Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Operable Breast Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis of Real-World Use.

BACKGROUND: A retrospective study of the real-world use of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NET) is important for standardizing the role of NET in breast cancer care. METHODS: In a consecutive series of women with operable breast cancer who received NET for ≥28 days, associations of NET objectives, NET outcomes, adjuvant chemotherapy use after NET, and survival with clinicopathological factors were examined. RESULTS: NET objectives were reduction in surgical extent in 49 patients, avoidance of surgery in 31, and treatment until scheduled surgery in 8. The mean duration of NET was 349.5 (range, 34-1,923), 869.8 (range, 36-4,859), and 55.8 (range, 39-113) days, respectively, in these cohorts (success rate: 79.6%, 64.5%, and 100%, respectively), and the differences were significant. Among patients in the former two cohorts, progression-free survival was significantly better in patients with stage 0 or I disease, ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive ductal carcinoma, ≥71% estrogen receptor (ER) positivity, and the surgical extent reduction cohort than the other counterparts. Postoperative chemotherapy use was significantly associated with lymph node metastasis, a high Ki67 labeling index, lymphovascular invasion, and a high preoperative endocrine prognostic index at the time of surgery after NET. Better recurrence-free survival after surgery was significantly associated with high ER expression after NET or high progesterone receptor expression before or after NET. CONCLUSIONS: NET can help reduce surgical extent or avoid surgery in women with early breast cancer, ductal carcinoma, or high ER expression. NET may also aid in decisions related to postoperative systemic therapy to improve survival.

Optimal Treatment Duration of Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy for Women Aged 60 Years or Older with Estrogen Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Invasive Breast Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy is not the standard of care for breast cancer, primarily because the optimal treatment duration remains unclear. This phase 2 prospective multicenter study analyzed time to progression, time to maximal response, and time to treatment failure for neoadjuvant exemestane. METHODS: Inclusion criteria were women aged ≥60 years with Stage II or III breast cancer classified as estrogen receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative. Response was defined as a ≥10% and minimum of 3 mm decrease in tumor size, as compared with the most recent or smallest value, and no new lesion. Progression was defined as a >10% and minimum of over 3 mm increase in tumor size, as compared with the most recent or smallest value, or a new lesion. Maximal response was defined as the final recorded response. RESULTS: This study included 24 women, most of whom had T2 N0 tumors with high estrogen receptor expression. We initially observed a response in 23 patients (96%); however, 6 patients (25%) later experienced progression. Time to progression, time to maximal response, and time to treatment failure ranged from 7 to 22 months (estimated median, 35), 1 to 22 months (estimated median, 10), and 2 to 22 months (estimated median, 22), respectively. Treatment duration varied widely, but the estimated optimal duration of neoadjuvant exemestane therapy was 22 to 35 months in patients seeking to avoid surgery and 10 months in patients wishing to receive breast-conserving surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant exemestane therapy is long effective for older women with hormone-sensitive breast cancer.

Transudative chylothorax associated with alcoholic cirrhosis.

We present the case of a 53-year-old man with decompensated alcoholic cirrhosis who was referred for right pleural effusion. After investigation, the patient was ultimately diagnosed with cirrhotic chylothorax. Chylothorax is a rare manifestation of cirrhosis, which results from the trans-diaphragmatic passage of chylous ascites. While chylothorax generally results in an exudative pleural effusion, cirrhotic chylothorax is always a transudative effusion. Biochemical characteristics are useful for diagnosis, avoiding potentially harmful diagnostic and therapeutic procedures.

Correction to: Eribulin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a phase II, multicenter, collaborative, open-label, single-arm clinical trial.

The authors would like to note the replacement of Fig. 2b, for which Fig. 2a was placed erringly, with appropriate Fig. 2b.

