Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol ; 211: 105900, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33872762

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive self-testing using an objective chemical method to detect ovulation is valuable for women planning conception, practising contraception or undergoing infertility investigations or treatment. METHODS: Based on luteal phase secretion of progesterone (P4) and excretion of its major metabolite, pregnanediol glucuronide (PDG), we developed a novel direct liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LCMS) method to measure PDG and other steroid glucuronides in urine and in dried urine spots (DUS) without deconjugation or derivatization. Urine PDG by LCMS and immunoassay (P3G) and P4 by immunoassay with and without adjustment for creatinine were evaluated in daily first void urine samples from 10 women through a single menstrual cycle in which ovulation was confirmed by serial transvaginal ultrasound. RESULTS: Urine PDG with and without creatinine adjustment was stable during the follicular phase with the expected striking rise in the luteal phase peaking at 5 days after ovulation. Using a single spot urine sample (100 µL) or a DUS (<20 µL urine) and an optimal threshold to distinguish pre- from post-ovulatory samples, in ROC analysis urine PDG adjusted for creatinine accurately identified ovulation in 92 % of samples was comparable with P3G immunoassay and superior to urine P4 with or without adjustment for creatinine. Extending the analysis to two or three consecutive daily samples reduced the false negative rate from 8% to 2.6 % for two and 1.9 % for three urine samples. CONCLUSIONS: This method holds promise as a non-invasive self-test method for women to determine by an objective chemical method their ovulatory status.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers/urine , Menstrual Cycle , Ovulation Detection/methods , Ovulation , Pregnanediol/analogs & derivatives , Urinalysis/methods , Chromatography, Liquid , Female , Humans , Mass Spectrometry , Pregnanediol/urine
2.
J AOAC Int ; 101(2): 468-479, 2018 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28851479

ABSTRACT

Paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs) in bivalve molluscs represent a public health risk and are controlled via compliance with a regulatory limit of 0.8 mg saxitoxin (STX)⋅2HCl equivalents per kilogram of shellfish meat (eq/kg). Shellfish industries would benefit from the use of rapid immunological screening tests for PSTs to be used for regulation, but to date none have been fully validated. An interlaboratory study involving 16 laboratories was performed to determine the suitability of the Neogen test to detect PSTs in mussels and oysters. Participants performed the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer and a modified protocol with a conversion step to improve detection of gonyautoxin 1&4. The statistical analysis showed that the protocols had good homogeneity across all laboratories, with satisfactory repeatability, laboratory, and reproducibility variation near the regulatory level. The mean probability of detection (POD) at 0.8 mg STX⋅2HCl eq/kg using the standard protocol in mussels and oysters was 0.966 and 0.997, respectively, and 0.968 and 0.966 using the modified protocol. The estimated LOD in mussels was 0.316 mg STX⋅2HCl eq/kg with the standard and 0.682 mg STX⋅2HCl eq/kg with the modified protocol, and 0.710 and 0.734 mg STX⋅2HCl eq/kg for oysters, respectively. The Neogen test may be acceptable for regulatory purposes for oysters in accordance with European Commission directives in which the standard protocol provides, at the regulatory level, a probability of a negative response of 0.033 on 95% of occasions. Its use for mussels is less consistent at the regulatory level due to the wide prediction interval around the POD.


Subject(s)
Marine Toxins/analysis , Saxitoxin/analogs & derivatives , Animals , Crassostrea/chemistry , Dinoflagellida , Immunoassay/methods , Limit of Detection , Marine Toxins/immunology , Marine Toxins/isolation & purification , Mytilus/chemistry , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , Saxitoxin/analysis , Saxitoxin/immunology , Saxitoxin/isolation & purification
3.
J Food Prot ; 77(11): 1960-7, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25364931

ABSTRACT

The first national survey of Australian wild-caught abalone was conducted between September 2012 and December 2013. The aim of the survey was to determine the presence of paralytic shellfish toxins (PSTs), amnesic shellfish toxins (ASTs), and diarrhetic shellfish toxins (DSTs) in wild-caught abalone at levels above the current Codex marine biotoxin limits during the 2013 fishing season. Abalone (n = 190) were collected from 68 abalone-fishing blocks for which the combined annual harvest accounts for 80 % of Australian production. Concurrent seawater samples were collected and enumerated for potentially toxic phytoplankton. The foot and viscera tissues of each abalone sample were analyzed separately for PSTs, ASTs, and DSTs. No samples (abalone foot or viscera) contained toxins at levels exceeding the marine biotoxin limits stipulated by Codex. The resulting prevalence estimate suggests that less than 1.6 % of the commercially caught wild abalone population in Australia were contaminated with marine biotoxins at levels above the regulatory limit during the survey period. ASTs were detected at very low (trace) levels in the foot and viscera tissue of four and three abalone samples, respectively. To our knowledge, this represents the first reported detection of domoic acid in Australian abalone. PSTs also were detected at very low levels in 17 samples of abalone foot tissue and 6 samples of abalone viscera. The association between the low levels of ASTs and PSTs detected in abalone and the presence of potential toxin-producing phytoplankton in seawater samples was weak. DSTs were not detected in any abalone despite the detection of very low levels of DST-producing phytoplankton in a small number (9 of 77) of seawater samples. The results of this survey should be useful for public health risk assessments and provide additional evidence that the prevalence of marine biotoxins in Australian wild-caught abalone is very low.


Subject(s)
Food Contamination/analysis , Gastropoda/chemistry , Marine Toxins/analysis , Shellfish/analysis , Animals , Australia , Food Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Gastropoda/metabolism , Marine Toxins/metabolism , Seawater/analysis
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL