Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 54(6): 375-81, 2015 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26676735

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many regional German MDRO-networks aim to improve the medical rehabilitation of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and other multidrug-resistant pathogens. In 2014, the German Commission for Hospital Hygiene and Infection Control (KRINKO) released revised recommendations for the care of patients with MRSA. In particular, for rehabilitation facilities, these recommendations stipulated a medical risk analysis to establish necessary hygiene measures, and provide specific recommendations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on a large investigation carried out in 21 rehabilitation facilities covering different medical specialties, medical risk analyses according to KRINKO were performed, and the findings evaluated separately for orthopedic, cardiologic, oncologic, neurologic, or geriatric facilities, as well as for all institutions taken together. RESULTS: The overall colonization pressure, i. e. the point prevalence of MRSA and extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative pathogens (ESBL) among hospitalized rehabilitation patients was found to be 0.7% and 7.7%, respectively. Impairment of the intact skin (an established risk factor for persisting MRSA colonization and MRSA infection) was found in 7% of the patients, impaired mobility requiring enhanced level of care in 4.1%, and mental confusion and/or incontinence (potentially impairing the application of hygiene measures) in 11% of patients. Compared to the total study population, there was an increase in all risk factors in geriatric and neurologic rehabilitation patients: skin barrier breaches (in neurologic and in geriatric patients: 18.3 and 19.2%, respectively), impaired mobility (32.7 and 37.0%, respectively), and mental confusion/incontinence (24.5 and 28.0%, respectively). In addition, geriatric patients demonstrated an increased overall prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms (MRSA: 9.4%; ESBL: 22.7%). DISCUSSION: Risk analysis according to KRINKO showed that in rehabilitation facilities with internal medicine or orthopedics specialties, there was a comparably lower risk for transmission, colonization, and/or infection with multidrug-resistant pathogens, as against institutions with neurologic or geriatric specialty. It appears that in the first type of rehabilitation facilities, consistently carried out basic hygiene measures are sufficient while in neurologic or geriatric rehabilitation hospitals, these measures should be supplemented with additional hygiene measures based on medical risk analysis. Furthermore, for infection control purposes in rehabilitation facilities, patient isolation will be rarely necessary or appropriate. These analyses suggest that in the future, rehabilitation programs for MRSA/ESBL-colonized patients will be more successful.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Hygiene , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Infection/microbiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Equipment Contamination/prevention & control , Equipment and Supplies/microbiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Assessment/methods , Young Adult
2.
Rehabilitation (Stuttg) ; 54(5): 339-45, 2015 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26505186

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While a limited number of studies have investigated the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in medical rehabilitation institutions, almost no data on the colonization of rehabilitation patients with multiresistant gram-negative rods is available. Here we report on a large multicenter study on the prevalence of MRSA and multiresistant pathogens in rehabilitation institutions in the Rhine-Main area in 2014. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Altogether, 21 rehabilitation hospitals participated. For all patients, age, gender, previous history of hospitalizations, surgery, previous colonization with multidrug-resistant organisms, use of a medical device, current antimicrobial therapy, and the current infection status were ascertained. On voluntary basis, nare and throat swabs were taken for analysis of MRSA and rectal swabs were tested for extended spectrum betalactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria (ESBL). RESULTS: 50% of 2 440 patients had a history of hospitalization within the previous 6 months while 39% had undergone surgery during the past 30 days. Approximately a quarter of the patients had been transferred to a rehabilitation hospital directly from an acute care hospital, had been under antimicrobial therapy with the past three months, or had travelled to a foreign country within the previous year. Risk factors such as lesions of the intact skin or presence of medical devices were rarely reported (< 5%) within the exception of patients undergoing geriatric or neurologic acute care rehabilitation. 0.7% (15/2155) of the patients were colonized with MRSA, while 7.7% (110/1434) showed a positive result for ESBL. The highest prevalence rates for multiresistant organisms were encountered among patients with neurologic rehabilitation (MRSA, 1.3%, and ESBL, 10.2%) or with geriatric rehabilitation (MRSA, 9.4%, and ESBL, 22.7%). CONCLUSION: In the rehabilitation patient population, the prevalence rates of MRSA and ESBL were found to be in the range of rates encountered in the general population (reported rates for MRSA, 0.5%, and ESBL, 6.3%). The known risk factors for MRSA such as skin lesions, medical devices and previous history for MRSA were also confirmed among this patient population. Direct transfer from an acute care hospital, antimicrobial treatment during the past 3 months, and wounds proved significant risk factors for ESBL colonization. Patients of neurologic rehabilitation and geriatric patients showed the highest rates of risk factors and the highest prevalence rates of multidrug-resistant organisms. It appears to be of importance for rehabilitation hospitals to be geared to the needs of patients with multidrug-resistant organisms, and prevent the transmission of these pathogens by appropriate hygiene measures.


Subject(s)
Bacterial Infections/epidemiology , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Equipment and Supplies/microbiology , Rehabilitation Centers/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Sex Distribution , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...