Changing clinical and molecular characteristics of hepatitis E virus infection in Mie Prefecture, Japan: Disappearance of indigenous subtype 3e strains.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical and molecular characteristics of hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection in Mie Prefecture, Japan, from 2004 through 2018. METHODS: The clinical information of hepatitis E cases was collected from 21 medical institutions in Mie Prefecture. The nucleotide sequences of infecting HEV strains were determined for cases with available serum samples. The origins or transmission routes were inferred from phylogenetic analyses of the nucleotide sequences. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were diagnosed with HEV infection. The number of cases increased each year through 2012 and then decreased. Analyses of the clinical characteristics of the cases indicated that even mild cases were detected in the latter 10 years of the study. Nucleotide sequence analyses were undertaken on 38 of the 53 cases. The HEV subtype 3e (HEV-3e) strains identified for 13 cases were closely related to a swine HEV-3e strain that was isolated from the liver of a pig bred in Mie Prefecture. The number of cases infected with the indigenous Mie HEV-3e strains increased until 2012 but have not been reported since 2014. In the latter half of the study, cases involving various HEV strains of different genotypes and subtypes emerged. CONCLUSIONS: The disappearance of indigenous Mie HEV-3e strains appeared to be the primary cause for the decrease in hepatitis E cases in Mie Prefecture. The disappearance might have been associated with improved hygienic conditions on pig farms or the closure of contaminated farms. The results suggest that indigenous HEV strains can be eradicated by appropriate management.

Eribulin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a phase II, multicenter, collaborative, open-label, single-arm clinical trial.

Purpose To examine the efficacy and safety of triple therapy with eribulin, trastuzumab, and pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) who never received any prior therapy in the first-line metastatic/advanced setting. Methods Eribulin 1.4 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8), trastuzumab 8 mg/kg over 90 min and 6 mg/kg over 30 min, and pertuzumab 840 mg/body over 60 min and 420 mg/body over 30 min were administered intravenously in 21-day cycles. Results 25 women (median age, 57 years [range, 41-75 years]) received a median of 10 cycles (range, 0-34 cycles); 24 had performance status (PS) 0, 1 PS 1, 8 stage IV breast cancer, and 17 recurrence. Lung and liver metastases occurred in 9 and 9 patients, respectively. Median time to treatment failure with eribulin was 9.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-13.9 months), and median progression-free survival was 23.1 months (95% CI, 14.4-31.8 months). The overall response rate (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) was 80.0% (95% CI, 59.3-93.2%), and the clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + stable disease ≥24 weeks) was 84.0% (95% CI, 63.9-95.5%). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were alopecia (92.0%), fatigue (68.0%), and sensory peripheral neuropathy (60.0%). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 11 patients (44.0%). The only grade 4 TEAE was neutrophil count decreased (16.0%). Neither grade 4 peripheral neuropathy nor febrile neutropenia occurred. Conclusions ETP therapy showed acceptable efficacy and safety and is a potential first-line therapy for patients with HER2-positive MBC.

Induction therapy with paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by switch maintenance therapy with eribulin in Japanese patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: a multicenter, collaborative, open-label, phase II clinical study for the SBCCSG 35 investigators.

BACKGROUND: To examine the efficacy and safety of induction therapy with paclitaxel and bevacizumab followed by switch maintenance therapy with eribulin (ISMT) in Japanese patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). METHODS: Patients, who had previously undergone a maximum of 2 regimens of chemotherapy, received 3 cycles of induction therapy with paclitaxel (90 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 followed by 1-week drug holiday) and bevacizumab (10 mg/kg intravenously after the completion of paclitaxel administration on days 1 and 15). Patients who had complete response, partial response, or stable disease underwent switch maintenance therapy with eribulin (1.4 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 followed by 1-week drug holiday). The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF) for ISMT. RESULTS: Fifty-one eligible patients (median age: 66 years; range: 35-74) were enrolled: 19 (37.3%) and 32 (62.7%) had stage IV and recurrence, respectively, 42 (82.4%) had visceral metastases, and 45 (88.2%) received eribulin-38 of whom showed disease progression, and 40 (78.4%) underwent post therapy. Median TTF was 9.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.3-11.1), median progression-free survival was 10.7 months (95% CI: 9.6-11.8), and median overall survival was 20.0 months (95% CI: 16.0-24.0). Relative dose intensity was 97.7% (range: 33.3-100.0) for induction therapy and was 83.3% (range: 49.3-100.6%) for eribulin maintenance therapy. The most common adverse event was alopecia (51 [100%]) in induction therapy and was peripheral sensory neuropathy (37 [82.2%]) in eribulin maintenance therapy. Eribulin was effective with manageable tolerability. CONCLUSIONS: ISMT may be a promising therapeutic option for patients with MBC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN000015971 . Registration date: January 1, 2015.

