Is There a Causal Relationship between Physical Activity and Bone Microarchitecture? A Study of Adult Female Twin Pairs.

The reasons for the association between physical activity (PA) and bone microarchitecture traits are unclear. We examined whether these associations were consistent with causation and/or with shared familial factors using a cross-sectional study of 47 dizygotic and 93 monozygotic female twin pairs aged 31-77 years. Images of the nondominant distal tibia were obtained using high-resolutionperipheral quantitative computed tomography. The bone microarchitecture was assessed using StrAx1.0 software. Based on a self-completed questionnaire, a PA index was calculated as a weighted sum of weekly hours of light (walking, light gardening), moderate (social tennis, golf, hiking), and vigorous activity (competitive active sports) = light + 2 * moderate + 3 * vigorous. We applied Inference about Causation through Examination of FAmiliaL CONfounding (ICE FALCON) to test whether cross-pair cross-trait associations changed after adjustment for within-individual associations. Within-individual distal tibia cortical cross-sectional area (CSA) and cortical thickness were positively associated with PA (regression coefficients [ß] = 0.20 and 0.22), while the porosity of the inner transitional zone was negatively associated with PA (ß = -0.17), all p < 0.05. Trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD) and trabecular thickness were positively associated with PA (ß = 0.13 and 0.14), and medullary CSA was negatively associated with PA (ß = -0.22), all p ≤ 0.01. Cross-pair cross-trait associations of cortical thickness, cortical CSA, and medullary CSA with PA attenuated after adjustment for the within-individual association (p = 0.048, p = 0.062, and p = 0.028 for changes). In conclusion, increasing PA was associated with thicker cortices, larger cortical area, lower porosity of the inner transitional zone, thicker trabeculae, and smaller medullary cavities. The attenuation of cross-pair cross-trait associations after accounting for the within-individual associations was consistent with PA having a causal effect on the improved cortical and trabecular microarchitecture of adult females, in addition to shared familial factors. © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Cortical bone structure of the proximal femur and incident fractures.

PURPOSE: Fracture risk is most frequently assessed using Dual X-ray absorptiometry to measure areal bone mineral density (aBMD) and using the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX). However, these approaches have limitations and additional bone measurements may enhance the predictive ability of these existing tools. Increased cortical porosity has been associated with incident fracture in some studies, but not in others. In this prospective study, we examined whether cortical bone structure of the proximal femur predicts incident fractures independent of aBMD and FRAX score. METHODS: We pooled 211 postmenopausal women with fractures aged 54-94 years at baseline and 232 fracture-free age-matched controls based on a prior nested case-control study from the Tromsø Study in Norway. We assessed baseline femoral neck (FN) aBMD, calculated FRAX 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fracture (MOF), and quantified femoral subtrochanteric cortical parameters: porosity, area, thickness, and volumetric BMD (vBMD) from CT images using the StrAx1.0 software. Associations between bone parameters and any incident fracture, MOF and hip fracture were determined using Cox's proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 7.2 years, 114 (25.7%) of 443 women suffered one or more incident fracture. Cortical bone structure did not predict any incident fracture or MOF after adjustment for age, BMI, and previous fracture. Each SD higher total cortical porosity, thinner cortices, and lower cortical vBMD predicted hip fracture with increased risk of 46-62% (HRs ranging from 1.46 (1.01-2.11) to 1.62 (1.02-2.57)). After adjustment for FN aBMD or FRAX score no association remained significant. Both lower FN aBMD and higher FRAX score predicted any incident fracture, MOF and hip fractures with HRs ranging from 1.45-2.56. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that cortical bone measurements using clinical CT did not add substantial insight into fracture risk beyond FN aBMD and FRAX. We infer from these results that fracture risk related to the deteriorated bone structure seems to be largely captured by a measurement of FN aBMD and the FRAX tool.