Impact of acute kidney injury and renal recovery status in deceased donor to kidney transplant outcome: results from the Thai national transplant registry.

The influence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and renal recovery in deceased donor (DD) on long-term kidney transplant (KT) outcome has not previously been elucidated in large registry study. Our retrospective cohort study included all DDKT performed in Thailand between 2001 and 2018. Donor data was reviewed case by case. AKI was diagnosed according to the KDIGO criteria. Renal recovery was defined if DD had an improvement in AKI to the normal or lower stage. All outcomes were determined until the end of 2020. This study enrolled 4234 KT recipients from 2198 DD. The KDIGO staging of AKI was as follows: stage 1 for 710 donors (32.3%), stage 2 for 490 donors (22.3%) and stage 3 for 342 donors (15.6%). AKI was partial and complete recovery in 265 (17.2%) and 287 (18.6%) before procurement, respectively. Persistent AKI was revealed in 1906 KT of 990 (45%) DD. The ongoing AKI in DD significantly increases the risk of DGF development in the adjusted model (HR 1.69; 95% CI 1.44-1.99; p < 0.001). KT from DD with AKI and partial/complete recovery was associated with a lower risk of transplant loss (log-rank P = 0.04) and recipient mortality (log-rank P = 0.042) than ongoing AKI. KT from a donor with ongoing stage 3 AKI was associated with a higher risk of all-cause graft loss (HR 1.8; 95% CI 1.12-2.88; p = 0.02) and mortality (HR 2.19; 95% CI 1.09-4.41; p = 0.03) than stage 3 AKI with renal recovery. Persistent AKI, but not recovered AKI, significantly increases the risk of DGF. Utilizing kidneys from donors with improving AKI is generally safe. KT from donors with persistent AKI stage 3 results in a higher risk of transplant failure and recipient mortality. Therefore, meticulous pretransplant evaluation of such kidneys and intensive surveillance after KT is recommended.

First Asian Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) and Estimated Post-Transplant Survival (EPTS) models, with validation against US models in Thai population.

INTRODUCTION: Differences in transplant characteristics limit the application of kidney donor profile index (KDPI) and estimated post-transplant survival (EPTS) models developed in Western countries to Asian populations. METHODS: We analyzed data of the Thai Transplant Registry and the Thai Red Cross Society on 2558 DDKTs performed between 2001 and 2014. Thai KDPI and EPTS models were developed using Cox regression, and validation against the US models. RESULTS: Thai KDPI was developed based on seven donor factors: age, height, best estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, cerebrovascular accident, and adrenaline infusion. The Thai and US donor risk index had comparable predictive abilities for transplant survival (C-statistics .5871 vs. .5548; P = .429). KTs from donors with a US KDPI > 70% demonstrated significantly worse 5-year transplant survival. The Thai EPTS model was developed from four recipient factors: age, body weight, diabetes mellitus, and hepatitis C infection. The C-statistics of the Thai and US EPTS models were comparable (.5924 vs. .6039; P = .360). A US EPTS > 70% was revealed in only 2.5% of our cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The first simplified KDPI and EPTS models for an Asian population were developed. Our models are available at www.thai-kdpi-epts.org.

Orthotopic liver transplantation at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital: a report.

Orthotopic liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of choice for various liver diseases including early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). After the first successful LT in Thailand at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital (KCMH) in 1987, the number of LT has gradually been increasing in parallel with the improvement in patient survival. The recent outcomes of LT are reported herein. From January 1, 2002 to June 30, 2013, 120 cases of adult LT and 24 cases of pediatric LT were performed. The most common indication for LT was HCC in the adult whereas biliary atresia was the most common indication for LT in pediatric patients. As for the severity of liver disease, the average model of end stage liver disease (MELD) and pediatric end stage liver disease (PELD) scores were 19 in adult LT and 21.5 in pediatric LT respectively. The most common perioperative complication in adult LT was acute renal failure (25%). One-, five-year patient survival in adult LT and pediatric LT were 85%, 69% and 96%, 91%, respectively. In conclusion, the outcomes of LT at KCMH have gradually been improving close to the world standard, especially the patient survival.

Partial segment-IV/V liver resection facilitates the repair of complicated bile duct injury.