A Real-World Retrospective Cohort Study of Combined Therapy with Bevacizumab and Paclitaxel in Japanese Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Combined therapy with bevacizumab and paclitaxel (BP regimen) as a first-line treatment has proven highly effective with good tolerance for patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of the BP regimen for Japanese patients with MBC in real-world clinical settings. METHODS: From June 2012 through May 2014, we recruited 94 patients at 10 medical institutions. The primary endpoint was time to treatment failure (TTF), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Objective response was assessed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0-Japan Clinical Oncology Group. RESULTS: Nighty patients with MBC (mean 58 years, range: 34-80 years) were enrolled, and 60 (66.6%) and 52 (57.7%) had undergone prior chemotherapy as adjuvant treatment and treatment for MBC, respectively. Median TTF was 6.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.2-8.3 months), and median OS was 15.4 months (95% CI, 12.0-18.9 months). The overall response rate was 67.8% (95% CI: 57.1-77.2%). A total of 28 patients (31.1%) required a dose reduction of paclitaxel. Forty-five, 42, and 3 patients received the initial doses of 90, 80, and 60 mg/m2, respectively. Among patients who received the initial doses of 90 mg/m2, 13 patients (28.9%) unexpectedly required a dose reduction of ≥20 mg/m2. The BP regimen was discontinued for 66 (73.3%) of the 90 patients, 52 (57.7%) of whom experienced "disease progression." Grade 3/4 hematologic AEs developed in 51 patients (56.6%), with leukopenia and neutropenia in 16 patients (17.8%) and 21 patients (23.3%), respectively. Grade 3 nonhematologic AEs developed in 8 patients (8.9%), with the most common nonhematologic AE of peripheral neuropathy in 4 patients (4.4%). No Grade 4 nonhematologic AEs developed. Peripheral neuropathy [56 patients (62.2%) ], nail discoloration [53 patients (58.9%) ], and fatigue [51 patients (56.7%) ] were the most predominant AEs-the known AEs of paclitaxel. CONCLUSIONS: The BP regimen was active and well tolerated in the real-world clinical settings. As many as 28.9% of patients who received the initial dose of 90 mg/m2 required a dose reduction of paclitaxel by 20 mg/m2. Therefore, there is a need to find a therapeutic regimen that is less likely to result in dose reductions for patients with MBC who undergo a BP regimen using the initial paclitaxel dose of 90 mg/m2.

Hepatotoxicity induced by trastuzumab used for breast cancer adjuvant therapy: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: Trastuzumab is generally considered a highly safe drug, but there have been cases of infusion reaction and cardiotoxicity. This report will present a rare case of hepatotoxicity induced by trastuzumab used for adjuvant therapy of human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-positive breast cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 60-year-old Japanese postmenopausal woman with a non-contributory past medical history. She presented for detailed examination of an abnormality in her left breast. She had left breast cancer (T2N1M0, stage IIB) that was positive for estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and was human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 3+. She began receiving epirubicin and cyclophosphamide therapy but developed hepatotoxicity (aspartate aminotransferase 43 U/L, alanine aminotransferase 104 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 634 U/L, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase 383 U/L). Thus, the therapy was discontinued after two cycles, and a weekly paclitaxel therapy was begun. After the absence of an adverse event was confirmed, she also began receiving trastuzumab (4 mg/kg) at the second cycle. However, hepatotoxicity (aspartate aminotransferase 267 U/L, alanine aminotransferase 246 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 553 U/L, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase 240 U/L) developed again, and trastuzumab was discontinued. She received paclitaxel monotherapy for a total of four cycles and subsequently underwent partial mastectomy and axillary dissection. After completing adjuvant radiation therapy (breast, 50 Gy), she received trastuzumab administration (4 mg/kg) but hepatotoxicity (aspartate aminotransferase 47 U/L, alanine aminotransferase 102 U/L, alkaline phosphatase 377 U/L, and γ-glutamyl transpeptidase 91 U/L) recurred. Thus, it was discontinued again. There was no hepatitis B or C virus infection, and a drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test revealed a positive reaction to trastuzumab (stimulation index: 227%). Thereafter she has used only oral letrozole (2.5mg/day) and no recurrent cancer has been observed. CONCLUSIONS: Although trastuzumab is a highly safe drug, one must be mindful of its risk for hepatotoxicity. Periodic monitoring of liver functions is necessary during trastuzumab therapy.

