Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Perinatol ; 44(6): 851-856, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38773215

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infants with past NICU admission have a significantly higher risk of developing neurodevelopmental disorders. Studies have demonstrated an iatrogenic effect of the NICU environment on neurodevelopmental outcomes, even while accounting for physical factors. It is, therefore, critical that an infant's LOS is driven by physical needs versus sociodemographic barriers. METHODS: We leveraged electronic health records and a backward selection regression model to explore physical and sociodemographic predictors of infant LOS. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that physical predictors (birthweight and ventilator use) accounted for the majority of variance in our model but that a sociodemographic predictor, mean visits per day, was also significant. CONCLUSIONS: Infants who were visited more frequently experienced a shorter LOS, possibly due to increased parental involvement resulting in more individualized care and directly impacting infant stability and morbidity. By supporting visitation, we can reduce the costs of lengthy NICU hospitalizations while improving infant and parent health and well-being.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Length of Stay , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Birth Weight , Respiration, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Respiration, Artificial/adverse effects , Infant, Premature , Electronic Health Records , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors
2.
Med Decis Making ; 42(8): 985-998, 2022 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35762832

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Even after a physician recommendation, many people remain unscreened for colorectal cancer (CRC). The proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs) and tethered online portals may afford new opportunities to embed patient-facing interventions within clinic workflows and engage patients following a physician recommendation for care. We evaluated the effectiveness of a patient-facing intervention designed to complement physician office-based recommendations for CRC screening. DESIGN: Using a 2-arm pragmatic, randomized clinical trial, we evaluated the intervention's effect on CRC screening use as documented in the EHR (primary outcome) and the extent to which the intervention reached the target population. Trial participants were insured, aged 50 to 75 y, with a physician recommendation for CRC screening. Typical EHR functionalities, including patient registries, health maintenance flags, best practice alerts, and secure messaging, were used to support research-related activities and deliver the intervention to enrolled patients. RESULTS: A total of 1,825 adults consented to trial participation, of whom 78% completed a baseline survey and were exposed to the intervention. Most trial participants (>80%) indicated an intent to be screened on the baseline survey, and 65% were screened at follow-up, with no significant differences by study arm. One-third of eligible patients were sent a secure message. Among those, more than three-quarters accessed study material. CONCLUSIONS: By leveraging common EHR functionalities, we integrated a patient-facing intervention within clinic workflows. Despite practice integration, the intervention did not improve screening use, likely in part due to portal-based interventions not reaching those for whom the intervention may be most effective. IMPLICATIONS: Embedding patient-facing interventions within the EHR enabled practice integration but may minimize program effectiveness by missing important segments of the patient population. HIGHLIGHTS: Electronic health record tools can be used to facilitate practice-embedded pragmatic trial and patient-facing intervention processes, including patient identification, study arm allocation, and intervention delivery.The online portal-embedded intervention did not improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening uptake following a physician recommendation, likely in part because portal users tend to be already highly engaged with healthcare.Relying on patient portals alone for CRC screening interventions may not alter screening use and could exacerbate well-known care disparities.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Electronic Health Records , Adult , Humans , Early Detection of Cancer , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mass Screening
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...