The ability to perform a technically perfect anastomosis remains the key to success in bile duct repair. This report describes our technique in facilitating the performance of a good surgical anastomosis for difficult bile duct repair. In the present study are presented 3 cases of bile duct repair for a Strasberg type-E3 stricture, a Strasberg type-E4 fistula and an anastomotic stricture of a previously performed choledochojejunostomy for the correction of bile duct injury. The approach was to perform partial resection of the lower part of segments IV and V. The hepatoduodenal ligament was not dissected. The anterior surface of the bile duct was utilized to perform Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. Operative times ranged from 4 to 5 hours, and Pringle times 15 to 25 minutes. There was no vascular injury. We were able to perform wide anastomoses, facilitated by excellent exposure of the hilar plate. There was no any complication. Partial resection of the hepatic segments IV-V provides excellent exposure of the hilar plate. The risk of vascular injury was minimized by avoiding dissection of the hepatoduodenal ligament. It is believe this technique may offer a superior approach to difficult repair of complicated bile duct injury.

Role of portal vein embolization in hepatobiliary malignancy.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Inadequate remnant liver volume is the major cause of postoperative liver failure. Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is the well accepted procedure to increase future liver remnant (FLR) volume and decrease the incidence of this complication. This study described the author's experience of preoperative PVE at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital since 2002. METHODOLOGY: The clinical data of 29 patients who underwent PVE were reviewed. The FLR volumes before and after the procedure were calculated by CT volumetry. PVE was performed when estimated FLR volume was < 25% in normal liver or < 40% in damaged liver and also when major liver resection combined with major intraabdominal surgery was planned. The complications after PVE and hepatectomy were recorded. RESULTS: There were no deaths or complications after PVE. The mean growth of FLR was 11%. Power of liver regeneration was suboptimal in old age patients. Sixteen patients underwent liver resection (resectability rate 55.17%). There were 2 cases of postoperative hyperbilirubinemia (12.5%). The hospital mortality rate was 1/16 (6.25%). CONCLUSIONS: PVE is a useful and safe optional procedure to increase FLR. It not only reduces the postoperative liver failure but also increases the chance of curative resection.

Safety and hemostatic effect of recombinant activated factor VII in cirrhotic patients undergoing partial hepatectomy: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Coagulopathy caused by cirrhosis may contribute to excessive bleeding during hepatectomy. We evaluated the hemostatic effect and safety of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) in cirrhotic patients undergoing partial hepatectomy. METHODS: Patients were randomized to rFVIIa 50 or 100 mug/kg or placebo, administered intravenously 10 minutes before surgery and every second hour during surgery. The primary efficacy end points were the proportion of patients receiving red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and the amount of RBCs transfused. The RBC transfusion trigger was blood loss of 500 mL. Safety end points included thromboembolic and adverse events. RESULTS: No statistically significant effect of rFVIIa treatment on efficacy end points was observed. Serious and thromboembolic adverse events occurred at similar incidences in the study groups. CONCLUSIONS: Using blood loss as a transfusion trigger, the efficacy of rFVIIa in reducing the requirement for RBC transfusion was not established in this study. No safety concerns were identified.

Acute mesenteric ischemia: still high mortality rate in the era of 24-hour availability of angiography.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a serious condition with high mortality rate due to difficult and late diagnosis. Early and aggressive evaluation in high risk patients by mesenteric angiography is the key to the reduction in mortality rate. However; many physicians hesitated to perform it because of its availability, the risk of complications and high negative results. This study reviewed outcome of AMI in term of mortality rate, factors associated with mortality and the rate of angiography in high risk patients. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The clinical data of the patients who were diagnosed as AMI were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical outcome was recorded and the factors associated with mortality were analysed. RESULTS: Thirty-five patients were enrolled into this study during 5 years. The mortality rate was 74.3%. There were 22 high risk patients for AMI. The rate of angiography performed in this group was 4.5% (1/22). The factors associated with mortality were age more than 60 years, patients with peritonitis, hypotension, arterial cause, time interval between admission and operation or treatment more than 24 hours, bowel gangrene >100 cms. However all these factors were not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: The mortality rate of AMI is still high even at the tertiary hospital where the angiography is available 24 hours. To decrease the mortality rate, the physicians must have the high index of suspicion in high risk patients and do not hesitate to perform early mesenteric angiography.