Efficacy of high-dose toremifene therapy in postmenopausal patients with metastatic breast cancer resistant to aromatase inhibitors:a retrospective, single-institution study.

BACKGROUND: Aromatase inhibitors(AI)have established efficacy as first-line therapy in postmenopausal patients with hormone-sensitive metastatic breast cancer(MBC). However,the use of endocrine therapy has not yet been established for second-line and later therapy. Our study examined the efficacy of high-dose toremifene therapy(HD-TOR)in patients with MBC resistant to AIs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was carried out to determine outcomes in 85 postmenopausal patients with MBC resistant to AIs who began HD-TOR between May 2001 and October 2011. The patients received toremifene 120 mg once daily on consecutive days. RESULTS: The objective response rate(ORR)was 21.2%,the clinical benefit rate(CBR)was 41.2%,and the median time to treatment failure(TTF)was 7.3 months. The CBR was high in patients with ER-positive status(p=0.045),no visceral metastasis(p=0.037),HD -TOR as first- or second-line therapy(p=0.007),no history of tamoxifen(TAM)therapy(p=0.019),and no history of chemotherapy(p=0.017). Multivariate analysis showed that ER-positive status(p=0.005, odds ratio: 0.064)and no visceral metastasis(p=0.034, odds ratio: 0.323)were independent predictors of efficacy. The TTF was significantly longer in patients with ER-positive status(p=0.019)and no history of TAM therapy(p=0.015). Multivariate analysis showed that ER-positive status(p=0.025, hazard ratio: 0.377)and no history of TAM therapy(p=0.002, hazard ratio: 0.422)were independent predictors of efficacy. No patient discontinued HDTOR therapy due to adverse events. CONCLUSION: HD-TOR is an effective endocrine therapy for patients with MBC who have failed AIs.

Locally advanced breast cancer with bleeding - two cases effectively treated with bevacizumab plus weekly paclitaxel.

Bleeding is one of the serious adverse events of bevacizumab (BV). In our report, two patients had locally advanced breast cancer with bleeding. They received BV plus weekly paclitaxel (PTX), and good local control was observed. Case 1: The patient was a 50-year-old postmenopausal woman. She had left-sided breast cancer (T4cN2cM1 [bone]-stageIV) that was negative for estrogen receptor (ER), negative for progesterone receptor(PgR), and 1+for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2). The patient began receiving different regimens of chemotherapy: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), epirubicin (EPI), and cyclophosphamide(CPA), (FEC); PTX; docetaxel (DTX); and gemcitabine (GEM) plus PTX. Subsequently, she received BV plus PTX. The tumor was markedly reduced in size at the completion of 2 cycles. Bleeding and exudate were also reduced. The patient had a partial response until the sixth cycle, and good local control was obtained. However, the patient had progressive disease at the completion of 8 cycles. Therefore, therapy was changed to capecitabine(CAP)plus CPA, but the patient died one year after she began treatment with BV plus PTX. Case 2: The patient was a 76-year-old postmenopausal woman. She had right-sided breast cancer (T4bN3bM1[lung]-stageIV) that was negative for ER, negative for PgR, and 0 for HER2. The patient began receiving different regimens of chemotherapy: EPI and CPA (EC); and PTX. Subsequently, she received BV plus PTX. The tumor was markedly reduced in size at the completion of 2 cycles. Bleeding and exudate were also reduced. The patient had a partial response until the third cycle, and good local control was obtained. However, the patient had progressive disease at the completion of 4 cycles. Therefore, therapy was changed to CAP and DTX, but the patient died six months after she began treatment with BV plus PTX.

