Police Transportation Following Vehicular Trauma and Risk of Mortality in a Resource-Limited Setting.

BACKGROUND: In resource-limited settings, prehospital trauma care and transportation from the scene to a hospital is not well developed. Critically injured patients present to the hospital via privately owned vehicles (PV), public transportation, or the police. We aimed to determine the mortality following road traffic injury based on the mode of transportation to our trauma center. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) Trauma Registry from January 2011 to May 2018. Patients with road traffic injuries, presenting from the scene, were included. Those brought in dead or discharged from casualty were excluded. Bivariate analysis was performed over mortality. A Poisson multivariate regression determined the relative risk of mortality by prehospital transportation. RESULTS: 2853 patients were included; 7.8% (n = 223) died. Patients were transported by PV (n = 1963, 68.8%), minibus (n = 497, 17.4%), and police (268, 9.4%). No patients were transported by ambulance. Patients transported by police (1 h, IQR 0-2) and PV (1 h, IQR 0-2), arrived earlier than those transported by minibus (2 h, IQR 0-27), p < 0.001. There was no difference in injury severity between the transportation cohorts. Compared to PV, patients transported by police (RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.13-2.17, p = 0.008) have an increased risk of mortality after controlling for injury severity. There was no difference in mortality in patients presenting by minibus (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.55-1.24, p = 0.4). CONCLUSION: Patients transported to KCH via police have a higher risk of mortality than those transported via private vehicle after controlling for injury severity. Training police in basic life support may be an initial target of intervention in reducing trauma mortality. Overall, the creation of a functional prehospital ambulance system with a cadre of paramedics is necessary for both trauma and non-trauma patients alike. This can only be achieved by training all stakeholders, the police, public transport drivers, and the public at large.

Design and Implementation of a Hospital-based Trauma Surveillance Registry in a Resource-Poor Setting: A Cost Analysis Study.

INTRODUCTION: Trauma is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality globally, with a disproportionate burden affecting low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). Rapid urbanization and differences in transportation patterns result in unique injury patterns in LMIC. Trauma registries are essential to determine the impact of trauma and the nature of injuries in LMIC to enable hospitals and healthcare systems to optimize care and to allocate resources. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis of prospectively collected data in the Kamuzu Central Hospital (KCH) Trauma Registry from 2018 - 2019 was performed. Activity-based costing, a bottom-up cost analysis method to determine the cost per patient registered, was completed after systematically analyzing the standard operating procedures of the KCH trauma registry. RESULTS: During the study period, 12,616 patients were included in the KCH Trauma Registry. Startup costs for the trauma registry are estimated at $3,196.24. This sum includes $1815.84 for personnel cost, $200 for database initiation (REDCap database), $342.50 for initial data clerk training, and $787.90 for registry and office supplies. Recurrent costs occurring in 2018, included personnel, technology, supply, and facility costs. Five data clerks, one data clerk manager, and a registry manager are required for 24/7 data collection, data integrity, and database maintenance, with an estimated cost of $29,697.24 per year. Yearly recurrent data clerk training costs are $137.00. Internet and facility costs for a data clerk office and secure record storage are $1632.60 per year. Supplies for the completion of trauma intake forms (binders, paper, pens) are $1431.80 per year. The total annual cost of the trauma registry at a tertiary hospital in Malawi is $33,361.64, which costs $2.64 per patient registered in the registry in 2018. CONCLUSION: Trauma registries are necessary for the assessment of the local trauma burden and injury pattern, but require significant financial commitment and time. To fully capture the local burden of trauma in resource-limited settings, acquiring, validating, and analyzing accurate data is crucial. Anticipating the financial burden of a trauma surveillance registry ahead of time is imperative.

One Month of Cannabis Abstinence in Adolescents and Young Adults Is Associated With Improved Memory.

OBJECTIVE: Associations between adolescent cannabis use and poor neurocognitive functioning have been reported from cross-sectional studies that cannot determine causality. Prospective designs can assess whether extended cannabis abstinence has a beneficial effect on cognition. METHODS: Eighty-eight adolescents and young adults (aged 16-25 years) who used cannabis regularly were recruited from the community and a local high school between July 2015 and December 2016. Participants were randomly assigned to 4 weeks of cannabis abstinence, verified by decreasing 11-nor-9-carboxy-∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol urine concentration (MJ-Abst; n = 62), or a monitoring control condition with no abstinence requirement (MJ-Mon; n = 26). Attention and memory were assessed at baseline and weekly for 4 weeks with the Cambridge Neuropsychological Test Automated Battery. RESULTS: Among MJ-Abst participants, 55 (88.7%) met a priori criteria for biochemically confirmed 30-day continuous abstinence. There was an effect of abstinence on verbal memory (P = .002) that was consistent across 4 weeks of abstinence, with no time-by-abstinence interaction, and was driven by improved verbal learning in the first week of abstinence. MJ-Abst participants had better memory overall and at weeks 1, 2, 3 than MJ-Mon participants, and only MJ-Abst participants improved in memory from baseline to week 1. There was no effect of abstinence on attention: both groups improved similarly, consistent with a practice effect. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that cannabis abstinence is associated with improvements in verbal learning that appear to occur largely in the first week following last use. Future studies are needed to determine whether the improvement in cognition with abstinence is associated with improvement in academic and other functional outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03276221.

Prolonged cannabis withdrawal in young adults with lifetime psychiatric illness.

Young adults with psychiatric illnesses are more likely to use cannabis and experience problems from use. It is not known whether those with a lifetime psychiatric illness experience a prolonged cannabis withdrawal syndrome with abstinence. Participants were fifty young adults, aged 18-25, recruited from the Boston-area in 2015-2016, who used cannabis at least weekly, completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV to identify Axis I psychiatric diagnoses (PD+ vs PD-), and attained cannabis abstinence with a four-week contingency management protocol. Withdrawal symptom severity was assessed at baseline and at four weekly abstinent visits using the Cannabis Withdrawal Scale. Cannabis dependence, age of initiation, and rate of abstinence were similar in PD+ and PD- groups. There was a diagnostic group by abstinent week interaction, suggesting a difference in time course for resolution of withdrawal symptoms by group, F(4,46)=3.8, p=0.009, controlling for sex, baseline depressive and anxiety symptoms, and frequency of cannabis use in the prior 90days. In post hoc analyses, there was a difference in time-course of cannabis withdrawal. PD- had significantly reduced withdrawal symptom severity in abstinent week one [t(46)=-2.2, p=0.03], while PD+ did not report improved withdrawal symptoms until the second abstinent week [t(46)=-4.1, p=0.0002]. Cannabis withdrawal symptoms improved over four weeks in young people with and without a lifetime psychiatric diagnosis. However, those with a psychiatric illness reported one week delayed improvement in withdrawal symptom severity. Longer duration of cannabis withdrawal may be a risk factor for cannabis dependence and difficulty quitting.