Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Comput Assist Tomogr ; 42(2): 299-305, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29189396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether machine learning can accurately classify human papillomavirus (HPV) status of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) using computed tomography (CT)-based texture analysis. METHODS: Texture analyses were retrospectively applied to regions of interest from OPSCC primary tumors on contrast-enhanced neck CT, and machine learning was used to create a model that classified HPV status with the highest accuracy. Results were compared against the blinded review of 2 neuroradiologists. RESULTS: The HPV-positive (n = 92) and -negative (n = 15) cohorts were well matched clinically. Neuroradiologist classification accuracies for HPV status (44.9%, 55.1%) were not significantly different (P = 0.13), and there was a lack of agreement between the 2 neuroradiologists (κ = -0.145). The best machine learning model had an accuracy of 75.7%, which was greater than either neuroradiologist (P < 0.001, P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Useful diagnostic information regarding HPV infection can be extracted from the CT appearance of OPSCC beyond what is apparent to the trained human eye.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/complications , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/complications , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnostic imaging , Contrast Media , Female , Humans , Machine Learning , Male , Middle Aged , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Oropharynx/diagnostic imaging , Oropharynx/virology , Papillomaviridae , Papillomavirus Infections/complications , Radiographic Image Enhancement , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies
2.
Neuro Oncol ; 19(1): 128-137, 2017 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27502248

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma (GBM) exhibits profound intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Each tumor comprises multiple genetically distinct clonal populations with different therapeutic sensitivities. This has implications for targeted therapy and genetically informed paradigms. Contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI and conventional sampling techniques have failed to resolve this heterogeneity, particularly for nonenhancing tumor populations. This study explores the feasibility of using multiparametric MRI and texture analysis to characterize regional genetic heterogeneity throughout MRI-enhancing and nonenhancing tumor segments. METHODS: We collected multiple image-guided biopsies from primary GBM patients throughout regions of enhancement (ENH) and nonenhancing parenchyma (so called brain-around-tumor, [BAT]). For each biopsy, we analyzed DNA copy number variants for core GBM driver genes reported by The Cancer Genome Atlas. We co-registered biopsy locations with MRI and texture maps to correlate regional genetic status with spatially matched imaging measurements. We also built multivariate predictive decision-tree models for each GBM driver gene and validated accuracies using leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV). RESULTS: We collected 48 biopsies (13 tumors) and identified significant imaging correlations (univariate analysis) for 6 driver genes: EGFR, PDGFRA, PTEN, CDKN2A, RB1, and TP53. Predictive model accuracies (on LOOCV) varied by driver gene of interest. Highest accuracies were observed for PDGFRA (77.1%), EGFR (75%), CDKN2A (87.5%), and RB1 (87.5%), while lowest accuracy was observed in TP53 (37.5%). Models for 4 driver genes (EGFR, RB1, CDKN2A, and PTEN) showed higher accuracy in BAT samples (n = 16) compared with those from ENH segments (n = 32). CONCLUSION: MRI and texture analysis can help characterize regional genetic heterogeneity, which offers potential diagnostic value under the paradigm of individualized oncology.


Subject(s)
Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , DNA Copy Number Variations/genetics , Genomics/methods , Glioblastoma/genetics , Glioblastoma/pathology , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Feasibility Studies , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Neoplasm Staging , Prognosis
3.
PLoS One ; 10(11): e0141506, 2015.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26599106

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Genetic profiling represents the future of neuro-oncology but suffers from inadequate biopsies in heterogeneous tumors like Glioblastoma (GBM). Contrast-enhanced MRI (CE-MRI) targets enhancing core (ENH) but yields adequate tumor in only ~60% of cases. Further, CE-MRI poorly localizes infiltrative tumor within surrounding non-enhancing parenchyma, or brain-around-tumor (BAT), despite the importance of characterizing this tumor segment, which universally recurs. In this study, we use multiple texture analysis and machine learning (ML) algorithms to analyze multi-parametric MRI, and produce new images indicating tumor-rich targets in GBM. METHODS: We recruited primary GBM patients undergoing image-guided biopsies and acquired pre-operative MRI: CE-MRI, Dynamic-Susceptibility-weighted-Contrast-enhanced-MRI, and Diffusion Tensor Imaging. Following image coregistration and region of interest placement at biopsy locations, we compared MRI metrics and regional texture with histologic diagnoses of high- vs low-tumor content (≥80% vs <80% tumor nuclei) for corresponding samples. In a training set, we used three texture analysis algorithms and three ML methods to identify MRI-texture features that optimized model accuracy to distinguish tumor content. We confirmed model accuracy in a separate validation set. RESULTS: We collected 82 biopsies from 18 GBMs throughout ENH and BAT. The MRI-based model achieved 85% cross-validated accuracy to diagnose high- vs low-tumor in the training set (60 biopsies, 11 patients). The model achieved 81.8% accuracy in the validation set (22 biopsies, 7 patients). CONCLUSION: Multi-parametric MRI and texture analysis can help characterize and visualize GBM's spatial histologic heterogeneity to identify regional tumor-rich biopsy targets.


Subject(s)
Glioblastoma/diagnostic imaging , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Algorithms , Contrast Media/administration & dosage , Diffusion Tensor Imaging/methods , Glioblastoma/pathology , Humans , Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted , Machine Learning , Radiography
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...