A scoping review exploring how adults self-describe and communicate about the listening difficulties they experience.

Objective: It is unknown how adults communicate about their experienced listening difficulties with their audiologist. This scoping review aims to explore how adults self-describe the listening difficulties that they experience, and how they communicate about them. Design: A scoping review was conducted between December 2020 and September 2022 to identify published journal articles in which adults described and communicated about their listening difficulties. Study sample: Database searches yielded 10,224 articles initially. After abstract screening and full text review, 55 articles were included for analysis. Results: The listening difficulties that adults described were varied, highlighting the fact that each person has individual experiences. Adults discussed reasons for their listening difficulties, impacts of their listening difficulties, and behavioural responses they adopted to cope with their listening difficulties. Conclusions: This review shows the broad impacts of listening difficulties, and the varied ways in which adults discuss their listening difficulties. There is no available literature reporting how adults communicate about their listening difficulties in a clinical context.

Parents' Perceptions of a Serious Game for Educating Families on Prescription Opioid Safety: Qualitative Pilot Study of MedSMARxT: Adventures in PharmaCity.

BACKGROUND: Opioid misuse is a pervasive, worsening problem that affects the health of people throughout the United States, including adolescents. There are few adolescent-focused interventions designed to educate them about opioid medication safety. The MedSMARxT: Adventures in PharmaCity, is a serious educational video game that teaches parents and their youths about safe opioid practices. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate parent's perceptions of MedSMARxT: Adventures in PharmaCity and its potential use by parents and their adolescents. METHODS: Parents of adolescents aged 12 to 18 years who live in the United States were recruited from April to October 2021 via Qualtrics research panels, social media, email listserves, and snowball sampling. The study participants played MedSMARxT: Adventures in PharmaCity for 30 minutes and then participated in a 30-minute postgame interview via WebEx (Cisco). Questions were developed and piloted to examine adults' perceptions of the game. Participants were asked three sets of open-ended questions: (1) questions about the game and elements of the game, (2) what they learned from the game, and (3) questions about their experience with games. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim. Interview transcripts were coded using content and thematic analysis by study team members to identify major themes and subthemes from the data. RESULTS: Parent participants (N=67) played MedSMARxT: Adventures in PharmaCity and completed a postgame interview. Analysis extrapolated four primary themes from the data: (1) participant gaming experience, (2) perception of game features, (3) educational purpose of the game, and (4) future use of the game. Most participants (n=56, 84%), had at least some experience with video games. More than half of the participants (n=35, 52%) participants, had positive reactions to the game characters and scenes depicted in MedSMARxT: Adventures in PharmaCity and stated they were realistic for adolescents. Most participants (n=39, 58%), would recommend the game to others. Significant difficulties with gameplay navigation were reported by 38 (57%) participants, as well as a slow game pace. All participants were able to accurately identify the overarching goal of the game: opioid or medication safety. The game reinforced existing knowledge for participants, though many (n=15, 22%), reported a new awareness of the need to store opioid medications in a locked area and the availability of medication disposal drop boxes at pharmacies. Participants stated that they would recommend the game for future use by families and youths in various health care and non-health care settings. CONCLUSIONS: The use of a tailored serious game is a novel, engaging tool to educate adolescents on opioid safety. MedSMARxT: Adventures in PharmaCity can be used as a tool for parents and adolescents to facilitate meaningful dialogue about safe and appropriate opioid use.

Improving inpatient discharge workflows through pharmacist pending discharge medication orders.

PURPOSE: Hospital discharge represents a difficult care transition for patients, with the potential for medication-related problems (MRPs) and adverse events. Medication reconciliation is widely accepted as a best practice to minimize MRPs at the time of discharge. Pharmacists can play a key role in identification and resolution of MRPs, although pharmacist reconciliation usually occurs after provider medication reconciliation. This workflow is often inefficient and results in duplication of work within the care team. A prospective pharmacist-led pilot program with preparation of discharge medication orders for provider review, also known as pended medication orders, was investigated to determine its impact on MRPs and discharge processing time. SUMMARY: Patient discharges from February through April 2022 were compared for 2 hospital medicine services at a large academic medical center. One group participated in the pilot workflow, while the other used standard discharge workflows. The pilot group had a significant decrease in the average number of clinical interventions made by a pharmacist after provider orders were placed (52.4% decrease; P = 0.03) and a nonsignificant reduction in the time from provider order entry to completion of the final pharmacist medication reconciliation (47.6% reduction; P = 0.18) compared to the group using standard workflows. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist-led, prospective discharge medication reconciliation with pending of medication orders for provider review increases overall discharge efficiency. Data from this project and previous studies support an expanded pharmacist role in the discharge process and continued high-level collaboration between pharmacists and providers.

Characterizing medication management and the role of pharmacists in caring for people living with cystic fibrosis: A work system approach.

