A novel binding site between the voltage-dependent calcium channel CaV1.2 subunit and CaVß2 subunit discovered using a new analysis method for protein-protein interactions.

We developed a new method to analyze protein-protein interactions using a dual-inducible prokaryotic expression system. To evaluate protein-protein binding, a chimeric fusion toxin gene was constructed using a DNase-treated short DNA fragment (epitope library) and CcdB, which encodes a DNA topoisomerase II toxin. Protein-protein interactions would affect toxin activity, resulting in colony formation. Using this novel system, we found a new binding site in the voltage-dependent calcium channel α1 subunit (CaV1.2) for the voltage-dependent calcium channel ß2 subunit. Prokaryotic expression screening of the ß2 subunit using an epitope library of CaV1.2 resulted in two overlapping clones of the C-terminal sequence of CaV1.2. In vitro overlay and immunoprecipitation analyses revealed preferential binding of the C-terminal sequences of CaV1.2 and ß2.

A simple, dual direct expression plasmid system in prokaryotic and mammalian cells.

We introduce a simple, dual direct cloning plasmid system (pgMAX-II) for gene expression analysis in both prokaryotic (Escherichia coli) and mammalian cells. This system, which uses a prokaryotic expression unit adapted from the pgMAX system and a mammalian promoter, is effective for subcloning using the DNA topoisomerase II toxin CcdB. Given that molecular biological cloning systems broadly rely on E. coli for rapid growth, the proposed concept may have wide applicability beyond mammalian cells.

Analysis of circadian rhythm components in EEG/EMG data of aged mice.

Aging disrupts circadian clocks, as evidenced by a reduction in the amplitude of circadian rhythms. Because the circadian clock strongly influences sleep-wake behavior in mammals, age-related alterations in sleep-wake patterns may be attributable, at least partly, to functional changes in the circadian clock. However, the effect of aging on the circadian characteristics of sleep architecture has not been well assessed, as circadian behaviors are usually evaluated through long-term behavioral recording with wheel-running or infrared sensors. In this study, we examined age-related changes in circadian sleep-wake behavior using circadian components extracted from electroencephalography (EEG) and electromyography (EMG) data. EEG and EMG were recorded from 12 to 17-week-old and 78 to 83-week-old mice for 3 days under light/dark and constant dark conditions. We analyzed time-dependent changes in the duration of sleep. Rapid eye movement (REM) and non-REM (NREM) sleep significantly increased during the night phase in old mice, whereas no significant change was observed during the light phase. The circadian components were then extracted from the EEG data for each sleep-wake stage, revealing that the circadian rhythm in the power of delta waves during NREM sleep was attenuated and delayed in old mice. Furthermore, we used machine learning to evaluate the phase of the circadian rhythm, with EEG data serving as the input and the phase of the sleep-wake rhythm (environmental time) as the output. The results indicated that the output time for the old mice data tended to be delayed, specifically at night. These results indicate that the aging process significantly impacts the circadian rhythm in the EEG power spectrum despite the circadian rhythm in the amounts of sleep and wake attenuated but still remaining in old mice. Moreover, EEG/EMG analysis is useful not only for evaluating sleep-wake stages but also for circadian rhythms in the brain.

Structure and Function of Neuronal Circuits Linking Ventrolateral Preoptic Nucleus and Lateral Hypothalamic Area.