Effectiveness and safety of tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium (TS-1) for metastatic breast cancer: a single-center retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Tegafur-gimeracil-oteracil potassium (TS-1)is a drug that is used mainly as a third-line treatment or beyond for metastatic breast cancer(MBC). However, there is still insufficient evidence on its clinical effectiveness, and there are very few reports on clinical research using TS-1 up front. In this report, we examined the effectiveness and safety of TS-1 therapy for MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The subjects were 46 patients with MBC who were treated with TS-1 between January 2005 and January 2013. These patients were retrospectively examined. RESULTS: The objective response rate to TS-1 therapy was 30.4%, clinical benefit rate (CBR)was 50.0%, and the median time to treatment failure was 10.7 months. When examined by site, the CBR was high locally (46.2%), in the lymph nodes (40.7%), in the bone (42.9%), and in the lungs and pleura (44.8%). However it was low in the liver(30.0%). The relationship was examined between clinicopathological factors and the effectiveness of TS-1 therapy. The objective response rate (ORR) was significantly higher for patients with disease-free interval (DFI) of 2 years or more (p=0.039), TS-1 therapy used as third-line treatment or earlier (p=0.022), negative HER2 status (p=0.020), and no history of capecitabine (CAP)therapy (p=0.049). The CBR was significantly higher for patients with no visceral metastasis (p=0.032), TS-1 used as third-line treatment or earlier (p=0.019), negative HER2 status (p= 0.045), no history of CAP therapy (p=0.006), and no history of tegafur-uracil/doxifluridine therapy (p=0.031). Multivariate analysis showed that DFI of 2 years or more (p=0.035, odds ratio:0.104)was an independent predictor of effectiveness assessed by ORR. There were only 4 patients in whom the treatment was discontinued due to adverse event, and TS-1 was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION: TS-1 was highly effective and well tolerated by patients with MBC. Its up-front use might enable the maintenance of satisfactory QOL and the enhancement of its clinical effectiveness.

Paclitaxel-resistant advanced recurrent breast cancer: a case of partial response due to addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel therapy: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel plus bevacizumab have shown a high response rate and prolonged progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer patients. However, overall survival was not prolonged. Thus, no conclusion has been made on the effectiveness of bevacizumab. In our report, taxane plus bevacizumab were used to treat a metastatic breast cancer patient with taxane resistance, and a good therapeutic result was obtained. CASE PRESENTATION: The patient was a 68-year-old woman with a non-contributory history. In September 2004, she underwent a pectoral muscle-conserving mastectomy with axillary dissection for right-sided breast cancer (pT3N0M0-stage IIB, estrogen receptor positive, progesterone receptor negative, and human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 negative). Adjuvant therapy consisted of 6 cycles of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin and fluorouracil, and subsequent oral anastrozole. In August 2007, the patient developed a recurrence in the left axillary lymph node. The chemotherapy was changed to high-dose toremifene, and radiation therapy was also performed. The patient achieved a complete response. In April 2009, CT showed left axillary lymph node enlargement once again and multiple lung metastases. Hormone therapy was changed to exemestane and long-term stable disease was achieved. In March 2011, the lung and left axillary lymph node metastases were enlarged and progressive disease was noted. Thus, the tumors were determined to be resistant to hormone therapy, and weekly paclitaxel was begun in May. Since partial response was achieved, this therapy was continued. In December, CT showed that lung and axillary lymph node metastases were enlarged and progressive disease was observed. Therefore, the tumors were determined to be resistant to paclitaxel. In January 2012, bevacizumab and weekly paclitaxel were begun. In April, lung and axillary lymph node metastases were reduced in size, and partial response was achieved. Thereafter the same treatment has been continued, and the patient has been followed up without clinical exacerbation as of January 2013. CONCLUSION: Taxane plus bevacizumab were used to treat a metastatic breast cancer patient with taxane resistance, and a good therapeutic result was obtained. This result is considered important in increasing treatment options for patients with taxane resistance or patients using adjuvant taxane-based therapy and in examining the effectiveness of bevacizumab in metastatic breast cancer patients.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy predicts pathological axillary lymph node status in breast cancer patients with clinically positive axillary lymph nodes at presentation.

