A Combined Model Integrating Radiomics and Deep Learning Based on Contrast-Enhanced CT for Preoperative Staging of Laryngeal Carcinoma.

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Accurate staging of laryngeal carcinoma can inform appropriate treatment decision-making. We developed a radiomics model, a deep learning (DL) model, and a combined model (incorporating radiomics features and DL features) based on the venous-phase CT images and explored the performance of these models in stratifying patients with laryngeal carcinoma into stage I-II and stage III-IV, and also compared these models with radiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three hundreds and nineteen patients with pathologically confirmed laryngeal carcinoma were randomly divided into a training set (n = 223) and a test set (n = 96). In the training set, the radiomics features with inter- and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs)> 0.75 were screened by Spearman correlation analysis and recursive feature elimination (RFE); then support vector machine (SVM) classifier was applied to develop the radiomics model. The DL model was built using ResNet 18 by the cropped 2D regions of interest (ROIs) in the maximum tumor ROI slices and the last fully connected layer of this network served as the DL feature extractor. Finally, a combined model was developed by pooling the radiomics features and extracted DL features to predict the staging. RESULTS: The area under the curves (AUCs) for radiomics model, DL model, and combined model in the test set were 0.704 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.588-0.820), 0.724 (95% CI: 0.613-0.835), and 0.849 (95% CI: 0.755-0.943), respectively. The combined model outperformed the radiomics model and the DL model in discriminating stage I-II from stage III-IV (p = 0.031 and p = 0.020, respectively). Only the combined model performed significantly better than radiologists (p < 0.050 for both). CONCLUSION: The combined model can help tailor the therapeutic strategy for laryngeal carcinoma patients by enabling more accurate preoperative staging.

CT based intratumor and peritumoral radiomics for differentiating complete from incomplete capsular characteristics of parotid pleomorphic adenoma: a two-center study.

OBJECTIVE: Capsular characteristics of pleomorphic adenoma (PA) has various forms. Patients without complete capsule has a higher risk of recurrence than patients with complete capsule. We aimed to develop and validate CT-based intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics models to make a differential diagnosis between parotid PA with and without complete capsule. METHODS: Data of 260 patients (166 patients with PA from institution 1 (training set) and 94 patients (test set) from institution 2) were retrospectively analyzed. Three Volume of interest (VOIs) were defined in the CT images of each patient: tumor volume of interest (VOItumor), VOIperitumor, and VOIintra-plus peritumor. Radiomics features were extracted from each VOI and used to train nine different machine learning algorithms. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the area under the curve (AUC). RESULTS: The results showed that the radiomics models based on features from VOIintra-plus peritumor achieved higher AUCs compared to models based on features from VOItumor. The best performing model was Linear discriminant analysis, which achieved an AUC of 0.86 in the tenfold cross-validation and 0.869 in the test set. The model was based on 15 features, including shape-based features and texture features. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the feasibility of combining artificial intelligence with CT-based peritumoral radiomics features can be used to accurately predict capsular characteristics of parotid PA. This may assist in clinical decision-making by preoperative identification of capsular characteristics of parotid PA.

Deep learning-assisted diagnosis of benign and malignant parotid tumors based on contrast-enhanced CT: a multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES: To develop deep learning-assisted diagnosis models based on CT images to facilitate radiologists in differentiating benign and malignant parotid tumors. METHODS: Data from 573 patients with histopathologically confirmed parotid tumors from center 1 (training set: n = 269; internal-testing set: n = 116) and center 2 (external-testing set: n = 188) were retrospectively collected. Six deep learning models (MobileNet V3, ShuffleNet V2, Inception V3, DenseNet 121, ResNet 50, and VGG 19) based on arterial-phase CT images, and a baseline support vector machine (SVM) model integrating clinical-radiological features with handcrafted radiomics signatures were constructed. The performance of senior and junior radiologists with and without optimal model assistance was compared. The net reclassification index (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to evaluate the clinical benefit of using the optimal model. RESULTS: MobileNet V3 had the best predictive performance, with sensitivity increases of 0.111 and 0.207 (p < 0.05) in the internal- and external-testing sets, respectively, relative to the SVM model. Clinical benefit and overall efficiency of junior radiologist were significantly improved with model assistance; for the internal- and external-testing sets, respectively, the AUCs improved by 0.128 and 0.102 (p < 0.05), the sensitivity improved by 0.194 and 0.120 (p < 0.05), the NRIs were 0.257 and 0.205 (p < 0.001), and the IDIs were 0.316 and 0.252 (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The developed deep learning models can assist radiologists in achieving higher diagnostic performance and hopefully provide more valuable information for clinical decision-making in patients with parotid tumors. KEY POINTS: • The developed deep learning models outperformed the traditional SVM model in predicting benign and malignant parotid tumors. • Junior radiologist can obtain greater clinical benefits with assistance from the optimal deep learning model. • The clinical decision-making process can be accelerated in patients with parotid tumors using the established deep learning model.

