Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Orthop Trauma ; 37(7): 346-350, 2023 07 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36821474

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report the results of retrograde intramedullary nailing (RIMN) for the treatment of extremely proximal femur fractures. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: 63 patients with femoral shaft fractures involving the anatomic region within 10 centimeters of the inferior border of the lesser trochanter, which were treated with retrograde intramedullary nailing. INTERVENTION: Retrograde intramedullary femoral nail. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time to union, nonunion, malunion, and unplanned reoperation. RESULTS: Between 2009 and 2020, 63 fractures were followed up to fracture union, reoperation, or a minimum of 1 year clinically. The mean follow-up was 32 months, and 48 (76%) of the patients were followed up beyond 1 year clinically. The mean patient age was 34 years (range 18-84 years), and the mean BMI was 27 (range 14-45) kg/m 2 . Forty (64%) patients were polytraumatized. Clinical and radiographic union was achieved in 59 (94%) fractures after index operation at a mean time to union of 22 weeks (range 9-51 weeks). Delayed union requiring nail dynamization occurred in 1 (2%) instance. Malreduction was noted in 1 (2%) patient with a 12-degree flexion deformity that resulted in nonunion. In total, there were 3 (5%) nonunions requiring revision surgery, 1 treated with retrograde exchange nailing and 2 revised to cephalomedullary nails; all were united after revision. CONCLUSIONS: Retrograde intramedullary nailing can be an effective treatment strategy for extremely proximal femur fractures when necessary. Our series demonstrated a high rate of union and a low rate of malalignment and complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Proximal Femoral Fractures , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Retrospective Studies , Bone Nails , Fracture Healing , Femur/surgery , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Treatment Outcome
2.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 32(8): 1577-1582, 2022 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34623470

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Retrograde intramedullary nailing of intra-articular distal femur fractures with metaphyseal and/or epiphyseal comminution is controversial and considered a contraindication to nailing. The purpose of this study was to report union rate, complications, and secondary procedures after open reduction and retrograde intramedullary nailing of comminuted, intra-articular, distal femur fractures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review performed at an urban level one trauma center identified 16 patients AO/Orthopedic Trauma Association (OTA) 33-C2 and 33-C3 femur fractures treated with open reduction, lag screws, and retrograde intramedullary nail fixation. Radiographic union, complications, secondary operations were reviewed. RESULTS: At the 3-month follow-up 12 (86%) of the 14 patients with radiographs had healed. At last follow-up, all 16 femur fractures achieved radiographic union after the index procedure. No patient required a revision procedure for delayed union or nonunion. Complications occurred in 6 (38%) patients, including failed distal interlocking screws (n = 2), knee arthrofibrosis (n = 3), superficial wound infection (n = 1), and wound dehiscence (n = 1). Three (19%) patients required secondary procedures, which included knee manipulation under anesthesia (n = 3), distal interlocking screw removal (n = 2), and closure of a wound dehiscence (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: Comminuted intra-articular distal femur fractures that can be successfully treated with retrograde IMN fixation will reliably go on to union with a complication rate that is favorable to that reported for plate fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case-series.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Comminuted , Humans , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary/methods , Retrospective Studies , Fractures, Comminuted/diagnostic imaging , Fractures, Comminuted/surgery , Femoral Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Postoperative Complications , Femur/diagnostic imaging , Femur/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Bone Nails
3.
J Clin Orthop Trauma ; 17: 94-98, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33738237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The standard proximal interlocking screw (SS) configuration for antegrade intramedullary nail (IMN) fixation of femoral shaft fractures is lateral to medial or from the greater to less trochanter. Some authors argue for the routine use of the reconstruction screw (RS) configuration (oriented up the femoral neck) instead to prevent femoral neck complications. The purpose of this study was to compare a matched cohort of patients receiving these screw configurations and subsequent complications. METHODS: A retrospective review of two urban level-one trauma centers identified adults with isolated femoral shaft fractures undergoing antegrade IMN. Patients with RS and SS configurations were matched 1:1 by age, sex, fracture location, and AO classification in order to compare complications. RESULTS: 130 patients with femoral shaft fractures were identified. SS and RS configurations were used in 83 (64%) and 47 (36%) patients. 30 patients from each group were able to be matched for analysis. The RS and SS group did not differ in age, fracture location, AO classification, operative time, or number of distal interlocking screws. The RS group had fewer open fractures and were more likely to have two proximal screws. There were 7 complications, including 5 nonunions and 2 delayed unions, with no detectable difference between RS vs. SS groups (10% vs 13%, Proportional difference -3%, 95% confidence interval (CI) -30 to 14%, p = 0.1). There were no femoral neck complications in the entire cohort of 130 patients. On multivariate analysis none of the variables analyzed were independently associated with the development of complications. CONCLUSIONS: In this matched cohort of patients with femoral shaft fractures undergoing antegrade IMN fixation, RS and SS configurations were associated with a similar number of complications and no femoral neck complications. The SS configuration remains the standard for antegrade IMN femoral shaft fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