BACKGROUND: It is still controversial whether axillary lymph node (ALN) dissection (ALND) can be omitted after negative sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) in breast cancer (BC) patients with clinically positive ALNs at presentation treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). The study aim was to analyze whether SLNB could be useful in these patients. METHODS: In a retrospective study, eligible patients were women with invasive BC with clinically positive ALNs at presentation, treated with NAC then a total or partial mastectomy, with an intraoperative histological examination of SLNs and non-SLNs suspicious for metastasis followed by ALND. Non-SLNs suspicious for metastasis were defined as hard or large nodes located in the same level of the axilla where clinically positive ALNs had been initially identified. The results of SLNB and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed for correlation with pathological ALN status. RESULTS: In a consecutive series of 105 women with 107 BC cases, 81 (75.7 %) had at least 1 SLN, and the remaining 26 (24.3 %) had at least 1 non-SLN suspicious for metastasis. The intraoperative (or final) histological examination of these nodes revealed that the false-negative (FN) rate and accuracy were 8.2 (or 6.3) % and 95.1 (or 96.3) %, respectively. Estrogen receptor status at presentation, pathological tumor response, lymphovascular invasion after NAC, and NAC regimen were correlated with pathological ALN status. CONCLUSION: The histological examination of SLNs and that of non-SLNs suspicious for metastasis are useful for predicting pathological ALN status in BC patients with clinically positive ALNs at presentation who are treated with NAC.

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: which patients would benefit and what are the advantages?

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) were more effective than tamoxifen as a neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (NAE) for postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. Neoadjuvant AIs were shown to reduce tumor volume and to allow the performance of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in cases that would normally require mastectomy. Predictive markers of neoadjuvant AIs may be ER-rich, progesterone receptor (PgR)-rich and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative tumors. However, the ability of HER2 expression to predict a response to neoadjuvant AIs is controversial. Pathological tumor size, nodal status, Ki67 level, and ER score are predictive for the survival of postmenopausal women with breast cancer who have been treated with NAE. These factors could be useful in order to select patients who do not require chemotherapy. Indeed, neoadjuvant AIs are a potential treatment option for postmenopausal women with ER-rich breast cancer who prefer BCS despite having large tumors suitable for mastectomy.

Axillary lymph node dissection can be avoided in women with breast cancer with intraoperative, false-negative sentinel lymph node biopsies.

BACKGROUND: It is currently unclear which patients with breast cancer with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases do not need axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A cohort of 1,132 women who had unilateral invasive breast cancer with clinically negative nodes or nodes suspicious for metastasis, were intraoperatively diagnosed as having negative SLNs, and did not undergo an immediate ALND. Our intraoperative histological investigation uses H&E staining of a frozen section from a maximum cut surface of each SLN. Of these 1,132 women, 132 (11.7%) were postoperatively diagnosed as having positive SLNs, which classifies them as having an intraoperative, false-negative SLN biopsy (SLNB). Patient and tumor characteristics, treatment methods, and the prognoses of these patients were investigated and compared with the remaining 1,000 patients who were negative for SLNB. RESULTS: Of the 132 patients with intraoperative, false-negative SLNB, none underwent a further ALND. With a median follow-up period of 58.1 months, none of these patients exhibited recurrence in the axillary nodes. Their recurrence-free survival rates were not statistically different from those of patients with negative SLNB. CONCLUSIONS: ALND can be avoided in most patients with breast cancer with intraoperative, false-negative SLNB.

True recurrences and new primary tumors have different clinical features in invasive breast cancer patients with ipsilateral breast tumor relapse after breast-conserving treatment.

Ipsilateral breast tumor relapse (IBTR) after breast-conserving treatment (BCT) may represent two distinct types of lesion, including a true recurrence (TR) or a new primary tumor (NPT). The aim of this study was to ascertain the difference between TRs and NPTs and to show the clinical significance of classifying IBTR into these two types of recurrence. Patients (n = 2,075) with unilateral invasive breast cancer who underwent BCT between 1987 and 2005 at Saitama Cancer Center were analyzed. IBTR was classified into TR and NPT, which was based on all clinical and pathological features of both a primary tumor and IBTR that can be evaluated. IBTR-free survival and the risk factors were analyzed in order to compare the findings for TR and NPT. In addition, the salvage surgical methods for IBTR and overall survival after IBTR were analyzed. Sixty patients with IBTR were classified into 52 with TR and eight with NPT. IBTR-free survival was significantly shorter in the patients with TR than those with NPT. Young age, tumor size, a positive surgical margin, and omission of radiation therapy (RT) were significant risk factors for TR. Omission of RT was the only significant risk factor for NPT. In 27 patients who underwent a repeat lumpectomy for TR, four had a second IBTR. The overall survival after IBTR was worse in patients with TR than NPT. TR and NPT show quite different clinical features. Classifying IBTR into TR or NPT can therefore help to select the most appropriate treatment for IBTR.