To understand how sleep-wakefulness cycles are regulated, it is essential to disentangle structural and functional relationships between the preoptic area (POA) and lateral hypothalamic area (LHA), since these regions play important yet opposing roles in the sleep-wakefulness regulation. GABA- and galanin (GAL)-producing neurons in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO) of the POA (VLPOGABA and VLPOGAL neurons) are responsible for the maintenance of sleep, while the LHA contains orexin-producing neurons (orexin neurons) that are crucial for maintenance of wakefulness. Through the use of rabies virus-mediated neural tracing combined with in situ hybridization (ISH) in male and female orexin-iCre mice, we revealed that the vesicular GABA transporter (Vgat, Slc32a1)- and galanin (Gal)-expressing neurons in the VLPO directly synapse with orexin neurons in the LHA. A majority (56.3 ± 8.1%) of all VLPO input neurons connecting to orexin neurons were double-positive for Vgat and Gal Using projection-specific rabies virus-mediated tracing in male and female Vgat-ires-Cre and Gal-Cre mice, we discovered that VLPOGABA and VLPOGAL neurons that send projections to the LHA received innervations from similarly distributed input neurons in many brain regions, with the POA and LHA being among the main upstream areas. Additionally, we found that acute optogenetic excitation of axons of VLPOGABA neurons, but not VLPOGAL neurons, in the LHA of male Vgat-ires-Cre mice induced wakefulness. This study deciphers the connectivity between the VLPO and LHA, provides a large-scale map of upstream neuronal populations of VLPO→LHA neurons, and reveals a previously uncovered function of the VLPOGABA→LHA pathway in the regulation of sleep and wakefulness.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We identified neurons in the ventrolateral preoptic nucleus (VLPO) that are positive for vesicular GABA transporter (Vgat) and/or galanin (Gal) and serve as presynaptic partners of orexin-producing neurons in the lateral hypothalamic area (LHA). We depicted monosynaptic input neurons of GABA- and galanin-producing neurons in the VLPO that send projections to the LHA throughout the entire brain. Their input neurons largely overlap, suggesting that they comprise a common neuronal population. However, acute excitatory optogenetic manipulation of the VLPOGABA→LHA pathway, but not the VLPOGAL→LHA pathway, evoked wakefulness. This study shows the connectivity of major components of the sleep/wake circuitry in the hypothalamus and unveils a previously unrecognized function of the VLPOGABA→LHA pathway in sleep-wakefulness regulation. Furthermore, we suggest the existence of subpopulations of VLPOGABA neurons that innervate LHA.

Rapid method for plasmid DNA recombination (Murakami-system).

DNA recombination is a useful technology for cloning and subsequent functional analysis, while standard techniques for plasmid DNA recombination have remained unchanged. In the present study, we introduced rapid method for plasmid DNA recombination, which we named "Murakami-system", to complete the experiments in under 33 h. For this purpose, we selected the following: PCR amplification with 25 cycles and E. coli strain with rapid growth (incubation time of 6-8 h). In addition, we selected rapid plasmid DNA purification (mini-prep; ∼10 min) and rapid restriction enzyme incubation (20 min). This recombination system enabled rapid plasmid DNA recombination within 24-33 h, which could be useful in various fields. We also established a 1-day method for competent cell preparation. Our rapid recombination system allowed several sessions of plasmid DNA recombination to be performed every week, which improves the functional analysis of various genes.•"Rapid method for plasmid DNA recombination (Murakami-system).•E. coli strain with rapid growth (incubation time of 6-8 h).•Combination of rapid protocols (PCR, electrophoresis, DNA purification, ligation, and mini-prep) enabled plasmid DNA recombination within 24-33 h.

Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors Chrm1 and Chrm3 Are Essential for REM Sleep.

Sleep regulation involves interdependent signaling among specialized neurons in distributed brain regions. Although acetylcholine promotes wakefulness and rapid eye movement (REM) sleep, it is unclear whether the cholinergic pathway is essential (i.e., absolutely required) for REM sleep because of redundancy from neural circuits to molecules. First, we demonstrate that synaptic inhibition of TrkA+ cholinergic neurons causes a severe short-sleep phenotype and that sleep reduction is mostly attributable to a shortened sleep duration in the dark phase. Subsequent comprehensive knockout of acetylcholine receptor genes by the triple-target CRISPR method reveals that a similar short-sleep phenotype appears in the knockout of two Gq-type acetylcholine receptors Chrm1 and Chrm3. Strikingly, Chrm1 and Chrm3 double knockout chronically diminishes REM sleep to an almost undetectable level. These results suggest that muscarinic acetylcholine receptors, Chrm1 and Chrm3, are essential for REM sleep.

Oscillatory gene expression and somitogenesis.

