ABSTRACT
Background: Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria (CSU) is an immune-mediated skin disease that may require prolonged treatments. Currently, there are no recommendations for treatment discontinuation once CSU symptoms are controlled, particularly among patients primarily diagnosed with severe CSU. Objective: In this real-life study we aimed to describe our experience of omalizumab (Oma) treatment withdrawal in CSU and define biomarkers related to these outcomes. Methods: CSU patients followed at our allergy clinic from January 2016 to December 2022 were included. Response to Oma therapy, and Oma-withdrawal outcomes among patients who reached complete remission for >6 months were analyzed. Results: During the study period 192/335(%) CSU patients were categorized as severe-CSU and entitled to receive Oma according to our country's regulations. Of them, 131/192(68%) were considered "Oma-responders", and 95/131(72.5%) patients underwent gradual treatment withdrawal. Successful Oma-withdrawal was documented in 47/95(49.5%) whereas 48/95(50.5%) patients experienced flare and were defined as unsuccessful OMA-withdrawal. The first was associated with shorter disease duration 7.1 ± 7.4 years vs. 10.7 ± 9.4 (P = 0.042), lower baseline-IgE 81.6 ± 84.1IU/ml vs. 324.7 ± 555.9 (P = 0.005), and lower baseline-eosinophils count 131.4 ± 110.5 vs. 195.6 ± 98.4 (P = 0.043) in comparison to failure of Oma-withdrawal group. Conclusion: OMA may be successfully withdrawn in up to 50% of severe CSU patients following complete remission of disease symptoms, utilizing a gradual withdrawal protocol. Oma-withdrawal failure was linked with longer duration of disease as well as high IgE and eosinophil counts prior to initiation of Oma therapy. These parameters may enable the design of a treatment withdrawal algorithm.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) may cause chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Current knowledge regarding prevalence and risk factors for CTEPH among APS patients is limited. We sought to determine clinical features and biomarkers that could identify APS subjects suffering from CTEPH, and describe the prevalence, course and treatment outcomes of patients with APS-CTEPH. METHODS: 504 APS patients were treated in our center during 2008 to 2019. We studied clinical and laboratory features of 69 APS patients, comparing 19 patients diagnosed with CTEPH (APS-CTEPH) and treated accordingly, with 50 consecutive age and gender matched patients with no evidence of pulmonary hypertension (APS-No-CTEPH). RESULTS: CTEPH prevalence was 3.8% in our APS cohort and was linked with the following parameters: primary APS (p < 0.05); prior pulmonary embolism (p < 0.001); recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) (p < 0.001); lower platelet counts (p < 0.001); triple anti-phospholipid antibodies positivity (p < 0.001), higher titers of anti-cardiolipin IgG (p < 0.001), anti-B2GPI IgG (p < 0.001), and high Russell viper venom time ratio (RVVT-ratio) (p < 0.05). Additionally, history of catastrophic APS was more prevalent in APS-CTEPH vs APS-No-CTEPH (p < 0.05). Of APS-CTEPH patients, 15/19 underwent pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA): In 12/15 the procedure was elective and resulted in good perioperative and long-term outcomes, while only 1 of 3 patients that underwent urgent PEA survived. CONCLUSIONS: CTEPH is relatively common in APS. Primary APS, prior PE, recurrent VTE, thrombocytopenia and specific anti-phospholipid antibodies predict CTEPH in APS. Active assessment for CTEPH in APS patients should be considered, as PEA was found to be effective and relatively safe, especially if electively performed.