Ipsilateral breast tumor relapse after breast conserving surgery in women with breast cancer.

Ipsilateral breast tumor relapse (IBTR) is a potentially a significant problem after breast conserving surgery (BCS). With a median follow-up period of 64.7 months, IBTR occurred as a first relapse in 67 (3.0%) of a total of 2243 patients and distant recurrence occurred in 167 (7.4%). A positive surgical margin and the omission of radiotherapy (RT) were independently associated with IBTR. The five-year cumulative IBTR rates were 5.1% in patients with positive margins and 2.0% in the patients with negative margins. The five-year cumulative IBTR rates were 1.8% in patients with RT and 8.1% in patients without RT. IBTR was independently associated with distant-recurrence-free survival rates as well as age, nodal metastasis, lymphovascular invasion and progesterone receptor status. The five-year distant-recurrence-free survival rates were 81.9% in patients with IBTR and 93.2% in patients without IBTR. In order to prevent IBTR, a negative margin and the administration of RT are therefore considered to be important in patients who undergo BCS.

Positive sentinel lymph node biopsy predicts the number of metastatic axillary nodes of breast cancer.

It remains to be clarified whether a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can predict the number of metastatic axillary nodes. This study examined a consecutive series of women with unilateral invasive breast cancer who underwent axillary lymph node dissection after an intra-operative positive SLNB. The numbers of positive and negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) were analyzed for a likelihood of pN1a, pN2a, and pN3a diseases as per the UICC TNM classification. Of the 368 study patients, 165 (45%) had one positive SLN and one or more negative SLNs. This result represented the most common combination of positive and negative SLNs. It was also the most predictive indicator (93%) of pN1a disease and the least predictive indicator (7% or 0%) of pN2a or pN3a disease, respectively. The numbers of positive and negative SLNs can predict the number of metastatic axillary nodes in breast cancer patients.

Current trends of sentinel lymph node biopsy for breast cancer--a surgeon's perspective.

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is standard care for patients with early-stage breast cancer, and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) is considered unnecessary when sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are tumor-free. Additional non-SLN metastasis in patients with positive SLNs can be estimated using several risk factors such as primary tumor size, metastatic tumor size in SLNs, lymphatic vessel invasion, and so on. All patients with positive SLNs may be treated with further ALND based on their own risk for non-SLN metastasis. Recent randomized clinical trials have already proved less surgical morbidity and better QOL for SLNB alone compared with ALND. However, trials concerning the efficacy of ALND in positive SLNB patients in preventing local regional recurrence and improving overall survival compared with no ALND, and also, concerning the effectiveness of ALND compared with axillary radiation therapy (RT), have not yielded clear results. The prognostic significance of micrometastasis in SLNs or bone marrow also remains to be determined. So far SLNB is not acceptable for patients with positive nodes in the axilla at initial diagnosis even if their axillary metastases are down-staged to negative by neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although basically SLNB does not need to be performed for patients with pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), it is recommended for patients with an initial diagnosis of DCIS which is large, palpable, high grade, or found in younger patients. Because these types of DCIS have higher incidences of accompanying invasive lesions. In addition if patients will undergo mastectomy, SLNB is recommended because of the inability to perform SLNB after mastectomy. SLNB may be acceptable for patients with T3 or T4b tumors, even though SLN identification is lower yet SLN involvement is higher compared with T1 or T2 tumors, and systemic adjuvant therapy is more important for patients with T3 or T4b tumors. SLNB is a bridge to further axillary treatment such as ALND or axillary RT, and which strategy, including no further treatment, is best considered individually based on recurrence risk, treatment responsiveness and use or non-use of systemic therapy.