5.
Orthop Clin North Am ; 50(2): 171-179, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30850076

ABSTRACT

Active assessment and management of hypovitaminosis D among orthopedic patients is low-risk and low-cost while retaining significant potential to improve patient care. Vitamin D has an established role in musculoskeletal development and calcium homeostasis, and vitamin D deficiency is pervasive in orthopedic trauma populations. Clinical guidelines for screening and supplementation for hypovitaminosis D are lacking. Literature on the effects of vitamin K on bone health is limited. Anabolic hormone analogues may have a future role in delayed union or nonunion treatment. Vitamin D deficiency and other endocrine abnormalities should be considered in orthopedic trauma patients presenting with fracture nonunion of uncertain cause.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Ununited/etiology , Fractures, Ununited/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal System/drug effects , Vitamin D Deficiency/epidemiology , Vitamin D/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Anabolic Agents/adverse effects , Antifibrinolytic Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Density Conservation Agents/therapeutic use , Calcium/administration & dosage , Calcium/therapeutic use , Diagnostic Screening Programs/standards , Female , Fractures, Ununited/physiopathology , Homeostasis/physiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome , Vitamin D/therapeutic use , Vitamin D Deficiency/etiology , Vitamin D Deficiency/prevention & control , Vitamin K/administration & dosage , Vitamin K/therapeutic use
6.
Hand (N Y) ; : 1558944717710765, 2017 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28608716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Smartphone-based thermal imaging (SBTI) allows noninvasive temperature measurements. Its validity compared with a conventional infrared probe temperature scanner (IPTS) has not been studied. This study compares temperature measurements between the 2 technologies on human participants. METHODS: Bilateral index finger temperature measurements were obtained on 30 healthy participants using IPTS and SBTI devices. Dominant versus nondominant sides (side-to-side difference) and individual side measurements between the 2 methods were compared for repeatability (precision) and agreement. RESULTS: A total of 23 female and 7 male participants were tested. Based on nonoverlapping confidence intervals (CIs), intraclass correlation coefficient of repeatability was higher for SBTI than for IPTS measurements in side-to-side differences: 0.97 (95% CI, 0.96-0.99) versus 0.89 (95% CI, 0.82-0.95). The SBTI method recorded higher side-to-side difference and individual side measurements: 0.56°C (limits of agreement [LOA], -1.09°C to 2.20°C) and 2.64°C (LOA, 0.96°C-4.32°C), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to higher precision, SBTI offers added benefits of instantaneous acquisition of the temperature map of the entire hand, allowing quick comparisons of the uninjured and injured fingers. SBTI measurements consistently yielded higher temperature readings in the side-to-side difference as well as individual measurements. This suggested that both devices are not interchangeable for absolute temperature comparisons but are interchangeable in monitoring the changes in temperatures. This study suggests the potential for SBTI devices to be used in the clinical settings and may be of special benefit in telemedicine.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL