Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Am J Perinatol ; 40(16): 1811-1819, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34839470

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Silver dressings have been associated with a decrease in postoperative pain in selected populations, but it is unknown if the benefit can be observed after cesarean deliveries. We sought to evaluate the impact of silver nylon dressings in reducing postoperative pain after cesarean delivery. STUDY DESIGN: A secondary analysis of data from a blinded randomized clinical trial of women undergoing cesarean delivery scheduled and unscheduled at a single site was conducted. Women were recruited for participation from a single site and randomized to a silver nylon dressing or an identical-appearing gauze wound dressing. Wounds were evaluated in the outpatient clinic at 1 and 6 weeks after delivery and patient responded to the modified patient scar assessment scale. The primary outcome of this analysis was inpatient opioid and nonopioid analgesic dispensed. The secondary outcome was patient-reported pain at the 1- and 6-week postpartum visits. Data were analyzed using chi-square test, Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test, Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney's test, and logistic regression where appropriate. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Among the 649 participants, women allocated to the silver nylon dressing group, when compared with the gauze group, were similar in the amount of dispensed opioid and nonopioid analgesic medications (morphine equivalent milligrams of opioids dispensed [82.5 vs. 90 mg, p = 0.74], intravenous nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) [120 vs. 120 mg, p = 0.55], and oral NSAIDs [4,800 vs. 5,600 mg in the gauze group, p = 0.65]). After adjusting for confounding variables, postoperative wound infection (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 11.70; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.51-30.31) at 1-week postoperative and again at 6-week postoperative (aOR: 5.59; 95% CI: 1.03-30.31) but not gauze dressing was associated with patient-reported postoperative pain. CONCLUSION: Among women undergoing cesarean delivery, silver nylon dressing was not associated with a reduction in postoperative pain. KEY POINTS: · Silver dressings showed no decrease in pain medications.. · Wound infection is associated with pain postoperatively.. · Silver dressings did not reduce postoperative pain..


Subject(s)
Analgesics, Non-Narcotic , Silver , Pregnancy , Humans , Female , Silver/therapeutic use , Nylons , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Bandages , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Pain, Postoperative/prevention & control , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal
2.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 221(1): 57.e1-57.e7, 2019 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30849351

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections are associated with significant healthcare cost and burden. Silver-impregnated dressings have been associated with a decrease in surgical site infections in select populations, but it is unknown whether the benefit can be observed after cesarean deliveries. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the impact of silver nylon dressings in reducing superficial surgical site infections after cesarean delivery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A blinded randomized clinical trial of women undergoing scheduled or unscheduled cesarean delivery at a single site was conducted. Women were recruited for participation from September 2013 to June 2016. Women with vertical skin incisions were excluded. Enrolled participants were randomized to silver nylon dressing or an identical-appearing gauze wound dressing. Wounds were evaluated in the outpatient office at 1 week and 6 weeks after delivery. The primary outcome was superficial surgical site infection as defined by Centers for Disease Control criteria at any time within the first 6 weeks after cesarean delivery. A sample size of 330 per group (n = 660) was planned to compare the 2 arms. Data were analyzed using the χ2, Fisher exact test, Student t test, Mann-Whitney U test, and logistic regression where appropriate, and a value of P < .05 was considered significant. RESULTS: Among the 657 participants, overall, the primary outcome was similar between the 2 groups (4.6% in the silver nylon group vs 4.2% in the gauze group, P = .96). Women allocated to silver nylon, when compared to those who were allocated to gauze, had similar rates of superficial surgical site infection within 1 week (1.2% vs 0.9%) and within 6 weeks ( 4.6% vs 4.2%) after delivery (P >.99). The 2 groups were similar in age (30.9 ± 5.6 vs 31.0 ± 5.5 years, P = .95), body mass index (36.2 ± 8.7 vs 35.3 ± 8.2 kg/m2, P = .19), pregestational diabetes (6.2% vs 3.4%, P = .14), gestational diabetes (7.9% vs 7.3%, P = .88), cesarean delivery after labor (31.9% vs 31.1%, P = .86), presence of chorioamnionitis (5.2% vs 2.1% P = .06), and operative time (56.4 ± 20.6 vs 55.9 ± 17 minutes, P = .69). After adjusting for clinical and sociodemographic confounding variables, current smoking (adjusted odds ratio, 4.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.8-13.4) body mass index ≥40 kg/m2 (adjusted odds ratio, 3.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-6.8), and surgery length (minutes) (adjusted odds ratio, 1.02; 95% confidence interval, 1.002-1.04), but not use of gauze dressing, were associated with superficial surgical site infections. CONCLUSION: Among women undergoing cesarean delivery, silver nylon dressing was not more effective than gauze in reducing the risk of superficial surgical site infections.


Subject(s)
Bandages , Cesarean Section , Silver Compounds/therapeutic use , Surgical Wound Infection/prevention & control , Adult , Body Mass Index , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Obesity, Maternal/epidemiology , Obesity, Morbid/epidemiology , Operative Time , Pregnancy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Smoking/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...