Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Dent Med Probl ; 59(4): 637-645, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36537854

ABSTRACT

The management of complex dental trauma can be modulated according to the emergencies that may arise over time. Clinical management of transverse root fractures may require different therapies based on situations, such as delay and error in the treatment of an avulsion trauma associated with apical third root fracture, patient's poor compliance, or external and internal root resorption. The primary aim of this article was to review studies regarding root fractures in the permanent dentition and root fracture management. The secondary aim was to present the inflammatory reaction and the complications (i.e., infections) that may occur if the International Association for Dental Traumatology (IADT) guidelines are not followed. In addition, a scenario is devised in which endodontic surgery, despite the baseline patient's conditions and negative prognosis, can help to inhibit the inflammatory root resorption and allow the preservation of soft and hard tissues within a long follow-up from the injury, for the purpose of demonstrating the next possible implant-prosthetic rehabilitation.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone , Root Resorption , Tooth Avulsion , Tooth Fractures , Humans , Tooth Fractures/complications , Tooth Fractures/therapy , Root Resorption/therapy , Root Resorption/complications , Tooth Avulsion/complications , Tooth Avulsion/surgery , Dentition, Permanent
2.
Eur J Oral Implantol ; 7(2): 153-71, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24977250

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of onlay bone blocks of equine origin (test or XB group) with autogenous bone blocks (control or AB group) harvested from the ramus or the iliac crest for the rehabilitation of partially or fully edentulous atrophic jaws with implant supported prostheses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients with partially or fully edentulous atrophic jaws having less than 5 mm of residual crestal bone height and/or less than 3 mm of bone thickness, as measured on computerised tomography (CT) scans, were randomised into two groups according to a parallel group design, either to be augmented with autogenous onlay bone blocks (20 patients; AB group) from the mandibular ramus or the iliac crest, or with onlays blocks of spongious bone of equine origin (20 patients; XB group). Two centres treated 20 patients each. Six XB blocks were modelled on lithographic models of the jaws before grafting. The blocks were fixed with screws and osteosynthesis plates and were covered with resorbable barriers made of equine cortical bone and fixed with tacks. The autogenous bone grafts were left to heal for 4 months and the xenografts for 7 months before placing implants, which were submerged. After 4 months, either bar-retained overdentures or provisional reinforced acrylic prostheses were delivered. Provisional prostheses were replaced, after 4 months, by definitive fixed prostheses. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures; complications; patient satisfaction; pain recorded 3 and 10 days post-augmentation; number of days of hospitalisation, total and partial infirmity days. All patients were followed for 4 months after loading. RESULTS: All patients could be rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses and none dropped out. Twenty-eight patients were augmented in the maxilla (15 with AB and 13 with XB) and 12 in the mandible (5 with AB and 7 with XB). No AB graft failed totally versus 10 XB grafts (difference = 0.5; 95% CI 0.23 to 0.68; P = 0.0004). In particular, all 7 XB mandibular grafts and 5 out of 6 XB blocks (3 in mandibles and 2 in maxillas), which were previously modelled on lithographic models of the jaws failed. One implant failed in one AB patient versus 11 implants in 4 XB patients (P = 0.3416). All but 1 prostheses were loaded in time in the AB patients, versus 4 prostheses which were loaded with delays in XB patients because of graft and implant failures (P = 0.3416). Four complications occurred in 4 AB patients versus 15 complications in 12 XB patients (difference = 0.4; 95% CI 0.09 to 0.63; P = 0.0225). Fourteen AB patients reported moderate pain 3 days postoperatively versus 6 XB patients (P = 0.0562); at 10 days, 10 AB patients reported moderate pain versus 1 XB patient (difference = -0.45; 95% CI -0.65 to -0.17; P = 0.0033). The 14 patients harvested from the iliac crest were hospitalised for an average of 3.1 nights, whereas 7 patients treated with XB were hospitalised on average for 1.4 nights (P <0.0001). The number of total and partial infirmity days was 126 for theAB group and 43 for the XB group, and 220 for the AB group and 93 for the XB group, respectively (mean day difference = -4.15; 95% CI -7.35 to -0.95; P = 0.0134 and mean day difference = -5.7; 95% CI -10.01 to -1.39; P = 0.0116, respectively). Seventeen AB patients versus 19 XB patients were fully satisfied with function of their prostheses (P = 0.6050), 18 AB patients versus 12 XB patients were fully satisfied with aesthetics of their prostheses (P = 0.0648), and 5 and 3 patients, respectively would not undergo the same procedure again (P = 0.6948). There were no differences between the outcomes of the two centres with exception of prosthesis failures and complications in the maxilla. CONCLUSIONS: Autogenous onlay bone blocks are superior to equine onlay bone blocks, especially in mandibles, where all equine blocks failed, therefore we strongly discourage the use of onlay bone blocks of equine origin in mandibles.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Autografts/transplantation , Bone Transplantation/methods , Dental Implants , Heterografts/transplantation , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/surgery , Jaw, Edentulous/surgery , Adult , Alveolar Bone Loss/rehabilitation , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/instrumentation , Animals , Atrophy , Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported , Dental Restoration Failure , Denture Design , Denture, Overlay , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft Survival , Horses , Hospitalization , Humans , Jaw, Edentulous/rehabilitation , Jaw, Edentulous, Partially/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Implant Dent ; 20(4): 262-6, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21778889

ABSTRACT

This case report describes an inlay augmentation procedure with resorbable bone plates and fixation screws in a case of vertical atrophy of the anterior mandible. After 3 months from the surgery, vertical bone height augmentation was evaluated, and at the time of implant insertion, core biopsies from the grafted area were taken. Moreover, 8 months after the start of prosthetic loading, radiographic assessments showed no pathological signs. This case report shows that the effectiveness of resorbable plates during the graft healing process is similar to that of titanium plates.


Subject(s)
Absorbable Implants , Alveolar Bone Loss/surgery , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Substitutes , Mandible/surgery , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/instrumentation , Bone Matrix/transplantation , Bone Plates , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Female , Humans , Mandibular Diseases/surgery , Middle Aged , Minerals , Polyglactin 910 , Treatment Outcome
4.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res ; 11 Suppl 1: e69-82, 2009 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19681938

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of inlay and onlay bone grafting techniques in terms of vertical bone formation and implant outcomes for correcting atrophic posterior mandibles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty surgical sites were assigned to two treatment groups, inlay and onlay, with iliac crest as donor site. After 3 to 4 months, 43 implants were placed and loaded 4 months later. The median follow up after loading was 18 months. RESULTS: For the inlay versus onlay group, median bone gain was 4.9 versus 6.5 mm (p = .019), median bone resorption was 0.5 versus 2.75 mm (p < .001), and median final vertical augmentation was 4.1 versus 4 mm (p = .190). The implant survival rate was 100% in both groups, while the implant success rate was 90% versus 86.9% (p = .190, not significant). A minor and major complication rate of 20% and 10%, respectively, for both groups was encountered. CONCLUSIONS: Inlay results in less bone resorption and more predictable outcomes, but requires an experienced surgeon. In contrast, onlay results in greater bone resorption and requires a bone block graft oversized in height, but involves a shorter learning curve. Once implant placement has been carried out, the outcomes are similar for both procedures.


Subject(s)
Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Bone Transplantation/methods , Mandible/surgery , Adult , Aged , Alveolar Bone Loss , Bone Regeneration , Bone Resorption , Dental Implantation, Endosseous , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Single-Blind Method , Treatment Outcome , Vertical Dimension
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...