The Effect of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based Radiomics Models in Discriminating stage I-II and III-IVa Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a common tumor in China. Accurate stages of NPC are crucial for treatment. We therefore aim to develop radiomics models for discriminating early-stage (I-II) and advanced-stage (III-IVa) NPC based on MR images. METHODS: 329 NPC patients were enrolled and randomly divided into a training cohort (n = 229) and a validation cohort (n = 100). Features were extracted based on axial contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images (CE-T1WI), T1WI, and T2-weighted images (T2WI). Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to build radiomics signatures. Seven radiomics models were constructed with logistic regression. The AUC value was used to assess classification performance. The DeLong test was used to compare the AUCs of different radiomics models and visual assessment. RESULTS: Models A, B, C, D, E, F, and G were constructed with 13, 9, 7, 9, 10, 7, and 6 features, respectively. All radiomics models showed better classification performance than that of visual assessment. Model A (CE-T1WI + T1WI + T2WI) showed the best classification performance (AUC: 0.847) in the training cohort. CE-T1WI showed the greatest significance for staging NPC. CONCLUSION: Radiomics models can effectively distinguish early-stage from advanced-stage NPC patients, and Model A (CE-T1WI + T1WI + T2WI) showed the best classification performance.

Multiphasic CT-Based Radiomics Analysis for the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the value of machine learning models based on clinical-radiological features and multiphasic CT radiomics features in the differentiation of benign parotid tumors (BPTs) and malignant parotid tumors (MPTs). Methods: This retrospective study included 312 patients (205 cases of BPTs and 107 cases of MPTs) who underwent multiphasic enhanced CT examinations, which were randomly divided into training (N = 218) and test (N = 94) sets. The radiomics features were extracted from the plain, arterial, and venous phases. The synthetic minority oversampling technique was used to balance minority class samples in the training set. Feature selection methods were done using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), mutual information (MI), and recursive feature extraction (RFE). Two machine learning classifiers, support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR), were then combined in pairs with three feature selection methods to build different radiomics models. Meanwhile, the prediction performances of different radiomics models based on single phase (plain, arterial, and venous phase) and multiphase (three-phase combination) were compared to determine which model construction method and phase were more discriminative. In addition, clinical models based on clinical-radiological features and combined models integrating radiomics features and clinical-radiological features were established. The prediction performances of the different models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and the drawing of calibration curves. Results: Among the 24 established radiomics models composed of four different phases, three feature selection methods, and two machine learning classifiers, the LASSO-SVM model based on a three-phase combination had the optimal prediction performance with AUC (0.936 [95% CI = 0.866, 0.976]), sensitivity (0.78), specificity (0.90), and accuracy (0.86) in the test set, and its prediction performance was significantly better than with the clinical model based on LR (AUC = 0.781, p = 0.012). In the test set, the combined model based on LR had a lower AUC than the optimal radiomics model (AUC = 0.933 vs. 0.936), but no statistically significant difference (p = 0.888). Conclusion: Multiphasic CT-based radiomics analysis showed a machine learning model based on clinical-radiological features and radiomics features has the potential to provide a valuable tool for discriminating benign from malignant parotid tumors.