Alterations in 18F-FDG accumulation into neck-related muscles after neck dissection for patients with oral cancers

BACKGROUND: 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (18F-FDG) accumulations are commonly seen in the neck-related muscles of the surgical and non-surgical sides after surgery with neck dissection (ND) for oral cancers, which leads to radiologists having difficulty in diagnosing the lesions. To examine the alterations in 18F-FDG accumulation in neck-related muscles of patients after ND for oral cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 18F-FDG accumulations on positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) in neck-related muscles were retrospectively analyzed after surgical dissection of cervical lymph nodes in oral cancers. RESULTS: According to the extent of ND of cervical lymph nodes, the rate of patients with 18F-FDG-PET-positive areas increased in the trapezius, sternocleidomastoid, and posterior neck muscles of the surgical and/or non-surgical sides. In addition, SUVmax of 18F-FDG-PET-positive areas in the trapezius and sternocleidomastoid muscles were increased according to the extent of the ND. CONCLUSIONS: In evaluating 18F-FDG accumulations after ND for oral cancers, we should pay attention to the 18F-FDG distributions in neck-related muscles including the non-surgical side as false-positive findings

Reflection of ¹8F-FDG accumulation in the evaluation of the extent of periapical or periodontal inflammation.

OBJECTIVES: To elucidate whether fluorine-18-labeled ((18)F) fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG) accumulation can reflect the extent of periodontal inflammation, periapical inflammation, or dental caries. STUDY DESIGN: (18)F-FDG accumulations on positron emission tomography (PET)-computed tomography (CT) were retrospectively compared with the size of the bone resorption areas caused by periodontal inflammation, periapical inflammation, or dental caries on panoramic radiographs, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 44 subjects. RESULTS: A significant correlation was found between the size of the bone resorption area caused by periodontal (r = 0.595, P < .01) or periapical (r = 0.560, P < .01) inflammation and the highest standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of (18)F-FDG accumulation. A significant correlation was found between the periodontal (r = 0.622, P < .01) or periapical (r = 0.394, P < .01) inflammatory findings on MRI and the SUVmax of (18)F-FDG accumulation. The SUVmax of (18)F-FDG around most teeth with caries was under 1.5. CONCLUSIONS: (18)F-FDG accumulation reflects the extent of dental inflammation, not dental caries.