BACKGROUND: Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive genetic disease requiring complex, lifelong medication regimens. Given the importance of medication in CF treatment, pharmacists are vital CF care team members in the care of people living with CF (PwCF). OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to (1) define patients' CF medication experiences and educational needs and (2) investigate the CF outpatient clinic and community pharmacist's role in addressing patient challenges. METHODS: A work system approach informed by the Systems Engineering Initiative for Patient Safety (SEIPS) model was used to characterize knowledge and perception of CF medication regimens, educational modalities, and pharmacist interactions for PwCF. Semistructured interviews were conducted with adults living with CF at a CF center clinic. Data analyses identified relationships between the themes in the data and 4 SEIPS work system domains: tasks, tools and technology, person, and environment. RESULTS: Thirty PwCF interviews highlighted 4 themes regarding health care experiences: (1) medication use experience, (2) medication education needs, (3) disease experience, and (4) pharmacist and pharmacy interactions. Patients reported complex medication regimens leading to challenges with medication adherence, although the benefit of treatment was recognized. Although a high level of disease-state knowledge was identified among the participants, PwCF desired to learn about CF medication benefits and adverse effects through credible sources using multiple modalities. Many reported a benefit of pharmacist involvement in their care. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists are well-positioned to support PwCF in adherence, medication regimen management, and medication education. Opportunities exist for growth in these supportive roles of a pharmacist in both community and outpatient clinic settings.

Hearing Aid Uptake, Benefit, and Use: The Impact of Hearing, Cognition, and Personal Factors.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of hearing, cognition, and personal factors on hearing aid (HA) uptake, use, and benefit. Method Eighty-five older adults aged 60-80 years (M = 70.23, SD = 5.17) participated in the study. Hearing was assessed using pure-tone audiometry and the Listening in Spatialised Noise-Sentences test. Cognition was measured using the Cogstate Brief Battery and the Cogstate Groton Maze Learning task. Personal demographics were recorded from participants' answers on a series of take-home questionnaires. HA benefit and use was subjectively reported at 3 and 6 months post HA fitting for those who chose to use HAs. Results Stepwise-regression and mixed-effects models indicated that stronger psychomotor function predicted greater reported use of HAs at 3 and 6 months post HA fitting. Greater family interaction scores also predicted greater HA use at 3 months after fitting. Participants who chose to be fitted with HAs had significantly poorer self-reported health and poorer audiometric thresholds. Poorer hearing was also significantly related with greater reported HA benefit. Conclusions A combination of cognitive, psychosocial factors and hearing impacted HA outcomes for the older Australians in this study. Self-reported HA use was significantly greater in participants with better psychomotor function. Furthermore, those with poorer self-reported health were more likely to choose to use HAs. These factors should be considered in audiological rehabilitation to best maximize patient HA outcomes.

The relationship between peripheral hearing loss and higher order listening function on cognition in older Australians.

Objective: Peripheral hearing, central auditory processing (CAP) and cognition are all important for comprehension of speech and deteriorate with increased age. This study aimed to examine the relation between hearing impairment and cognitive impairment by assessing both peripheral hearing impairment and CAP ability.Design: Cognition was measured using the CogState Brief Battery (CSBB). Peripheral hearing was measured across eight frequencies (250 Hz-8000 Hz) using pure tone audiometry, and CAP was measured using the Listening in Spatialised Noise-Sentences test (LiSN-S) and the Dichotic Digits Test. Data were analysed using correlation and regression analyses.Study sample: Around 85 adults aged 60.33-83.08 years who attended the Melbourne Audiology clinic and had no previous diagnosis of dementia were included in the study.Results: A significant association was found between degree of peripheral hearing impairment and the cognitive skills of attention and executive function as measured by the CSBB. Additionally, CAP abilities as assessed using the LiSN-S test were significantly correlated with at least one cognitive measure.Conclusions: This study adds to the knowledge that peripheral hearing and CAP ability both share an association with cognition, specifically identifying cognitive skills and measures of "hearing" that mediate this relationship.

Peripheral and central hearing impairment and their relationship with cognition: a review.

Objective: To consider the relationships between both peripheral and central hearing impairment and cognition. Design: Narrative review. Study sample: Numerous studies exploring the relationship between hearing impairment and cognitive function, particularly in an older population. Results: In addition to the well-documented relationship between peripheral hearing loss and cognition highlighted in previous comprehensive reviews, there is also some evidence to suggest that there is a relationship between central hearing impairment and cognition. Further research is required to better understand this relationship and its effects on hearing aid benefit in people with both peripheral hearing loss and central hearing impairment. Conclusions: To fully understand the relationship between hearing impairment and cognitive impairment, not only peripheral but central hearing needs to be considered. Such knowledge could be of benefit in the clinical management of people with both peripheral hearing loss and central hearing impairment.