was performed in one patient and confirmed the mobilisation of tumour cells at the time when CD34+ blood cells were at a maximum. CONCLUSIONS: Tumour cells are mobilised to the peripheral blood at the same time as CD34+ cells in multiple myeloma patients after priming with both G-CSF alone and HDCy in combination with G-CSF.

A comparative study of sequential priming and mobilisation of progenitor cells with rhG-CSF alone and high-dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF.

Stem cell mobilisation can be achieved either by administration of rhG-CSF alone or after high-dose cyclophosphamide (HDCy) plus rhG-CSF. We have compared both mobilisation procedures intra-individually in 43 patients with haematological malignancies. Furthermore, the toxicity data were registered. The CD34+ cell yield was higher after mobilisation with HDCy plus rhG-CSF than after rhG-CSF alone in 21 out of 22 patients who were actually harvested after both procedures. If a patient mobilised insufficiently after rhG-CSF alone, the yield of CD34+ cells after the following HDCy priming was lower compared to patients who mobilised sufficiently after rhG-CSF priming alone. In 12 patients with B cell malignancies a reduced number of B cells such as CD10+, CD19+, CD20+ cells in bone marrow as well as in leukapheresis products was observed after HDCy plus rhG-CSF compared to rhG-CSF alone. Toxicity data revealed HDCy as a relatively toxic priming regimen with all patients hospitalised and 74% experiencing neutropenic fever and administration of intravenous antibiotics. In two patients, seizure-like episodes were observed during cyclophosphamide bolus infusion. In conclusion, HDCy increased the yield of CD34+cell and reduced B cells in leukapheresis products indicating reduced tumour cell load compared with rhG-CSF priming alone. The efficacy of HDCy priming is limited by its profound toxicity and morbidity. Studies evaluating efficacy and safety of lower doses of cyclophosphamide are needed. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2000) 26, 717-722.

Subsets of CD34+ hematopoietic progenitors and platelet recovery after high dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Randomized clinical trials have shown that peripheral blood stem cell transplantations (PBSCT) with appropriate doses of CD34+ cells are associated with rapid, complete and sustained recovery of marrow functions. Nevertheless, in a minority af patients delayed platelet recovery may occur and it remains to be established whether analysis of transplanted CD34+ cell subsets may demonstrate correlation with this phenomenon. We studied a series of 80 consecutive transplanted patients with the aim of evaluating the effect of CD34+ stem cell numbers and, in a subgroup of 32 patients, the effect of the lineage specific subset numbers on time to platelet engraftment (i.e. time to platelet counts higher than 20x10(9)/L for two consecutive days without the need for platelet transfusions). DESIGN AND METHODS: Different clinical and paraclinical factors were examined in a multivariate analysis for effect on platelet engraftment in 80 patients. RESULTS: The number of CD34+ cells/kg infused was the most important factor predicting the time to platelet engraftment. Patients receiving more than 10x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg had prompt platelet engraftment. The majority of the patients (78%) received fewer than 10x10(3) CD34+ cells/kg and 17/62 (27%) of these patients experienced delayed platelet engraftment. In 32 patients receiving fewer than 10x10(6) CD34+ cells/kg we focused on the content of different lineage specific CD34+ subsets in the PBSC products. The most significant correlation was recognized for CD34+/CD61+ megakaryocytic cell number and platelet engraftment. An inverse correlation between the CD34+/CD38Eth subset and platelet engraftment was found, indicating that a high number of CD34+/CD38Eth in the PBSC product might increase the risk for delayed engraftment. These results were further confirmed by the observation that patients who experienced platelet engraftment after day 20 had significantly more CD34+/CD38Eth cells/kg infused than patients with fast engraftment. INTERPRETATION AND CONCLUSIONS: The number of total CD34+ cells/kg infused was the most important factor predicting time to platelet engraftment. CD34+ subset analysis in a subgroup of patients suggests that a high number of uncommitted progenitors may be associated with slower platelet recovery than transplantation with a higher fraction of more committed peripheral blood stem cells.

Evaluation of mobilized CD34+ cell counts to guide timing and yield of large-scale collection by leukapheresis.

We have previously reported a more than 50% risk of insufficient harvests (< 2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) following a fixed timing of leukapheresis in an unselected patient population collected for autologous stem cell transplantation. The failures were easily identified as patients who had < 20,000/ml CD34+ blood cells at the time of harvest. Consequently, in an attempt to optimize the timing strategy, we decided to perform daily analysis of the blood levels and perform leukapheresis within 24 h after the blood cell count exceeded 20,000 CD34+/ml. The results of this prospective study showed (a) that leukapheresis collections that were initiated based on the CD34+ blood level resulted in a success rate of 85% following 1-3 day harvests, (b) that high-level mobilizers with > 80,000 CD34+ cells/ml can be harvested successfully by only one procedure, and (c) that low-level mobilizers with < 40,000 CD34+ cells/ml still have a high risk of inadequate harvests. In summary, the optimized timing strategy is effective, but there is still room for improvement. First, new potent priming procedures for low-level and bad mobilizers are required, and second, algorithms to reduce the leukapheresis volume and time for high-level mobilizers should be established.

Improved priming for mobilization of and optimal timing for harvest of peripheral blood stem cells.

The time of stem cell harvest and the mobilization regimen may play important roles in terms of achieving adequate numbers of stem cells by leukapheresis. To optimize the timing of leukapheresis, we have determined simultaneously the number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood as well as in the leukapheresis product of 214 apheresis procedures performed in 66 unselected patients with malignant hematologic diseases and solid tumors. A significant correlation between the number of CD34+ cells in peripheral blood and the leukapheresis product (R = 0.8) was found. The presence of more than 20 x 10(3)/ml blood CD34+ cells gave a sufficient yield (> or = 1.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg) in 81% of the cases. In an attempt to compare two priming regimens, we performed leukapheresis twice in 12 patients with stable disease. In the first sequence, stem cells were mobilized with rhG-CSF (10 micrograms/kg/day) alone and, in the second sequence, with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) plus rhG-CSF. A significantly higher yield of CD34+ cells and a better correlation between CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and the leukapheresis product were found after priming with high-dose cyclophosphamide plus rhG-CSF, compared with priming with rhG-CSF alone. In a multivariate analysis, three factors were found to correlate with the yield of CD34+ cells, namely prior chemotherapy, bone marrow function, and the mobilization regimen. The use of cyclophosphamide priming improves CD34+ mobilization, and the introduction of blood CD34+ level optimizes the timing for harvest of stem cells, which should be performed early during treatment of malignancies.