A bilateral pair of somites forms periodically by segmentation of the anterior ends of the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). This periodic event is regulated by a biological clock called the segmentation clock, which involves cyclic gene expression. Expression of her1 and her7 in zebrafish and Hes7 in mice oscillates by negative feedback, and mathematical models have been used to generate and test hypotheses to aide elucidation of the role of negative feedback in regulating oscillatory expression. her/Hes genes induce oscillatory expression of the Notch ligand deltaC in zebrafish and the Notch modulator Lunatic fringe in mice, which lead to synchronization of oscillatory gene expression between neighboring PSM cells. In the mouse PSM, Hes7 induces coupled oscillations of Notch and Fgf signaling, while Notch and Fgf signaling cooperatively regulate Hes7 oscillation, indicating that Hes7 and Notch and Fgf signaling form the oscillator networks. Notch signaling activates, but Fgf signaling represses, expression of the master regulator for somitogenesis Mesp2, and coupled oscillations in Notch and Fgf signaling dissociate in the anterior PSM, which allows Notch signaling-induced synchronized cells to express Mesp2 after these cells are freed from Fgf signaling. These results together suggest that Notch signaling defines the prospective somite region, while Fgf signaling regulates the pace of segmentation. It is likely that these oscillator networks constitute the core of the segmentation clock, but it remains to be determined whether as yet unknown oscillators function behind the scenes.

Different types of oscillations in Notch and Fgf signaling regulate the spatiotemporal periodicity of somitogenesis.

Somitogenesis is controlled by cyclic genes such as Notch effectors and by the wave front established by morphogens such as Fgf8, but the precise mechanism of how these factors are coordinated remains to be determined. Here, we show that effectors of Notch and Fgf pathways oscillate in different dynamics and that oscillations in Notch signaling generate alternating phase shift, thereby periodically segregating a group of synchronized cells, whereas oscillations in Fgf signaling released these synchronized cells for somitogenesis at the same time. These results suggest that Notch oscillators define the prospective somite region, while Fgf oscillators regulate the pace of segmentation.

Ultradian oscillations in Notch signaling regulate dynamic biological events.

Notch signaling regulates many dynamic processes; accordingly, expression of genes in this pathway is also dynamic. In mouse embryos, one dynamic process regulated by Notch is somite segmentation, which occurs with a 2-h periodicity. This periodic event is regulated by a biological clock called the segmentation clock, which involves cyclic expression of the Notch effector gene Hes7. Loss of Hes7 expression and sustained expression of Hes7 result in identical and severe somite defects, suggesting that Hes7 oscillation is required for proper somite segmentation. Mathematical models of this oscillator have been used to generate and test hypothesis, helping to uncover the role of negative feedback in regulating the oscillator. Oscillations of another Notch effector gene, Hes1, plays an important role in maintenance of neural stem cells. Hes1 expression oscillates with a period of about 2-3h in neural stem cells, whereas sustained Hes1 expression inhibits proliferation and differentiation of these cells, suggesting that Hes1 oscillations are important for their proper activities. Hes1 inhibits its own expression as well as the expression of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 and the Notch ligand Delta1, driving oscillations of these two genes. Delta1 oscillations in turn maintain neural stem cells by mutual activation of Notch signaling, which re-activates Hes1 to close the cycle. Hes1 expression also oscillates in embryonic stem (ES) cells. Cells expressing low and high levels of Hes1 tend to differentiate into neural and mesodermal cells, respectively. Furthermore, Hes1-null ES cells display early and uniform neural differentiation, indicating that Hes1 oscillations act to promote multipotency by generating heterogeneity in both the differentiation timing and the fate choice. Taken together, these results suggest that Notch signaling can drive short-period oscillatory expression of Hes7 and Hes1 (ultradian oscillation) and that ultradian oscillations are important for many biological events.

Rhythmic gene expression in somite formation and neural development.