Risk factors associated with major intraoperative blood loss in hepatic resection for hepatobiliary tumor.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Hepatic resection is the mainstay treatment of hepatobiliary tumor Nowadays, mortality is less than 6%. However, morbidity is still high. Bleeding is one of the most common problems during hepatic resection which can sometimes lead to catastrophe. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the risk factors associated with major blood loss during hepatic resection for hepatobiliary tumor. MATERIAL AND METHOD: A total of 69 consecutive patients who underwent elective hepatic resection for hepatobiliary tumor from May 2002 to April 2004 were enrolled into this retrospective study. The Patients were divided into 2 groups(group I and II) according to the intraoperative blood loss. Patients who had a blood loss of more than 1000 ml were defined as the major blood loss group(group I). Thirteen variable factors were analyzed to determine the risk of major intraoperative blood loss. Operative outcomes between the two groups were also compared. RESULTS: Of the sixty-nine patients, 36 patients were in group I and 33 patients were in group II. 75% of the patients in group I and 36.4% of the patients in group II were transfused. Median blood transfusion in group I and II were 3 and 0 units of packed red cell. Univariate analysis showed tumor size, extent of hepatic resection, tumor pathology and operative time were factors affecting major intraoperative blood loss. However, multivariate analysis showed only operative time and tumor size to be independent risk factors. Patients in group I had higher surgical morbidity and prolonged hospital stay compared with patients in group II. CONCLUSION: Blood loss is still a major concern in performing hepatic resection. From the present study, tumor size and operative time are the independent factors affecting major intraoperative blood loss. Proper screening or a surveillance program may enhance the chance to find small tumors. Refined operative techniques such as anterior approach and liver hanging would facilitate resection for large right sided tumors.

Is there any role of acid reducing gastric surgery in peptic ulcer perforation?

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is known to be the prime factor of peptic ulcer disease as well as NSAID usage. Although medical treatment of the bacteria can eliminate the problem for more than 90% of the infected people but the cost of treatment is high then acid reducing gastric surgery still has a definite role. The prevalence of H. pylori in peptic ulcer perferation is still unknown also whether vagotomy and gastrectomy could eradicate H. pylori. Now laparoscopic surgery especially the simple repair of the perforation has became routinely used in many part of the world. So acid reducing gastric surgery is a good choice in chronic user of NSAID and also an option for people who have H. pylori infection.

Preoperative portal vein embolization in hepatobiliary tract malignancy: an experience at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.

BACKGROUND: Major hepatic resections are increasingly performed for both primary and secondary liver cancers nowadays. However, morbidity from these operations is still high. One of the dreadful complications, sometimes lead to fatality, is postoperative liver failure. There are many factors which are associated with this complication such as chronic liver disease, low residual liver volume after resection. Portal vein embolization (PVE) is the procedure which increases the liver volume of the non-embolized lobe. Now, PVE has gained acceptance in many centers to overcome or reduce this complication. This report described the authors' experiences of PVE since 2001 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The records of 10 patients who had PVE were reviewed CT volumetry of the liver was done before and after procedure. The authors calculated future liver remnant from CT volumetry and compared this volume to standard liver volume. The postoperative complications and hospital courses of these patients were also recorded. RESULTS: Mean growth of future liver remnant (FLR) ratio after PVE was 13.7 +/- 6.2% (median 13, range 4-25). There was no major complication after PVE. Six patients underwent liver resection and there was no major complication or mortality. No one had persistent hyperbilirubinemia 2 weeks after operation. CONCLUSION: The PVE is the useful and safe optional procedure to increase future liver remnant volume. It not only reduces the postoperative liver failure but increases the chance for curative resection.

Result of orthotopic liver transplantation at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital: the first series from Thailand.

Liver transplantation is one of the best treatments for advanced liver disease since it can prolong the patient's survival. In Thailand, the first liver transplantation was performed in 1987 at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital. Up till now the authors have transplanted the most in Thailand, having done more than 30 cases. From 1997 to 2002, there were 20 cases of liver transplantation and this is the result presented. The authors classified the patients into 2 groups, according to primary indications for transplantation. Patients with cirrhosis were included in group I and patients with hepatocellular carcinoma were included in group II. The one year survival in group I and II was 64 per cent and 29 per cent respectively. Mortality rate in the cirrhotic group was high during the first 3 months post transplant. The reason for a high mortality rate in the hepatocellular carcinoma group may be secondary to the advanced stage of cancer and the poor condition of the patients. However, the acute rejection rate in the present series of 25 per cent is relatively low compared to other series and this may need further study. The one year survival rate in patients who received a new liver from 1997 to 1999 compared to 2000-2002 was 33 per cent and 54 per cent respectively. This showed an improvement in the result of liver transplantation in Thailand. In conclusion, this report showed a satisfactory result of liver transplantation. The main problem with liver transplantation in Thailand is that potential donors do not understand the problems which leads to few donors. There is also a shortage of skilled personnel, budget, and the appropriate instruments.