In mouse embryos, somite formation occurs every two hours, and this periodic event is regulated by a biological clock called the segmentation clock, which involves cyclic expression of the basic helix-loop-helix gene Hes7. Hes7 expression oscillates by negative feedback and is cooperatively regulated by Fgf and Notch signaling. Both loss of expression and sustained expression of Hes7 result in severe somite fusion, suggesting that Hes7 oscillation is required for proper somite segmentation. Expression of a related gene, Hes1, also oscillates by negative feedback with a period of about two hours in many cell types such as neural progenitor cells. Hes1 is required for maintenance of neural progenitor cells, but persistent Hes1 expression inhibits proliferation and differentiation of these cells, suggesting that Hes1 oscillation is required for their proper activities. Hes1 oscillation regulates cyclic expression of the proneural gene Neurogenin2 (Ngn2) and the Notch ligand Delta1, which in turn lead to maintenance of neural progenitor cells by mutual activation of Notch signaling. Taken together, these results suggest that oscillatory expression with short periods (ultradian oscillation) plays an important role in many biological events.

Mesp2 and Tbx6 cooperatively create periodic patterns coupled with the clock machinery during mouse somitogenesis.

The metameric structures in vertebrates are based on the periodicity of the somites that are formed one by one from the anterior end of the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). The timing and spacing of somitogenesis are regulated by the segmentation clock, which is characterized by the oscillation of several signaling pathways in mice. The temporal information needs to be translated into a spatial pattern in the so-called determination front, at which cells become responsive to the clock signal. The transcription factor Mesp2 plays a crucial role in this process, regulating segmental border formation and rostro-caudal patterning. However, the mechanisms regulating the spatially restricted and periodic expression of Mesp2 have remained elusive. Using high-resolution fluorescent in situ hybridization in conjunction with immunohistochemical analyses, we have found a clear link between Mesp2 transcription and the periodic waves of Notch activity. We also find that Mesp2 transcription is spatially defined by Tbx6: Mesp2 transcription and Tbx6 protein initially share an identical anterior border in the PSM, but once translated, Mesp2 protein leads to the suppression of Tbx6 protein expression post-translationally via rapid degradation mediated by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. This reciprocal regulation is the spatial mechanism that successively defines the position of the next anterior border of Mesp2. We further show that FGF signaling provides a spatial cue to position the expression domain of Mesp2. Taken together, we conclude that Mesp2 is the final output signal by which the temporal information from the segmentation clock is translated into segmental patterning during mouse somitogenesis.

The initiation and propagation of Hes7 oscillation are cooperatively regulated by Fgf and notch signaling in the somite segmentation clock.

Periodic formation of somites is controlled by the segmentation clock, where the oscillator Hes7 regulates cyclic expression of the Notch modulator Lunatic fringe. Here, we show that Hes7 also regulates cyclic expression of the Fgf signaling inhibitor Dusp4 and links Notch and Fgf oscillations in phase. Strikingly, inactivation of Notch signaling abolishes the propagation but allows the initiation of Hes7 oscillation. By contrast, transient inactivation of Fgf signaling abolishes the initiation, whereas sustained inactivation abolishes both the initiation and propagation of Hes7 oscillation. We thus propose that Hes7 oscillation is initiated by Fgf signaling and propagated/maintained anteriorly by Notch signaling.

Oscillator mechanism of Notch pathway in the segmentation clock.

Somites are formed by periodic segmentation of the presomitic mesoderm (PSM). This periodic event is controlled by the segmentation clock, where Notch signaling plays an essential role. The basic helix-loop-helix factor Hes7, a Notch effector, is cyclically expressed by negative feedback and regulates cyclic expression of Lunatic fringe (Lfng), a Notch modulator. Lfng then seems to periodically inhibit Notch, leading to oscillation in Notch activity. It is thought that these coupled negative feedback loops by Hes7 and Lfng are important for sustained and synchronized oscillations in the PSM. Of interest, another Notch effector, Hes1, is cyclically expressed by many cell types such as neuroblasts, suggesting that this clock is widely distributed and regulates many biological events. This review summarizes the recent finding about roles and mechanism of Notch signaling in the segmentation clock and discusses the significance of Hes1 oscillation in non-PSM cells.